Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde

Attachment 5 - Table 5 Submissions in Support/Against/Other comments
Council Attachments Page 34
ITEM 12 (continued) ATTACHMENT 5
Area/Group No.
Subs
Issue Response Reason
inequitable as it allows numerous
areas of Ryde will capable of being developed
developments in one street (eg
than others. However it may require the
Miriam Rd) but would be impossible
consolidation of lots to achieve a development
for development to occur in another.
that complies.
Existing Controls/
Open Space/
Environment/Other
5
1. Lot size and 20m road frontage is
prohibitive as there are only a few
lots in Ryde that would comply. -
Lot size and frontage will greatly
limit number of dual
occupancy/multi unit dwelling
developments in Ryde
2. Prefer Torrens title subdivision of
dual occupancy developments
The removal of linear separation for such
development from the DCP means that areas
such as Miriam Rd (which have large lot
subdivision patterns) could result in numerous
Das being submitted for such developments
1. As part of the Local Planning Study Council on
the 7 December 2010 adopted a
recommendation to introduce a control to
require a minimum street frontage of 20m for
duplex developments.
The aim of the 20m frontage is to deliver better
design outcomes, particularly with regard to
compatibility with existing streetscapes.
A 20m frontage requirement does mean that
based on existing subdivision patterns certain
areas of Ryde will capable of being developed
than others.
2. The definition of a dual occupancy
development is 2 dwellings on 1 lot of land. If
the land were Torrens title subdivided it would
result in 1 dwelling on 1 lot of land and
therefore by definition no longer be a dual
occupancy development. Also a Torrens title
would result in land parcels having a land area
of approximately 290sqm. – such a change