02.05.2013 Views

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 45-<br />

territorial advantage to an ally. Even combined, Belgium <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s were not large<br />

enough to exeli significant influence in international affairs; <strong>the</strong>y were, in <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> one<br />

commentator, "too large for a napkin but too small for a tablecloth".32 This would remain a<br />

major stumbling block to closer Dutch-Belgian relations after Belgium seceded from <strong>the</strong><br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s in 1830. Once Belgium attained <strong>of</strong>ficial independent status in 1839, its geo­<br />

strategic importance (bordering both France <strong>and</strong> Germany <strong>and</strong> providing a territorial barrier<br />

between Britain <strong>and</strong> France) was heightened. For almost entirely this reason alone,<br />

Europe's major powers (Britain, France, Prussia, Austria-Hungary <strong>and</strong> Russia) imposed a<br />

state <strong>of</strong> pennanent neutrality on Belgium, guaranteeing that <strong>the</strong>y would come to its rescue if<br />

it were attacked. 33 The Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, did not have its neutrality<br />

guaranteed, principally because it was not as pivotal to separating <strong>the</strong> west European<br />

nations. Yet <strong>the</strong> conditions that forced neutrality on Belgium made it equally attractive as a<br />

voluntary foreign policy for <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>of</strong> Gennany/Prussia as a major power in Europe <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong><br />

Bismarck's complicated system <strong>of</strong> alliances (1862 - 1890), <strong>the</strong> leanings <strong>of</strong> particular states<br />

(however small) became increasingly important. Countries like <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s had <strong>the</strong><br />

potential to upset <strong>the</strong> Bismarckian balance drastically <strong>and</strong>, as a result, small European states<br />

gained significance far beyond <strong>the</strong>ir size. 34 By staying neutral, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s helped<br />

maintain <strong>the</strong> status quo. To a certain degree, <strong>the</strong> Dutch were aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir potential to<br />

disturb <strong>the</strong> peace <strong>and</strong> believed that <strong>the</strong>ir neighbours would respect <strong>the</strong>ir neutrality for <strong>the</strong><br />

same reason. It helped reinforce <strong>the</strong> idea that neutrality was not only sacred to <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

but to o<strong>the</strong>r Europeans as wel1. 35 This belief was borne out by <strong>the</strong> Franco-Prussian war,<br />

when <strong>the</strong> French <strong>and</strong> Germans respected both <strong>the</strong> neutrality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s as well as<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Belgium.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> dozen or so years leading up to <strong>the</strong> outbreak <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great War, two<br />

increasingly antagonistic camps replaced Bismarck's careful balance-<strong>of</strong>-power system.<br />

Germany <strong>and</strong> its ally Austria-Hungary found <strong>the</strong>mselves surrounded by a loose alliance <strong>of</strong><br />

32 V<strong>and</strong>enbosch, Dutch Foreign Policy p. 245.<br />

33 Rune Johansson, Small State in Boundary Conflict. Belgium <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Belgian-German Border 1914 - 1919. Lund:<br />

Lund <strong>University</strong> Press, 1988, p. 40.<br />

34 Paul W. Schroeder, "The Lost Intermediaries: The Impact <strong>of</strong> 1870 on <strong>the</strong> European System" The Intel'l1ational<br />

History Review. 6, no. 1, February 1984, p. 3.<br />

35 V<strong>and</strong>enbosch, Dutch Foreign Policy pp. 4, 59; Smit, Nederl<strong>and</strong> in de Eerste WereldoorlQg. Eerste deel p. 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!