02.07.2013 Views

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHApTER EIgHT<br />

8<br />

A major limitation<br />

of the MDGs is<br />

that they failed<br />

to include<br />

dimensions<br />

of structural<br />

economic<br />

tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

or to integrate<br />

the development<br />

of productive<br />

capacities in poor<br />

countries.<br />

138<br />

gOODS: TRADE AnD InvESTmEnT<br />

8.1 Introduction<br />

This chapter discusses the role of trade<br />

<strong>an</strong>d investment policies in a post-<strong>2015</strong><br />

development framework. as discussed in<br />

chapter 1, a major limitation of the mDGs<br />

is that they failed to include dimensions of<br />

structural economic tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>mation or to integrate<br />

the development of productive capacities in poor<br />

countries. this me<strong>an</strong>s that while the mDGs address<br />

some of the social aspects of development, they do not<br />

pay sufficient attention to economic development.<br />

as a result, the long-term sustainability of the social<br />

achievements remains questionable.<br />

the discussion is situated in the ch<strong>an</strong>ging<br />

l<strong>an</strong>dscape of trade <strong>an</strong>d investment <strong>an</strong>d the<br />

challenges faced by marginalised, vulnerable<br />

economies, namely low-income <strong>an</strong>d least developed<br />

countries (lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs). the chapter argues that<br />

the import<strong>an</strong>t shifts that are taking place will shape<br />

the context <strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong>y post-<strong>2015</strong> global framework.<br />

For inst<strong>an</strong>ce, emerging economies now account<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong> increasing share of the trade <strong>an</strong>d investment<br />

portfolios of lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs. asia has emerged<br />

as a m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing hub with the evolution of<br />

global value chains (Gvcs) <strong>an</strong>d global production<br />

networks (Gpns). this evolving global context<br />

presents both opportunities <strong>an</strong>d challenges <strong>for</strong><br />

marginalised <strong>an</strong>d vulnerable economies.<br />

Few of these economic challenges are new: the lack<br />

of production <strong>an</strong>d trade diversification, dependence<br />

on commodities, small <strong>an</strong>d underdeveloped<br />

EuropE<strong>an</strong> rEport on DEvElopmEnt 2013<br />

markets, poor infrastructure inhibiting regional<br />

<strong>an</strong>d global connectivity, shallow trade integration<br />

<strong>an</strong>d weak institutional capacities, are all familiar<br />

<strong>an</strong>d yet remain key issues <strong>for</strong> marginalised <strong>an</strong>d<br />

vulnerable economies. the chapter argues that<br />

the lack of <strong>an</strong> effective economic dimension in the<br />

mDG framework allowed m<strong>an</strong>y of these challenges<br />

to persist, which in turn undermines the mDG<br />

achievements in the social sector. the overwhelming<br />

need, there<strong>for</strong>e, is <strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong>y post-<strong>2015</strong> framework to<br />

address these existing problems in the light of the<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ging global economic l<strong>an</strong>dscape <strong>an</strong>d pressing<br />

environmental challenges. the chapter calls <strong>for</strong><br />

such <strong>an</strong> agenda to focus on helping lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs<br />

to gain productive capacity <strong>an</strong>d achieve structural<br />

economic tr<strong>an</strong>s<strong>for</strong>mation by leveraging trade <strong>an</strong>d<br />

investment policies.<br />

notwithst<strong>an</strong>ding the increasing role of emerging<br />

economies in lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs, particularly via SSc,<br />

the Eu continues to be import<strong>an</strong>t <strong>for</strong> them – as a<br />

market <strong>for</strong> their exports, as a source of investment<br />

<strong>an</strong>d as a major donor. It there<strong>for</strong>e matters both what<br />

the Eu has done to date <strong>an</strong>d what it decides to do<br />

after <strong>2015</strong>. Import<strong>an</strong>t Eu policy ch<strong>an</strong>ges will have<br />

major implications <strong>for</strong> lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs <strong>an</strong>d need to<br />

be factored into the discussions on the Eu’s role in<br />

<strong>an</strong>y post-<strong>2015</strong> development agenda. these ch<strong>an</strong>ges<br />

relate to Economic partnership agreements (Epas),<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m to Eu’s Generalised System of preferences<br />

(GSp), policies on commodities <strong>an</strong>d investment,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!