Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
contribute to a global framework <strong>for</strong> development<br />
<strong>an</strong>d four case studies are used to provide evidence<br />
from developing countries. 8 nepal, rw<strong>an</strong>da,<br />
côte d’Ivoire <strong>an</strong>d peru, though not intended as a<br />
representative sample, were chosen to present a<br />
r<strong>an</strong>ge of development patterns <strong>an</strong>d experiences with<br />
the mDGs, <strong>an</strong>d very different links with the global<br />
economy, international cooperation <strong>an</strong>d the Eu.<br />
the report is structured in three parts each with<br />
three chapters. a final chapter summarises the<br />
conclusions <strong>an</strong>d recommendations.<br />
Part I looks at the experience of the mDGs to date<br />
from different <strong>an</strong>gles. First, it examines the global<br />
experience of the mDGs <strong>an</strong>d what lessons c<strong>an</strong> be<br />
drawn from their use as <strong>an</strong> overarching framework<br />
<strong>for</strong> the reduction of global poverty. It then focuses<br />
on the experience of the mDGs in four developing<br />
countries based on the conclusions of the case<br />
studies conducted in nepal, rw<strong>an</strong>da, côte d’Ivoire<br />
<strong>an</strong>d peru. their experience is looked at in terms<br />
of external <strong>an</strong>d domestic drivers of or barriers to<br />
ch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>an</strong>d development. a third chapter explores<br />
the responses of developed countries to the mDGs,<br />
with, as <strong>an</strong> example, <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis of the Eu’s role in<br />
supporting their achievement.<br />
Part II considers how the world has ch<strong>an</strong>ged since<br />
the millennium Declaration was agreed <strong>an</strong>d the<br />
mDGs devised <strong>an</strong>d adopted. a first step is to look<br />
at ch<strong>an</strong>ges in the political economy of international<br />
cooperation with Southern actors growing in<br />
import<strong>an</strong>ce, the part played by developing countries<br />
themselves, <strong>an</strong>d the ch<strong>an</strong>ging role that traditional<br />
donors are likely to play given recent trends in their<br />
own economies. It also considers ch<strong>an</strong>ging global<br />
patterns of poverty <strong>an</strong>d the role of research in<br />
improving the global underst<strong>an</strong>ding of poverty <strong>an</strong>d<br />
development thinking over the past decade. a third<br />
chapter considers future demographic, economic,<br />
social <strong>an</strong>d environmental trends <strong>an</strong>d the challenges<br />
that a new global framework may there<strong>for</strong>e need<br />
to address.<br />
Part III focuses on the possible basis <strong>for</strong> a new<br />
global partnership <strong>for</strong> development by looking at<br />
three key aspects of global partnership – namely,<br />
flows of money, goods <strong>an</strong>d people – <strong>an</strong>d the<br />
international environment these create in relation<br />
to the ability of developing countries to pursue their<br />
own development priorities. these are considered<br />
in three thematic chapters on development fin<strong>an</strong>ce,<br />
trade <strong>an</strong>d investment, <strong>an</strong>d labour migration that<br />
examine their existing <strong>an</strong>d potential impact on<br />
poverty reduction respectively, <strong>an</strong>d look at the<br />
international policies that govern them.<br />
the concluding chapter discusses the basis <strong>for</strong><br />
a potential new global framework in terms of the<br />
‘beyond mDGs’ <strong>an</strong>d ‘beyond aid’ dimensions.<br />
In other words, what a new post-<strong>2015</strong> global<br />
development framework might usefully encompass<br />
in terms of its objectives <strong>an</strong>d instruments. How,<br />
<strong>for</strong> inst<strong>an</strong>ce, might the objective be broadened to<br />
more adequately promote inclusive <strong>an</strong>d sustainable<br />
development (ISD) <strong>an</strong>d what other fin<strong>an</strong>cial <strong>an</strong>d<br />
policy instruments might complement oDa?<br />
the conclusions also seek to bring together ideas<br />
identified throughout the report on what the Eu<br />
might contribute to international cooperation in the<br />
future, especially in a context of continued fin<strong>an</strong>cial<br />
austerity. In line with its existing commitment<br />
to policy coherence <strong>for</strong> Development, the Eu’s<br />
contribution is considered not just in relation<br />
to oDa but also in terms of its policies in other<br />
spheres that have <strong>an</strong> external impact, <strong>an</strong>d in its<br />
contributions to global public goods (GpGs).<br />
8 the case studies were commissioned from national research institutes in each county. a short summary of each of the case studies is provided<br />
at the end of the report <strong>an</strong>d the full case studies are published on the ErD website. rw<strong>an</strong>da <strong>an</strong>d nepal are lIcs <strong>an</strong>d lDcs, while côte d’Ivoire<br />
is a lmIc. all three are oDa recipients. In contrast, peru is a umIc <strong>an</strong>d receives little oDa (see table 2.2 in chapter 2 <strong>for</strong> basic comparative<br />
indicators). While the Eu has fairly strong links with the two afric<strong>an</strong> countries, these are weaker in nepal <strong>an</strong>d peru. all four countries are<br />
experiencing the growing influence of non-traditional donors such as brazil, china <strong>an</strong>d India.<br />
poSt-<strong>2015</strong>: <strong>Global</strong> actIon For <strong>an</strong> IncluSIvE <strong>an</strong>D SuStaInablE FuturE<br />
Nepal, Rw<strong>an</strong>da,<br />
Côte d’Ivoire <strong>an</strong>d<br />
Peru were chosen<br />
to present a r<strong>an</strong>ge<br />
of development<br />
patterns <strong>an</strong>d<br />
experiences with<br />
the MDGs.<br />
9