02.07.2013 Views

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHApTER FIvE<br />

According<br />

to these data,<br />

the MDG1 target<br />

to halve the<br />

proportion of<br />

people living in<br />

extreme poverty<br />

by <strong>2015</strong> will be met<br />

at the global level.<br />

But if China’s<br />

extraordinary<br />

success is factored<br />

out, it is unlikely<br />

that developing<br />

countries will<br />

achieve this target.<br />

68<br />

according to these data, the mDG1 target to<br />

halve the proportion of people living in extreme<br />

poverty by <strong>2015</strong> will be met at the global level. but<br />

if china’s extraordinary success is factored out, it is<br />

unlikely that developing countries will achieve this<br />

target (ravallion, 2012). Indeed, only four of the 33<br />

lDcs <strong>for</strong> which data are available are likely to do<br />

so (unctaD, 2011: 3). 49<br />

If the $2 a day poverty line is used, however, the<br />

fall in poverty is much less striking. Indeed, there<br />

is considerable ‘bunching’ of incomes between<br />

the two poverty lines: the number of people living<br />

between them almost doubled from 648 million to<br />

1.18 billion between 1981 <strong>an</strong>d 2008. this suggests<br />

that these people remain vulnerable to becoming<br />

extremely poor. 50<br />

Source: PovcalNet, 2012<br />

EuropE<strong>an</strong> rEport on DEvElopmEnt 2013<br />

In 2008, 96% of the 1.3 billion people who<br />

remained extremely poor lived in East asia, South<br />

asia <strong>an</strong>d SSa (chen <strong>an</strong>d ravallion, 2012). owing<br />

to the size of the populations of china <strong>an</strong>d India,<br />

almost half of all global poverty is concentrated<br />

in those two countries according to 2008 data. In<br />

that year, there were more people living in extreme<br />

poverty in India th<strong>an</strong> in the whole of SSa (loewe<br />

<strong>an</strong>d rippin, 2012). according to the $2 a day<br />

measure, 2.5 billion people remain poor, or over<br />

40% of the population of developing countries. the<br />

pace of poverty reduction has been dramatic, but<br />

further ef<strong>for</strong>ts are clearly needed. particular groups<br />

of countries such as the lDcs need continuing<br />

attention. the gap between fragile <strong>an</strong>d conflictaffected<br />

states <strong>an</strong>d other developing countries is<br />

also widening (World b<strong>an</strong>k, 2011). <strong>an</strong>y successor to<br />

Figure 5.2 Evolution of depth of poverty, $1.25 a day poverty line, 1990–2008<br />

-18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2<br />

Poverty Gap Sq. Poverty Gap<br />

East Asia <strong>an</strong>d Pacific<br />

South Asia<br />

Sub-Sahar<strong>an</strong> Africa<br />

Latin America <strong>an</strong>d the Caribbe<strong>an</strong><br />

Middle East <strong>an</strong>d North Africa<br />

Europe <strong>an</strong>d Central Asia<br />

49 unctaD (2011), on the basis of data from Karshenas (2010), predicts that 439 million people in lDcs will be extremely poor in <strong>2015</strong>, as<br />

opposed to 255 million if mDG1 were met. For <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis of how mDG targets are ‘unfair’ to poorer countries, see Easterly (2009) <strong>an</strong>d Klasen<br />

(<strong>for</strong>thcoming). the 4 lDcs that are on track to meet mDG1 are cambodia, laos, lesotho <strong>an</strong>d Yemen (unctaD, 2010: 38)<br />

50 http://siteresources.worldb<strong>an</strong>k.org/IntpovcalnEt/resources/<strong>Global</strong>_poverty_update_2012_02-29-12.pdf.<br />

0<br />

Total

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!