Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
economies are structurally marginalised from<br />
global production processes, vulnerable to external<br />
shocks <strong>an</strong>d lack the capacity (institutional, hum<strong>an</strong><br />
<strong>an</strong>d physical) to deal effectively with development<br />
challenges. as a result, poverty affects a sizeable<br />
proportion of their population, <strong>an</strong>d external<br />
support will not be effective <strong>an</strong>d sustainable<br />
without tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>ming the economies on which<br />
people depend. a new global development agenda<br />
should mobilise all countries to focus on helping<br />
marginalised <strong>an</strong>d vulnerable economies.<br />
this chapter has discussed the trade <strong>an</strong>d<br />
investment challenges faced by such economies,<br />
including the fact that m<strong>an</strong>y of them continue to<br />
depend on a h<strong>an</strong>dful of commodities. While this<br />
increases their vulnerability to external shocks,<br />
the volatility it invites also has far-reaching<br />
implications beyond trade <strong>an</strong>d investment. at<br />
the same time, in a virtuous circle, commodities<br />
c<strong>an</strong> also present opportunities <strong>an</strong>d resources <strong>for</strong><br />
economic development. the real need is, there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
to increase production capabilities in marginalised<br />
economies. In a context of pervasive market <strong>an</strong>d<br />
coordination failures, who will champion such<br />
policies? the overwhelming evidence points to the<br />
role of a developmental state (see chapter 2).<br />
While trade <strong>an</strong>d investment policies <strong>for</strong> achieving<br />
structural tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>mation will have to be tailored<br />
to each national situation, the global context will<br />
be equally import<strong>an</strong>t. this is because of increasing<br />
interdependence, which me<strong>an</strong>s that the global<br />
context must enable marginalised economies<br />
to adopt appropriate policies. For inst<strong>an</strong>ce, this<br />
chapter has argued that the stalling of multilateral<br />
trade talks, with a corresponding proliferation<br />
of regional <strong>an</strong>d bilateral approaches, is likely to<br />
marginalise the weaker economies. Despite that<br />
caveat, it is also acknowledged that developmental<br />
regionalism that involves using regional approaches<br />
to integrate into the global economy is import<strong>an</strong>t<br />
(e.g. regional approaches to addressing traderelated<br />
infrastructure, harmonising st<strong>an</strong>dards,<br />
<strong>an</strong>d improving cross-border movement of goods,<br />
services <strong>an</strong>d people).<br />
ch<strong>an</strong>ges in global trade <strong>an</strong>d investment flows<br />
<strong>an</strong>d policies will set the backdrop <strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong>y post-<br />
<strong>2015</strong> development agenda. there is a notable shift<br />
in trade <strong>an</strong>d investment flows from north–South<br />
to South–South. these shifts are re-orienting the<br />
global division of labour, with the emergence of<br />
asia as the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing hub (Section 8.3.1). most<br />
asi<strong>an</strong> lDcs, but not all (e.g. nepal <strong>an</strong>d my<strong>an</strong>mar),<br />
have actively integrated into these new production<br />
networks. once they are in the network, m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
have strategically picked up production processes<br />
as they moved downstream to maintain price<br />
competitiveness. this is not happening to the same<br />
extent among lDcs in africa, where most continue<br />
to trade in commodities.<br />
this suggests that <strong>for</strong> trade <strong>an</strong>d investment<br />
policies to contribute to structural economic<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>mation needs the international community<br />
to support marginalised <strong>an</strong>d vulnerable economies:<br />
(1) to promote modern-sector exports; (2) reduce<br />
vulnerability to external shocks; (3) enh<strong>an</strong>ce<br />
productive investments; <strong>an</strong>d (4) improve global<br />
coordination on investment policies. the following<br />
section elaborates on these in turn <strong>an</strong>d discusses<br />
what specific roles the Eu could play.<br />
8.6.1 Promoting modern-sector exports<br />
as this chapter has shown, poor countries are<br />
currently marginalised from more dynamic <strong>for</strong>ms<br />
of trade, with rather limited integration into Gvcs<br />
<strong>an</strong>d Gpns. the experience of countries that have<br />
successfully tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>med their economies – within<br />
<strong>an</strong> unprecedentedly short time – shows the central<br />
import<strong>an</strong>ce of promoting modern-sector exports as<br />
part of <strong>an</strong> overall strategy <strong>for</strong> growth <strong>an</strong>d structural<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>mation, alongside a favourable trade policy<br />
environment.<br />
the adverse potential macroeconomic effects<br />
of commodity dependence, as well as oDa flows<br />
poSt-<strong>2015</strong>: <strong>Global</strong> actIon For <strong>an</strong> IncluSIvE <strong>an</strong>D SuStaInablE FuturE<br />
Ch<strong>an</strong>ges in<br />
global trade <strong>an</strong>d<br />
investment flows<br />
<strong>an</strong>d policies will<br />
set the backdrop<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong>y post-<strong>2015</strong><br />
development<br />
agenda.<br />
161