02.05.2013 Views

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 223-<br />

AN UNUSUAL RESPONSE: A NEUTRAL CONVOY<br />

Within <strong>the</strong> highly-strained atmosphere <strong>of</strong> March 1918, Queen Wilhelmina saw an<br />

opportunity to reclaim some dignity for her country <strong>and</strong> asseli its capacity for independent<br />

action. In April 1918, <strong>the</strong> Minister in Charge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Navy, J. J. Rambonnet, announced to<br />

parliament that <strong>the</strong> Queen endorsed a plan to send a convoy <strong>of</strong> ships to <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s'<br />

East Indies. 148 The convoy would consist <strong>of</strong> merchant vessels canying government goods<br />

<strong>and</strong> passengers, <strong>and</strong> would be accompanied by warships. 149 No commercial cargo would be<br />

allowed on board, to ensure that none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> belligerents had reason to inspect <strong>the</strong><br />

vessels. ISO The proposal posed several difficulties. Not only did <strong>the</strong> convoy have to traverse<br />

dangerous stretches <strong>of</strong> international <strong>sea</strong>s, it also had to pass through <strong>the</strong> Allied blockade.<br />

The Dutch had to get an agreement from all belligerents as well as all countries whose<br />

waters <strong>the</strong> convoy wished to use. IS! A major issue arose over whe<strong>the</strong>r sending a military<br />

convoy compromised neutrality. While <strong>the</strong> warships would protect merchant vessels from<br />

attack, if a foreign vessel fired at <strong>the</strong> convoy, it was effectively declaring war on <strong>the</strong><br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s. If <strong>the</strong> Navy undeliook any questionable actions on <strong>the</strong> journey to <strong>the</strong> Indies, it<br />

could bring <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s into <strong>the</strong> war. FUlihermore, Britain was adamant that neutrals<br />

could not send convoys since, by definition, convoy applied only to belligerents. ls2<br />

The ambiguities involved in <strong>the</strong> convoy issue made many Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>ers wary <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> idea, especially as it strained already tense Anglo-Dutch relations. While Gennany <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> United States agreed to let <strong>the</strong> convoy sail, Britain was entirely reluctant to allow <strong>the</strong><br />

convoy through its blockade. For <strong>the</strong>ir pati, <strong>the</strong> Dutch were unwilling to give Britain access<br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir warships <strong>and</strong> did not want to be unduly detained in a foreign port. During <strong>the</strong><br />

negotiations, <strong>the</strong> Dutch govermnent trod dangerous ground. Britain saw <strong>the</strong> convoy as a<br />

"deliberate attempt to break <strong>the</strong> blockade", which, if allowed, would set a dangerous<br />

precedent for o<strong>the</strong>r continental nations. IS3 It believed it could not give up a right <strong>of</strong> "<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

<strong>and</strong> visit", which it had upheld for centuries, <strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> sailing date was repeatedly<br />

148 For more details on <strong>the</strong> Dutch convoy see: Watson, "Britain's Dutch Policy" pp. 196 - 207.<br />

149 Colenbr<strong>and</strong>er, Studien en Aantekeningen over Nederl<strong>and</strong>sche PolWek pp. 302 - 305; Watson, "Britain's Dutch<br />

Policy" p. 196; Porter, "Dutch Neutrality" p. 157.<br />

150 "Notulen van de Ministerraad" [Notes from <strong>the</strong> cabinet meeting] 5 <strong>and</strong> 12 April 1918, in Smit (ed.), Besclleiden<br />

betrefJende de buitenl<strong>and</strong>sche politiek van Nederl<strong>and</strong> 1848 - 1919. Derde Periode 1899 - 1919. Vijfde deel, 1917-<br />

1919. Eerste stukpp. 438 -439, 444; Watson, "Britain's Dutch Policy" p. 199.<br />

151 V<strong>and</strong>enbosch, The Neutrality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s pp. 259 - 260.<br />

152 Ibid. p. 36.<br />

153 Watson, "Britain's Dutch Policy" p. 198.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!