02.05.2013 Views

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

Between the devil and the deep blue sea - University of Canterbury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 31 -<br />

Chapter 4 introduces <strong>the</strong> international obligations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> neutral state in time <strong>of</strong><br />

war. It also mentions <strong>the</strong> role played by <strong>the</strong> armed forces in preserving <strong>the</strong> regulations <strong>and</strong><br />

evaluates <strong>the</strong>ir most clearly identifiable task, namely <strong>the</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> territorial<br />

sovereignty. Before turning to external breaches <strong>of</strong> territorial integrity <strong>and</strong> illustrating how<br />

strict adherence to international law <strong>of</strong>ten had to give way to compromise, <strong>the</strong> chapter looks<br />

at what part deterrence played in <strong>the</strong> maintenance <strong>of</strong> neutrality <strong>and</strong> in dissuading o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

nations from invading. The chapter also addresses <strong>the</strong> fundamental contradiction involved<br />

in assigning <strong>the</strong> military both <strong>the</strong> duty to defend <strong>the</strong> country <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> duty to protect its<br />

neutrality, at times mutually exclusive goals given that what was important for defence did<br />

not necessarily correspond to what was best for <strong>the</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> non-belligerency. The<br />

contradiction between defence <strong>and</strong> neutrality became more pronounced during <strong>the</strong> war as<br />

<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> military deterrence decreased <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> likelihood <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s becoming a<br />

belligerent increased.<br />

The requirement to intern foreign soldiers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir military equipment if <strong>the</strong>y<br />

strayed onto neutral soil, proved to be one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most time-consuming <strong>and</strong> resource­<br />

draining aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> military's responsibility to safeguard territorial integrity. Chapter 5<br />

illustrates how easily <strong>the</strong> war situation could overtake <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nation <strong>and</strong> nation's<br />

anned forces to cope, namely by recounting <strong>the</strong> arrival <strong>of</strong> 30,000 Belgian <strong>and</strong> British<br />

internees on Dutch soil in October 1914, along with nearly a million civilian refugees from<br />

in <strong>and</strong> around <strong>the</strong> Belgian city <strong>of</strong> Antwerp. While <strong>the</strong> civilian refugees did not present a<br />

neutrality responsibility as such, it placed severe strains on civilian <strong>and</strong> military resources.<br />

The internment <strong>of</strong> foreign military personnel proved to be one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> least controversial <strong>of</strong><br />

neutrality responsibilities, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch government was able to capitalise on its role as<br />

upholder <strong>of</strong> international law by initiating POW exchanges through <strong>the</strong> country, <strong>and</strong> acting<br />

as a safe-haven for escaped POW s <strong>and</strong> deserters. Yet dealing with <strong>the</strong> foreigners removed<br />

many Dutch troops from <strong>the</strong> borders <strong>and</strong> from o<strong>the</strong>r essential neutrality tasks, illustrating<br />

how easily <strong>the</strong> anned forces overstretched <strong>the</strong>ir ability during <strong>the</strong> war years.<br />

Economic neutrality was not a recognised responsibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch anned forces,<br />

except with regard to military contrab<strong>and</strong>, as Chapter 6 describes. Given <strong>the</strong> emphasis<br />

placed on economic warfare by <strong>the</strong> belligerents, however, <strong>the</strong> pressure on <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

to abide by rules <strong>and</strong> regulations that extended beyond contrab<strong>and</strong> issues ensured that<br />

military involvement in trade matters, especially in <strong>the</strong> policing <strong>of</strong> smuggling activities,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!