Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHApTER EIgHT<br />
8<br />
A major limitation<br />
of the MDGs is<br />
that they failed<br />
to include<br />
dimensions<br />
of structural<br />
economic<br />
tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
or to integrate<br />
the development<br />
of productive<br />
capacities in poor<br />
countries.<br />
138<br />
gOODS: TRADE AnD InvESTmEnT<br />
8.1 Introduction<br />
This chapter discusses the role of trade<br />
<strong>an</strong>d investment policies in a post-<strong>2015</strong><br />
development framework. as discussed in<br />
chapter 1, a major limitation of the mDGs<br />
is that they failed to include dimensions of<br />
structural economic tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>mation or to integrate<br />
the development of productive capacities in poor<br />
countries. this me<strong>an</strong>s that while the mDGs address<br />
some of the social aspects of development, they do not<br />
pay sufficient attention to economic development.<br />
as a result, the long-term sustainability of the social<br />
achievements remains questionable.<br />
the discussion is situated in the ch<strong>an</strong>ging<br />
l<strong>an</strong>dscape of trade <strong>an</strong>d investment <strong>an</strong>d the<br />
challenges faced by marginalised, vulnerable<br />
economies, namely low-income <strong>an</strong>d least developed<br />
countries (lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs). the chapter argues that<br />
the import<strong>an</strong>t shifts that are taking place will shape<br />
the context <strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong>y post-<strong>2015</strong> global framework.<br />
For inst<strong>an</strong>ce, emerging economies now account<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong> increasing share of the trade <strong>an</strong>d investment<br />
portfolios of lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs. asia has emerged<br />
as a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing hub with the evolution of<br />
global value chains (Gvcs) <strong>an</strong>d global production<br />
networks (Gpns). this evolving global context<br />
presents both opportunities <strong>an</strong>d challenges <strong>for</strong><br />
marginalised <strong>an</strong>d vulnerable economies.<br />
Few of these economic challenges are new: the lack<br />
of production <strong>an</strong>d trade diversification, dependence<br />
on commodities, small <strong>an</strong>d underdeveloped<br />
EuropE<strong>an</strong> rEport on DEvElopmEnt 2013<br />
markets, poor infrastructure inhibiting regional<br />
<strong>an</strong>d global connectivity, shallow trade integration<br />
<strong>an</strong>d weak institutional capacities, are all familiar<br />
<strong>an</strong>d yet remain key issues <strong>for</strong> marginalised <strong>an</strong>d<br />
vulnerable economies. the chapter argues that<br />
the lack of <strong>an</strong> effective economic dimension in the<br />
mDG framework allowed m<strong>an</strong>y of these challenges<br />
to persist, which in turn undermines the mDG<br />
achievements in the social sector. the overwhelming<br />
need, there<strong>for</strong>e, is <strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong>y post-<strong>2015</strong> framework to<br />
address these existing problems in the light of the<br />
ch<strong>an</strong>ging global economic l<strong>an</strong>dscape <strong>an</strong>d pressing<br />
environmental challenges. the chapter calls <strong>for</strong><br />
such <strong>an</strong> agenda to focus on helping lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs<br />
to gain productive capacity <strong>an</strong>d achieve structural<br />
economic tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>mation by leveraging trade <strong>an</strong>d<br />
investment policies.<br />
notwithst<strong>an</strong>ding the increasing role of emerging<br />
economies in lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs, particularly via SSc,<br />
the Eu continues to be import<strong>an</strong>t <strong>for</strong> them – as a<br />
market <strong>for</strong> their exports, as a source of investment<br />
<strong>an</strong>d as a major donor. It there<strong>for</strong>e matters both what<br />
the Eu has done to date <strong>an</strong>d what it decides to do<br />
after <strong>2015</strong>. Import<strong>an</strong>t Eu policy ch<strong>an</strong>ges will have<br />
major implications <strong>for</strong> lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs <strong>an</strong>d need to<br />
be factored into the discussions on the Eu’s role in<br />
<strong>an</strong>y post-<strong>2015</strong> development agenda. these ch<strong>an</strong>ges<br />
relate to Economic partnership agreements (Epas),<br />
re<strong>for</strong>m to Eu’s Generalised System of preferences<br />
(GSp), policies on commodities <strong>an</strong>d investment,<br />
<strong>an</strong>d climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge.