Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
labour org<strong>an</strong>ization (Ilo) refers to as a rising<br />
global trend in work-related migration, such as<br />
growing irregular migration in the face of rising<br />
cross-border barriers to labour mobility, problems<br />
with the protection of hum<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d labour rights<br />
<strong>an</strong>d migr<strong>an</strong>ts’ exposure to abuse <strong>an</strong>d exploitation.<br />
the multilateral Framework draws on the Ilo’s<br />
flagship programme on decent work (basnett, 2012)<br />
<strong>an</strong>d is based on st<strong>an</strong>dards already contained in Ilo<br />
conventions. monitoring mech<strong>an</strong>isms on migr<strong>an</strong>ts’<br />
rights of treatment include the Ilo committee<br />
of Experts on the application of St<strong>an</strong>dards <strong>an</strong>d<br />
recommendations (cEacr), which supervises the<br />
Ilo conventions, <strong>an</strong>d the un committee on the<br />
protection of the rights of all migr<strong>an</strong>t Workers<br />
<strong>an</strong>d members of their Families.<br />
9.4.1 United Nations Convention on<br />
the Rights of All Migr<strong>an</strong>ts<br />
the united nations International convention on<br />
the protection of the rights of all migr<strong>an</strong>t Workers<br />
<strong>an</strong>d members of their Families (cmW) establishes<br />
universal economic, social <strong>an</strong>d cultural rights <strong>an</strong>d<br />
certain civil <strong>an</strong>d political hum<strong>an</strong> rights pertaining<br />
to migr<strong>an</strong>t workers <strong>an</strong>d their families. It dates back<br />
to 1976, when the united nations’ Economic <strong>an</strong>d<br />
Social council (EcoSoc) raised concerns about<br />
illicit <strong>an</strong>d cl<strong>an</strong>destine labour migration <strong>an</strong>d the<br />
discriminatory treatment of migr<strong>an</strong>t workers in<br />
host countries (basnett, 2012). While reaffirming<br />
core hum<strong>an</strong> rights, the convention also recognises<br />
rights that are specific to the context of migr<strong>an</strong>t<br />
workers <strong>an</strong>d their families. 141<br />
Its effectiveness in upholding the rights of migr<strong>an</strong>t<br />
workers has been constrained by slow ratification<br />
– only 46 out of a total of 193 countries have done<br />
so (basnett, 2012). countries that have ratified<br />
are mostly sending countries, while respect <strong>for</strong><br />
the rights of labour migr<strong>an</strong>ts is likely to be more<br />
import<strong>an</strong>t in receiving countries. a number of the<br />
latter have opted against ratification because of the<br />
convention’s breadth <strong>an</strong>d complexity, the technical<br />
<strong>an</strong>d fin<strong>an</strong>cial obligations, the view that it either<br />
contradicts or adds no value to existing national<br />
legislation, <strong>an</strong>d a concern that it provides rights <strong>for</strong><br />
migr<strong>an</strong>ts (especially those with irregular status)<br />
that are not found in existing hum<strong>an</strong> rights treaties<br />
(Khoser, 2010). none of the Eu member States has<br />
ratified, <strong>for</strong> example. nonetheless, the cmW sets<br />
certain norms on which governments <strong>an</strong>d others<br />
advocating <strong>for</strong> the rights of migr<strong>an</strong>t workers c<strong>an</strong><br />
draw (ruhs, 2013).<br />
9.4.2 ILO Conventions <strong>an</strong>d the Multilateral<br />
Framework<br />
In addition to the Ilo core conventions, which<br />
aim to adv<strong>an</strong>ce core labour st<strong>an</strong>dards <strong>for</strong> all<br />
workers, Ilo conventions 97 <strong>an</strong>d 143 focus<br />
specifically on the rights of migr<strong>an</strong>t workers. only<br />
48 <strong>an</strong>d 23 countries respectively have ratified them,<br />
which is very modest compared to of other Ilo<br />
conventions <strong>an</strong>d in relation to the total number<br />
of member states (ruhs, 2013). Some countries<br />
are reluct<strong>an</strong>t to ratify these conventions because<br />
certain provisions conflict with national laws, <strong>for</strong><br />
example the right to seek <strong>an</strong>other job in the host<br />
country if a migr<strong>an</strong>t worker is made redund<strong>an</strong>t, <strong>an</strong>d<br />
require governments to assist migr<strong>an</strong>t workers <strong>an</strong>d<br />
ensure equal treatment with nationals in areas such<br />
as remuneration, social security, cultural rights <strong>an</strong>d<br />
access to employment (Kuptsch <strong>an</strong>d martin, 2011).<br />
Even if national labour laws already comply with<br />
the subst<strong>an</strong>ce of the Ilo conventions, migr<strong>an</strong>t<br />
workers may still be denied effective remedy in the<br />
case of violations (Kuptsch <strong>an</strong>d martin, 2011: 38)<br />
unless there are adequate en<strong>for</strong>cement mech<strong>an</strong>isms.<br />
nonetheless, all international labour st<strong>an</strong>dards<br />
141 For inst<strong>an</strong>ce, article 26 recognises the right of migr<strong>an</strong>t workers to join <strong>an</strong>d take part in the meetings <strong>an</strong>d activities of trade unions. article 23<br />
establishes recourse to the protection <strong>an</strong>d assist<strong>an</strong>ce of the consular or diplomatic authorities of their country of origin. article 18 states that<br />
‘migr<strong>an</strong>t workers <strong>an</strong>d members of their families shall have the right to equality with nationals of the State concerned be<strong>for</strong>e the courts <strong>an</strong>d<br />
tribunals’, <strong>an</strong>d article 22 (1) states that ‘migr<strong>an</strong>t workers <strong>an</strong>d members of their family shall not be subject to measures of collective expulsion.<br />
Each case of expulsion shall be examined <strong>an</strong>d decided individually’ (un, 1990).<br />
poSt-<strong>2015</strong>: <strong>Global</strong> actIon For <strong>an</strong> IncluSIvE <strong>an</strong>D SuStaInablE FuturE<br />
The ILO’s nonbinding<br />
Multilateral<br />
Framework on<br />
Labour Migration<br />
contains 15<br />
principles <strong>for</strong><br />
promoting the<br />
rights <strong>an</strong>d welfare<br />
of labour<br />
migr<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d<br />
their families,<br />
providing<br />
‘guidelines <strong>for</strong><br />
a rights-based<br />
approach to<br />
labour migration.<br />
187