Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
crops (ErD, 2012). at the same time, there is much<br />
potential <strong>for</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>nelling common interests <strong>an</strong>d<br />
seizing opportunities to work on specific global<br />
public goods issues such as disease eradication,<br />
renewable energy, food security or maritime<br />
govern<strong>an</strong>ce, where both international cooperation<br />
<strong>an</strong>d fin<strong>an</strong>ce are needed. the experience <strong>an</strong>d<br />
trust built up by working together in areas where<br />
cooperation is easier might help in resolving more<br />
difficult conflicts in other areas.<br />
there is a long-st<strong>an</strong>ding <strong>an</strong>d import<strong>an</strong>t dilemma<br />
in the political economy of development cooperation<br />
regarding donor preferences. How c<strong>an</strong> trade-offs<br />
between different legitimate but contradictory<br />
interests be reconciled, such as that between aid<br />
effectiveness <strong>an</strong>d tied aid? How c<strong>an</strong> economic <strong>an</strong>d<br />
development interests be ch<strong>an</strong>nelled through policy<br />
in order to achieve mutual benefits? this question<br />
is particularly pertinent to the private sector: as<br />
developing countries <strong>an</strong>d regions have become<br />
wealthier <strong>an</strong>d more integrated into the global<br />
economy, they have increasingly been seen as l<strong>an</strong>ds<br />
of economic opportunity. this is m<strong>an</strong>ifest in the<br />
growing interest of Western comp<strong>an</strong>ies in engaging<br />
with developing countries, particularly in africa,<br />
beyond their traditional interest in natural resources<br />
(Wonacott, 2011). the uSa retailer Walmart, <strong>for</strong><br />
example, has established a presence in South africa<br />
<strong>an</strong>d is looking to consolidate its long-term grocery<br />
business in several other afric<strong>an</strong> countries (reuters,<br />
2012). Germ<strong>an</strong> infrastructure <strong>an</strong>d technology gi<strong>an</strong>t<br />
Siemens has increased its presence in africa in<br />
the last decade, focusing on urb<strong>an</strong> infrastructure,<br />
green energy <strong>an</strong>d healthcare. It is to be expected<br />
that business interests influence government policy.<br />
In July 2011 the <strong>for</strong>mer uK Secretary of State<br />
<strong>for</strong> Development, <strong>an</strong>drew mitchell, <strong>an</strong>nounced<br />
that ‘africa is open <strong>for</strong> business’ (mitchell, 2011).<br />
Germ<strong>an</strong>y’s mid-2011 afrika Konzept stated that<br />
economic cooperation would be a top priority in the<br />
future relationship, <strong>an</strong>d envisaged increased trade<br />
ties with africa <strong>an</strong>d new markets <strong>for</strong> Germ<strong>an</strong> exports<br />
(bundesregierung, 2011). However, as discussed in<br />
chapter 8, the interests of <strong>for</strong>eign investors need<br />
to be carefully bal<strong>an</strong>ced with those of developing<br />
countries <strong>an</strong>d their development priorities.<br />
among developing countries, there are major<br />
questions regarding what kind of policy re<strong>for</strong>ms<br />
they wish to implement. as discussed in chapter<br />
2 the policies governments pursue are the product<br />
of a complex interaction between structures,<br />
institutions <strong>an</strong>d actors. the preferences of org<strong>an</strong>ised<br />
social groups r<strong>an</strong>ge across a wide spectrum<br />
from building more tr<strong>an</strong>sparent, accountable<br />
systems capable of delivering public goods <strong>an</strong>d<br />
reducing socioeconomic inequality to interests in<br />
maintaining elite-dominated political processes<br />
where the privileged few seek <strong>an</strong> even bigger slice<br />
of the pie. Questions of who gets what <strong>an</strong>d how<br />
this is org<strong>an</strong>ised are particularly salient in conflictaffected<br />
<strong>an</strong>d fragile countries. In most developing (as<br />
in most industrialised) countries, domestic politics<br />
is about reconciling these preferences. International<br />
cooperation also involves domestic trade-offs, such<br />
as between meeting the costs of providing public<br />
goods with diffuse benefits <strong>an</strong>d compensating the<br />
clientelist interests of specific social groups.<br />
4.3 What institutional outcomes<br />
are likely?<br />
the international system is characterised by<br />
sometimes fractious relations between interestdriven<br />
<strong>an</strong>d competitive politics, on the one h<strong>an</strong>d,<br />
<strong>an</strong>d interdependence <strong>an</strong>d the need <strong>for</strong> cooperation<br />
on global issues <strong>an</strong>d public policies on the other.<br />
as ‘new’ actors gain the power to pursue their<br />
preferences in global bargaining processes, the<br />
task of designing institutions capable of bal<strong>an</strong>cing<br />
these heterogeneous goals becomes more uncertain,<br />
difficult <strong>an</strong>d complex (page, 2008).<br />
ch<strong>an</strong>ges in actors’ ability to pursue their<br />
preferences are starting to result in ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the<br />
institutional settings through which they cooperate.<br />
poSt-<strong>2015</strong>: <strong>Global</strong> actIon For <strong>an</strong> IncluSIvE <strong>an</strong>D SuStaInablE FuturE<br />
There is a longst<strong>an</strong>ding<br />
<strong>an</strong>d<br />
import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
dilemma in the<br />
political economy<br />
of development<br />
cooperation<br />
regarding donor<br />
preferences. How<br />
c<strong>an</strong> trade-offs<br />
between different<br />
legitimate but<br />
contradictory<br />
interests be<br />
reconciled?<br />
61