02.07.2013 Views

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

labour org<strong>an</strong>ization (Ilo) refers to as a rising<br />

global trend in work-related migration, such as<br />

growing irregular migration in the face of rising<br />

cross-border barriers to labour mobility, problems<br />

with the protection of hum<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d labour rights<br />

<strong>an</strong>d migr<strong>an</strong>ts’ exposure to abuse <strong>an</strong>d exploitation.<br />

the multilateral Framework draws on the Ilo’s<br />

flagship programme on decent work (basnett, 2012)<br />

<strong>an</strong>d is based on st<strong>an</strong>dards already contained in Ilo<br />

conventions. monitoring mech<strong>an</strong>isms on migr<strong>an</strong>ts’<br />

rights of treatment include the Ilo committee<br />

of Experts on the application of St<strong>an</strong>dards <strong>an</strong>d<br />

recommendations (cEacr), which supervises the<br />

Ilo conventions, <strong>an</strong>d the un committee on the<br />

protection of the rights of all migr<strong>an</strong>t Workers<br />

<strong>an</strong>d members of their Families.<br />

9.4.1 United Nations Convention on<br />

the Rights of All Migr<strong>an</strong>ts<br />

the united nations International convention on<br />

the protection of the rights of all migr<strong>an</strong>t Workers<br />

<strong>an</strong>d members of their Families (cmW) establishes<br />

universal economic, social <strong>an</strong>d cultural rights <strong>an</strong>d<br />

certain civil <strong>an</strong>d political hum<strong>an</strong> rights pertaining<br />

to migr<strong>an</strong>t workers <strong>an</strong>d their families. It dates back<br />

to 1976, when the united nations’ Economic <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Social council (EcoSoc) raised concerns about<br />

illicit <strong>an</strong>d cl<strong>an</strong>destine labour migration <strong>an</strong>d the<br />

discriminatory treatment of migr<strong>an</strong>t workers in<br />

host countries (basnett, 2012). While reaffirming<br />

core hum<strong>an</strong> rights, the convention also recognises<br />

rights that are specific to the context of migr<strong>an</strong>t<br />

workers <strong>an</strong>d their families. 141<br />

Its effectiveness in upholding the rights of migr<strong>an</strong>t<br />

workers has been constrained by slow ratification<br />

– only 46 out of a total of 193 countries have done<br />

so (basnett, 2012). countries that have ratified<br />

are mostly sending countries, while respect <strong>for</strong><br />

the rights of labour migr<strong>an</strong>ts is likely to be more<br />

import<strong>an</strong>t in receiving countries. a number of the<br />

latter have opted against ratification because of the<br />

convention’s breadth <strong>an</strong>d complexity, the technical<br />

<strong>an</strong>d fin<strong>an</strong>cial obligations, the view that it either<br />

contradicts or adds no value to existing national<br />

legislation, <strong>an</strong>d a concern that it provides rights <strong>for</strong><br />

migr<strong>an</strong>ts (especially those with irregular status)<br />

that are not found in existing hum<strong>an</strong> rights treaties<br />

(Khoser, 2010). none of the Eu member States has<br />

ratified, <strong>for</strong> example. nonetheless, the cmW sets<br />

certain norms on which governments <strong>an</strong>d others<br />

advocating <strong>for</strong> the rights of migr<strong>an</strong>t workers c<strong>an</strong><br />

draw (ruhs, 2013).<br />

9.4.2 ILO Conventions <strong>an</strong>d the Multilateral<br />

Framework<br />

In addition to the Ilo core conventions, which<br />

aim to adv<strong>an</strong>ce core labour st<strong>an</strong>dards <strong>for</strong> all<br />

workers, Ilo conventions 97 <strong>an</strong>d 143 focus<br />

specifically on the rights of migr<strong>an</strong>t workers. only<br />

48 <strong>an</strong>d 23 countries respectively have ratified them,<br />

which is very modest compared to of other Ilo<br />

conventions <strong>an</strong>d in relation to the total number<br />

of member states (ruhs, 2013). Some countries<br />

are reluct<strong>an</strong>t to ratify these conventions because<br />

certain provisions conflict with national laws, <strong>for</strong><br />

example the right to seek <strong>an</strong>other job in the host<br />

country if a migr<strong>an</strong>t worker is made redund<strong>an</strong>t, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

require governments to assist migr<strong>an</strong>t workers <strong>an</strong>d<br />

ensure equal treatment with nationals in areas such<br />

as remuneration, social security, cultural rights <strong>an</strong>d<br />

access to employment (Kuptsch <strong>an</strong>d martin, 2011).<br />

Even if national labour laws already comply with<br />

the subst<strong>an</strong>ce of the Ilo conventions, migr<strong>an</strong>t<br />

workers may still be denied effective remedy in the<br />

case of violations (Kuptsch <strong>an</strong>d martin, 2011: 38)<br />

unless there are adequate en<strong>for</strong>cement mech<strong>an</strong>isms.<br />

nonetheless, all international labour st<strong>an</strong>dards<br />

141 For inst<strong>an</strong>ce, article 26 recognises the right of migr<strong>an</strong>t workers to join <strong>an</strong>d take part in the meetings <strong>an</strong>d activities of trade unions. article 23<br />

establishes recourse to the protection <strong>an</strong>d assist<strong>an</strong>ce of the consular or diplomatic authorities of their country of origin. article 18 states that<br />

‘migr<strong>an</strong>t workers <strong>an</strong>d members of their families shall have the right to equality with nationals of the State concerned be<strong>for</strong>e the courts <strong>an</strong>d<br />

tribunals’, <strong>an</strong>d article 22 (1) states that ‘migr<strong>an</strong>t workers <strong>an</strong>d members of their family shall not be subject to measures of collective expulsion.<br />

Each case of expulsion shall be examined <strong>an</strong>d decided individually’ (un, 1990).<br />

poSt-<strong>2015</strong>: <strong>Global</strong> actIon For <strong>an</strong> IncluSIvE <strong>an</strong>D SuStaInablE FuturE<br />

The ILO’s nonbinding<br />

Multilateral<br />

Framework on<br />

Labour Migration<br />

contains 15<br />

principles <strong>for</strong><br />

promoting the<br />

rights <strong>an</strong>d welfare<br />

of labour<br />

migr<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d<br />

their families,<br />

providing<br />

‘guidelines <strong>for</strong><br />

a rights-based<br />

approach to<br />

labour migration.<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!