Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde
Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde
Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Council <strong>Attachment</strong>s Page 44<br />
ITEM 12 (continued) ATTACHMENT 6<br />
Speaker Name Property /Area<br />
addressed<br />
3. Gladesville<br />
Industrial Area<br />
<strong>Attachment</strong> 6 - Table 6 Speakers to Council meeting 24 July 2012<br />
Request/Issues Response/Comments provided<br />
Problems <strong>of</strong><br />
leasing<br />
properties<br />
Bulky goods in<br />
business zones<br />
inappropriate<br />
Council has<br />
permitted bulky goods<br />
premises at 461 Victoria<br />
Rd<br />
B5 is the appropriate<br />
zone<br />
Planning Proposal for the site should be submitted to<br />
Council.<br />
Recommendation – No change to DLEP 2011 and that a<br />
planning proposal be lodged with Council for consideration,<br />
rezoning the property B4.<br />
Bulky goods premises is defined as a building used for the<br />
sale , hire or display <strong>of</strong> bulky goods being <strong>of</strong> such size or<br />
weight to require a large handling display area and includes<br />
goods such as floor and window supplies , furniture ,<br />
household electrical goods and swimming pools.<br />
The retail nature <strong>of</strong> bulky goods and its likely impact on<br />
reducing the land available for industrial uses is such that<br />
they should be considered on an individual basis through a<br />
Planning Proposal.<br />
DoPI on 20 June 2012 advised Council <strong>of</strong> the following;<br />
“Our preference is to exclude bulky goods retail from<br />
industrial zones as an additional use across the zone<br />
because the inclusion <strong>of</strong> 'bulky goods' is now considered<br />
fundamentally to be a retail use that is likely to reduce the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> industrial land<br />
The preference now is to either:<br />
1. cluster permissibility <strong>of</strong> these uses in a suitable area<br />
(close to commercial is ideal but may not be achievable)<br />
and to give them a B5 zoning or<br />
2. allow the use by a Schedule 1 amendment for the<br />
particular site based on suitability criteria (less preferable<br />
but less damaging to the whole zone)<br />
In either case the PP should assess the proposal against