Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Council Attachments Page 91 ITEM 12 (continued) ATTACHMENT 7 Amend LEP 2011 Heritage Map to be in line with DoPI requirements that Archaeological Heritage Items be identified separately to General Heritage Items. Reason - Council has one archaeological heritage item in Gladesville which is identified in Schedule 5 Environmental heritage as an archaeological item but which has been mapped as a general item. Amend Clause 4.5A(b) Density Controls for Zone R2 Low Density Residential by deleting reference to access to private open space. Reason – The clause requires that separate access to private open space from an unbuilt upon portion of the site. This requirement is more appropriately covered in a DCP in that specific ways of achieving such access such as through a garage can be specified. Amend LEP 2011 Lot Size Map to delete all areas from the map which are not zoned residential on the Land Zoning Map. Reason- The Lot Size Map specifies the minimum lot size for residential subdivision. A number of properties have been rezoned in the Land Zoning Map from a residential to a business zoning. This change was not carried through to the Lot Size Map and as such the Lot Size Map should be amended Update LEP 2011 Ryde Civic Precinct Map to include additional areas as identified in Draft DCP 2011 - Part 4.4 Ryde Town Centre Reason - The new precinct areas were identified after the submission of the DLEP into DoPI. Amend LEP 2011 Floor Space Ratio Map with respect to 1 Monash Road Gladesville to bring it in line with LEP Ryde LEP (Gladesville Town Centre and Victoria Road Corridor) 2010 Floor Space Ratio Map Reason - Under 2010 the subject property, which is a heritage item has no FSR. An error occurred in the transfer of FSR controls for the site and under DLEP 2011 resulting in the property being given an FSR. Amend Clause 4.3 (2C) so that the maximum height for dwellings in both multi dwelling housing and dual occupancy (attached) developments that do not have frontage to a street is 5m. The clause at present only relates to multi dwelling housing developments. To ensure consistent controls exist governing the height of all rear dwellings the clause should include dual occupancy developments. Schedule 2 – Exempt development - Amend conditions for Signage (real estate sign for a residential site) Reason - An error occurred in the Schedule in that the conditions for Signage (retail premises windows) were inadvertently repeated for Signage (real estate sign for residential sites). It is proposed to reinstate the existing conditions under LEP 2010 for Signage (real estate sign for residential sites). Other matters related to draft LEP 2011 There are a number of other matters that the Council should consider in relation to DLEP and land within the City. 1. Macquarie University In September 2009 Macquarie University was identified under SEPP (Major Development) 2005 in Schedule 3 State Significant Sites. Under the SEPP the site (Figure 1) is zoned SP2 Educational establishment and B4 Mixed Use. The SEPP also specifies a Gross Floor Area Map and a Height of Buildings Attachment 7 - Council report 24 July 2012 - Draft Ryde LEP 2011 - Submissions
Council Attachments Page 92 ITEM 12 (continued) ATTACHMENT 7 Map for the site. The zoning, FSR and height maps are significantly different to both LEP 2010 and the draft LEP. (Figure 1) The DoPI have advised the following with respect to the differences between the zoning of land and controls in DLEP 2011 and the SEPP for the site. - The Department does not expect Council to update the maps to incorporate the Major Development SEPP controls for Macquarie University into the DLEP at this stage. However, the Department may seek Council's assistance at a later date. - No action is necessary in relation to LEP 2010. - The Department will liaise with Council should the controls for Macquarie University need to be transferred from the Major Development SEPP into the DLEP 2011. Council's assistance with map changes may be required. Recommended Action It is considered that unless directed by DoPI there is no requirement to amend the Draft LEP to bring it in line with its zoning, FSR or height under the SEPP. 2. 461 Victoria Road Gladesville Under Schedule 1 Additional permitted uses a bulky goods premises is permitted at 461 Victoria Rd Gladesville. This was based on a recommendation of the Ryde Local Planning Study that was adopted by Council on 7 December 2010. The Local Planning Study comprised a number of individual studies including the Centres and Corridors Study. A report on the community consultation and submissions received to that study was submitted to Council on the 2 November 2010 where it was identified that a submission had been received from the landowner of 461 Victoria Road Gladesville seeking bulky goods premises as an additional land use on the site. The request was supported as the lands are identified as strategic employment lands in the Inner North Sub regional Strategy. Council has recently received a planning proposal for the site which is seeking a rezoning for additional land uses, including ‘bulky goods premises, garden centre and hardware and building supplies’ under Ryde Local Environmental Plan 2010. The proposal also includes an amendment to the Ryde Height of Buildings Map to include maximum RL’s over the subject site. It is anticipated that a report on the Planning Proposal will go to Council in October 2012. Attachment 7 - Council report 24 July 2012 - Draft Ryde LEP 2011 - Submissions
Page 1 and 2:
ATTACHMENTS FOR: AGENDA NO. 23/12 C
Page 3 and 4:
Attachment 1 - Table 1 Amendments t
Page 5 and 6:
Attachment 1 - Table 1 Amendments t
Page 7 and 8:
Council Attachments Page 6 ITEM 12
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
3. 3 - 9 Angus St Meadowbank - requ
Page 17 and 18:
Attachment 4 - Table 4 Details of r
Page 19 and 20:
4. Requests that residential accomm
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
NSW Land and Housing Corporation In
Page 29 and 30:
Attachment 5 - Table 5 Submissions
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42: Council Attachments Page 40 ITEM 12
Page 43 and 44: Linear separation rules are not fai
Page 91: Council Attachments Page 90 ITEM 12
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247:
Attachment 7 - Council report 24 Ju
show all

Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?