02.07.2013 Views

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHApTER nInE<br />

An import<strong>an</strong>t<br />

question is the<br />

degree to which<br />

international<br />

labour migration<br />

<strong>an</strong>d remitt<strong>an</strong>ces<br />

are inclusive.<br />

176<br />

at the household level, depending on the migr<strong>an</strong>t’s<br />

previous contribution, there may be a need to<br />

replace <strong>for</strong>gone production in order to maintain the<br />

same st<strong>an</strong>dard of living – the so-called ‘lost labour<br />

effect’ (oEcD, 2011:89). this may be especially<br />

pertinent where livelihoods depend on agricultural<br />

labour. but, as argued earlier, lost-labour effects are<br />

generally more th<strong>an</strong> offset by remitt<strong>an</strong>ce income<br />

(oEcD, 2011: 92) as migr<strong>an</strong>t workers in richer<br />

countries tend to earn far more th<strong>an</strong> their ‘identical’<br />

counterparts in poorer countries (ruhs, 2013).<br />

Second, remitt<strong>an</strong>ce income c<strong>an</strong> act as a<br />

disincentive <strong>for</strong> members of recipient households to<br />

participate in the labour market (ratha et al., 2011b),<br />

although there may be more dem<strong>an</strong>d <strong>for</strong> labour<br />

when remitt<strong>an</strong>ces are used <strong>for</strong> productive purposes<br />

(combes et al., 2011: 6; lucas, 2008: 8). labour<br />

migration c<strong>an</strong> thus increase the opportunities<br />

<strong>an</strong>d dem<strong>an</strong>d <strong>for</strong> non-migr<strong>an</strong>t workers. a povertyreducing<br />

effect on non-migr<strong>an</strong>t low-income<br />

workers has been observed by combes et al. (2011),<br />

who show that international labour migration <strong>an</strong>d<br />

remitt<strong>an</strong>ces seem to have subst<strong>an</strong>tially reduced the<br />

share of workers living on less th<strong>an</strong> $2 a day. this<br />

of course mainly depends on the characteristics of<br />

the domestic labour market (lucas, 2008; oEcD,<br />

2011; World b<strong>an</strong>k, 2006).<br />

Inequality issues<br />

<strong>an</strong> import<strong>an</strong>t question is the degree to which<br />

international labour migration <strong>an</strong>d remitt<strong>an</strong>ces<br />

are inclusive. research shows signific<strong>an</strong>t variation<br />

in the impact of remitt<strong>an</strong>ces on income inequality<br />

in migr<strong>an</strong>t-sending countries (black et al., 2006).<br />

In some cases, such as Gh<strong>an</strong>a <strong>an</strong>d nicaragua,<br />

international migration seems to have exacerbated<br />

income inequality (adams et al., 2008; Hobbs <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Jameson, 2012). In general, the poorest do not<br />

migrate because they seldom ‘have the resources to<br />

bear the costs <strong>an</strong>d risks of international migration’<br />

(un, 2006:13). this me<strong>an</strong>s that remitt<strong>an</strong>ces<br />

EuropE<strong>an</strong> rEport on DEvElopmEnt 2013<br />

do not flow to poorest households or to the<br />

poorest countries (unDp, 2009:72) <strong>an</strong>d are often<br />

concentrated in specific regions within countries.<br />

In nepal, however, international labour migration<br />

has equally become a livelihood strategy <strong>for</strong> poorer<br />

families (p<strong>an</strong>dey et al., 2012:106). the fact that<br />

poorer workers tend to migrate within the region<br />

contributes to the fact that international as opposed<br />

to cross-border or regional migration may have<br />

different effects on income inequality in the sending<br />

country. In burkina Faso, <strong>for</strong> inst<strong>an</strong>ce, international<br />

migration tended to increase household income<br />

inequality whereas regional migration seemed to<br />

have had the opposite effect (Wouterse, 2008).<br />

the effect on income inequality in sending<br />

countries could ch<strong>an</strong>ge over time <strong>an</strong>d become more<br />

inclusive as a result of network effects (mcKenzie<br />

<strong>an</strong>d rapoport, 2007). low-skilled migration<br />

is more likely to reduce the severity of poverty<br />

<strong>an</strong>d inequality in the sending countries th<strong>an</strong> is<br />

migration of the higher skilled (Iom, 2008; Ebeke<br />

<strong>an</strong>d le Goff, 2009). the increased possibility of<br />

labour migration <strong>for</strong> poorer households, access to<br />

labour markets as well as a reduction in the costs of<br />

mobility would help to ensure greater equity in <strong>an</strong>y<br />

potential benefits <strong>for</strong> labour migr<strong>an</strong>ts as well as the<br />

sending countries.<br />

the effects of labour migration on income<br />

inequality in sending countries are by no me<strong>an</strong>s<br />

the only aspect of inequality. the impact of labour<br />

migration plays out at different levels <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> have<br />

profound implications <strong>for</strong> households <strong>an</strong>d ruling<br />

elites <strong>an</strong>d also between countries. remitt<strong>an</strong>ces<br />

from diaspora org<strong>an</strong>isations, <strong>for</strong> example, c<strong>an</strong><br />

support local elites <strong>an</strong>d rein<strong>for</strong>ce established power<br />

structures as has been observed with some londonbased<br />

nigeri<strong>an</strong> diaspora. 132 Such contributions may<br />

entrench ‘traditional authority’, power imbal<strong>an</strong>ces<br />

<strong>an</strong>d socioeconomic inequalities in the country of<br />

origin (lampert, 2012).<br />

132 Diaspora org<strong>an</strong>isations are often made up of higher-skilled migr<strong>an</strong>ts, <strong>an</strong>d the nigeri<strong>an</strong> diaspora org<strong>an</strong>isations based in london are maledominated<br />

(lampert, 2012).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!