Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHApTER EIgHT<br />
The share of trade<br />
in services in GDP<br />
of MICs over the<br />
1990–2011 period<br />
was about 24%.<br />
This is <strong>an</strong><br />
indication of the<br />
extent to which<br />
trade in services<br />
could exp<strong>an</strong>d<br />
in LICs.<br />
154<br />
2011, trade in services accounted <strong>for</strong> about 17%<br />
on average. 102 up to 2003, the average was 15%<br />
<strong>an</strong>d much of the growth in the share of trade in<br />
services in GDp took place between then <strong>an</strong>d 2007.<br />
It has been declining since 2008. Growth <strong>an</strong>d then<br />
decline in trade in services could be a reflection<br />
of ch<strong>an</strong>ges in FDI flows to lIcs, particularly the<br />
fin<strong>an</strong>cialisation of commodities <strong>an</strong>d investments in<br />
extractive industries (see Section 8.3.2), although it<br />
could also be due to a high increase in GDp growth.<br />
the share of trade in services in GDp of mIcs over<br />
the 1990–2011 period was about 24%. this is <strong>an</strong><br />
indication of the extent to which trade in services<br />
could exp<strong>an</strong>d in lIcs, with the associated increases<br />
in income <strong>an</strong>d economic exp<strong>an</strong>sion.<br />
Services, <strong>an</strong>d in particular trade in services, are<br />
import<strong>an</strong>t <strong>for</strong> promoting hum<strong>an</strong> development, such<br />
as improvements in education <strong>an</strong>d health (cali et<br />
al., 2008). trade in services in health <strong>an</strong>d education<br />
is particularly import<strong>an</strong>t in SIDS, where there are<br />
few local providers (basnett, 2008 <strong>an</strong>d 2007). the<br />
potential of trade in services to promote inclusive<br />
<strong>an</strong>d sustainable development remains restricted,<br />
however, mainly because of institutional (rules)<br />
<strong>an</strong>d policy barriers. 103 For example, very few lIcs<br />
engage in me<strong>an</strong>ingful trade in services agreements<br />
that remove barriers <strong>an</strong>d establish harmonised<br />
systems <strong>an</strong>d st<strong>an</strong>dards. Existing agreements are<br />
mostly at regional or sub-regional levels, whereas<br />
best practices in the services sector are likely to be<br />
from outside the region. Similarly, national policies<br />
often place restrictions on <strong>for</strong>eign providers, either<br />
because strong interest groups c<strong>an</strong> deter policymakers<br />
from undertaking re<strong>for</strong>m <strong>an</strong>d/or because<br />
of the lack of capacity to underst<strong>an</strong>d the impact of<br />
re<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>an</strong>d to design regulations <strong>an</strong>d safeguards.<br />
the lDc waiver in the General agreement on<br />
trade in Services (GatS) agreed in the Wto<br />
in December 2011 opens the way <strong>for</strong> adv<strong>an</strong>ced<br />
EuropE<strong>an</strong> rEport on DEvElopmEnt 2013<br />
economies to give preferential treatment to lDcs<br />
in services trade. <strong>an</strong> area that would benefit lDcs<br />
is the provision of preferential treatment in mode<br />
Iv (or labour mobility) <strong>for</strong> temporary workers<br />
originating from lDcs (see chapter 9). the Eu<br />
could take the lead in designing a preferential<br />
arr<strong>an</strong>gement <strong>for</strong> trade in services with lDcs similar<br />
to the ‘Everything but arms’ initiative 104 on goods.<br />
8.4.4 Stalling at the multilateral level<br />
the Doha Development round of the Wto was<br />
launched in 2001. negotiations remain at <strong>an</strong><br />
impasse, <strong>an</strong>d in view of the current lack of interest<br />
in multilateral solutions, a subst<strong>an</strong>tial breakthrough<br />
is unlikely to be achieved in the immediate future.<br />
Despite this, the interest of some lDcs in the<br />
DDr include securing new duty-free <strong>an</strong>d quotafree<br />
(DFQF) market access across 100% of product<br />
lines in developed-country markets, agreement on<br />
trade facilitation, ensuring the adequate provision<br />
of trade-related assist<strong>an</strong>ce, as well as requiring some<br />
agreement on specific product <strong>an</strong>d commodity<br />
lines, such as cotton. While the issue of trade at the<br />
multilateral level relates directly to the DDr <strong>an</strong>d<br />
the Wto, there are other multilateral plat<strong>for</strong>ms<br />
<strong>for</strong> other global issues, such as climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge,<br />
that have also stalled. the fact that there has been<br />
so little progress might suggest that it is not trade<br />
multilateralism as such which is at <strong>an</strong> impasse, but<br />
rather multilateralism in general as <strong>an</strong> approach to<br />
addressing global issues.<br />
the lack of <strong>an</strong> active multilateral framework is<br />
likely to most disadv<strong>an</strong>tage <strong>an</strong>d further marginalise<br />
the lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs. a multilateral process is more<br />
likely th<strong>an</strong> bilateral <strong>an</strong>d regional approaches to<br />
be more inclusive <strong>an</strong>d dilute power hierarchies,<br />
while the outcomes are less likely to marginalise<br />
the interests of weak economies (Keoh<strong>an</strong>e <strong>an</strong>d nye,<br />
1985). but it is also import<strong>an</strong>t <strong>for</strong> multilateralism to<br />
address new global development challenges <strong>an</strong>d<br />
103 For a detailed discussion on constraints to trade in services in developing countries (see te velde, 2005).<br />
104 the Eba initiative allows lDcs to export agricultural <strong>an</strong>d m<strong>an</strong>ufactured products to Eu markets duty free <strong>an</strong>d quota free (see Europe<strong>an</strong> commission,<br />
2012d).