Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 6.1 Poverty projections<br />
expected to continue to 15% in <strong>2015</strong> <strong>an</strong>d 12.8% in<br />
2020. 66 these trends already take into account the<br />
impact of the global economic crisis. However, in a<br />
more pessimistic scenario of slower growth, world<br />
poverty would reach 18.5% in <strong>2015</strong> <strong>an</strong>d 16.3% in<br />
2020. For SSa, poverty fell from 57.6% in 1990 to<br />
50.9% in 2005 <strong>an</strong>d it is expected to drop to 32.8%<br />
in 2020. again, a slower growth scenario would<br />
hold back poverty reduction to 43.8% in <strong>2015</strong> <strong>an</strong>d<br />
39.9% in 2020. In order to reach the mDG1 targets,<br />
poverty in SSa would need to be below 29% by <strong>2015</strong>.<br />
poverty in South asia is projected to fall from 40.3%<br />
in 2005 to 19.4% in 2020 (the values <strong>for</strong> India are<br />
fairly comparable). In East asia <strong>an</strong>d the pacific<br />
(Eap), poverty is expected to decline from 16.8%<br />
in 2005 to 4% in 2020 (the estimates <strong>for</strong> china are<br />
quite similar). obviously, these reductions will be<br />
less pronounced in a more pessimistic scenario.<br />
Finally, Hillebr<strong>an</strong>d (2010a) makes a longer <strong>for</strong>ecast<br />
<strong>for</strong> poverty. the optimistic scenario suggests that<br />
world poverty could fall from 21.3% in 2005 to about<br />
13.3% in <strong>2015</strong> <strong>an</strong>d 2.6% in 2050. Sub-Sahar<strong>an</strong> africa<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>dy <strong>an</strong>d Gertz World B<strong>an</strong>k<br />
2005 2010 <strong>2015</strong> 2005 2010 <strong>2015</strong> 2020<br />
East asia <strong>an</strong>d pacific 16.8 7.4 2.7 16.8 .. 5.9 4.0<br />
china 15.9 .. 0.3 15.9 .. 5.1 4.0<br />
Europe <strong>an</strong>d central asia 3.4 1.8 0.9 3.7 .. 1.7 1.2<br />
latin america <strong>an</strong>d caribbe<strong>an</strong> 8.4 6.2 4.5 8.2 .. 5.0 4.3<br />
middle East <strong>an</strong>d north africa 3.8 2.5 1.9 3.6 .. 1.8 1.5<br />
South asia 40.2 20.3 8.7 40.3 .. 22.8 19.4<br />
India 41.6 .. 7.0 41.6 .. 23.6 20.3<br />
Sub-Sahar<strong>an</strong> africa 54.5 46.9 39.3 50.9 .. 38.0 32.8<br />
World 25.7 15.8 9.9 25.2 .. 15.0 12.8<br />
Source: ch<strong>an</strong>dy <strong>an</strong>d Gertz, 2011; World b<strong>an</strong>k, 2010<br />
would reduce poverty from 50.9% in 2005 to 41.1% in<br />
<strong>2015</strong> <strong>an</strong>d 11.7% in 2050. china <strong>an</strong>d India would halve<br />
their 2005 poverty headcount ratios by <strong>2015</strong> (to 7.6%<br />
<strong>an</strong>d 19.8% respectively) <strong>an</strong>d nearly eradicate extreme<br />
poverty by 2050. the world’s Gini coefficient would<br />
decline from 0.684 to 0.648 respectively. In a slowgrowth<br />
scenario world poverty would remain at<br />
12% by 2050, with SSa experiencing <strong>an</strong> increase in<br />
extreme poverty to 53.1% in 2050, while the world’s<br />
Gini coefficient would decline marginally to 0.679.<br />
While most studies project a continuing decline<br />
in global poverty (even at the regional level), the<br />
pace at which this will take place will depend on a<br />
r<strong>an</strong>ge of factors, including the level <strong>an</strong>d distribution<br />
of economic growth. It should also be noted that<br />
the main discrep<strong>an</strong>cies relate to the pace of poverty<br />
reduction in India <strong>an</strong>d, to a lesser extent, china. For<br />
example, the ch<strong>an</strong>dy <strong>an</strong>d Gertz (2011) projections<br />
are more optimistic th<strong>an</strong> those produced by the<br />
World b<strong>an</strong>k (2010), while those from Hillebr<strong>an</strong>d<br />
(2010a) are often in between those two. nonetheless,<br />
the observation that global extreme poverty will<br />
66 these are fairly similar to the figures presented in World b<strong>an</strong>k (2012), used in chapter 1, but this earlier source also includes <strong>for</strong>ecasts <strong>for</strong> china<br />
<strong>an</strong>d India.<br />
poSt-<strong>2015</strong>: <strong>Global</strong> actIon For <strong>an</strong> IncluSIvE <strong>an</strong>D SuStaInablE FuturE<br />
While most<br />
studies project<br />
a continuing<br />
decline in global<br />
poverty (even<br />
at the regional<br />
level), the pace<br />
at which this<br />
will take place<br />
will depend on a<br />
r<strong>an</strong>ge of factors,<br />
including the level<br />
<strong>an</strong>d distribution<br />
of economic<br />
growth.<br />
93