02.05.2013 Views

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- Chapter 1<br />

A Nation Too Small to<br />

Commit Great Stupidities: 1<br />

The Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Neutrality,<br />

1813 1918<br />

It was as if it was self-evident that nobody would busy<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves with <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

H. T. Colellbralldel' (1920)2<br />

The essence <strong>of</strong> neutrality is <strong>the</strong> avoidance <strong>of</strong> war: namely, <strong>the</strong> avoidance <strong>of</strong> being<br />

involved in <strong>the</strong> wars <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. But despite its deceptively simple definition, neutrality is not<br />

a homogeneous concept. It has changed meanings over <strong>the</strong> centuries, reflecting <strong>the</strong> concerns<br />

<strong>of</strong> states adopting it as <strong>the</strong>ir foreign policy <strong>and</strong> those desiring to challenge its validity.<br />

Neutrality has a long history going back as far as <strong>the</strong> sixth century B.C.E. when Milesians<br />

abstained from supporting ei<strong>the</strong>r Ionian Greece or Persia. 3 During <strong>the</strong> Middle Ages, it was<br />

COlmnon practice for warring parties to refrain from sinking ships <strong>of</strong> countries not involved<br />

in <strong>the</strong> conflict. 4 In <strong>the</strong> fifteenth century, neutrality became a vaguely defined quasi-legal<br />

tenn referring to nations that opted out <strong>of</strong> a particular war. Neutrals at that time could<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ess partiality to one or o<strong>the</strong>r side <strong>and</strong> could supply it with all manner <strong>of</strong> materials,<br />

including military goods. 5 Nei<strong>the</strong>r contrab<strong>and</strong> regulation nor impartiality were widely<br />

followed, although neutral ships were protected from privateering. 6 Napoleon's disregard<br />

I H. A. Lorentz, Dutch physicist <strong>and</strong> Nobel Prize winner, late nineteenth century, in V<strong>and</strong>enbosch, Dutch Foreign<br />

Policy p. xii (also in V<strong>and</strong>enbosch, "The small states in intemational politics" p. 303).<br />

2 "Het was als<strong>of</strong>het vanzelf sprak, dat niem<strong>and</strong> Nederl<strong>and</strong> moeien zou" (in H. T. Colenbr<strong>and</strong>er, "De intemationale<br />

positie van Nederl<strong>and</strong> tijdens, v66r en na den wereldoorlog" [The intemational position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s during,<br />

before <strong>and</strong> after <strong>the</strong> world war] in Brugmans (ed.), Nederl<strong>and</strong> in den oorlogstijd p. 103).<br />

3 Raymond, "Neutrality Norms" p. 123.<br />

4 Comelis Boudewijn Wels, Alo<strong>of</strong>iless & Neutrality. Studies on Dutch Foreign Relations <strong>and</strong> Policy-Making<br />

Institutions. Utrecht: Hes Publishers, 1982, p. 19.<br />

5 Orvik, The Decline <strong>of</strong> Neutrality pp. 11 - 12.<br />

6 Alfred P. Rubin, "The concept <strong>of</strong> neutrality in intemationallaw" in Leonhard et. al. (eds.), Neutrality. Changing<br />

Concepts pp. 16 - 17.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!