02.07.2013 Views

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. The case <strong>for</strong> global collective action<br />

the mDGs have been one of the most successful<br />

attempts ever to encourage global collective<br />

action around a limited set of goals with one core<br />

objective: a signific<strong>an</strong>t reduction of global poverty.<br />

they have come to be central to the way the<br />

international community thinks about, mobilises<br />

support <strong>for</strong>, implements <strong>an</strong>d monitors development<br />

cooperation. Yet the international collective action<br />

they have inspired has limits <strong>an</strong>d the aim to achieve<br />

a global partnership <strong>for</strong> development, as set out in<br />

mDG8, has been one of the least successful. Despite<br />

this, given the increasingly interconnected nature<br />

of the global economy <strong>an</strong>d the scale <strong>an</strong>d urgency<br />

of global challenges, strong international collective<br />

action in a variety of areas remains fundamental<br />

to eradicating global poverty <strong>an</strong>d fulfilling the<br />

millennium Declaration’s promise.<br />

as the mDG deadline approaches, there is<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e a need to review how the momentum<br />

of this international ef<strong>for</strong>t c<strong>an</strong> be sustained <strong>an</strong>d<br />

improved in a ch<strong>an</strong>ging global context. although<br />

countries must retain the policy space to follow<br />

national development agendas, <strong>an</strong>d there are<br />

m<strong>an</strong>y internal factors that encourage or impede<br />

their implementation, it is also import<strong>an</strong>t that<br />

all countries have a conducive international<br />

environment in which to pursue their development<br />

agendas. collective action to achieve this enabling<br />

environment is required in a wider r<strong>an</strong>ge of fields<br />

th<strong>an</strong> just development cooperation. Encouraging<br />

more extensive <strong>an</strong>d reliable international action<br />

<strong>an</strong>d support <strong>for</strong> global development should thus be<br />

a core element of a new post-<strong>2015</strong> framework.<br />

3. The Approach of the Report<br />

the report relies on two notions that are used<br />

extensively throughout. the first relates to the<br />

3 http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/tdxiii_report_en.pdf/.<br />

ultimate purpose of a new framework. For this, the<br />

report adopts the term ‘inclusive <strong>an</strong>d sustainable<br />

development’ (ISD). the second is the question<br />

of how to underst<strong>an</strong>d going ‘beyond mDGs’ <strong>an</strong>d<br />

‘beyond aid’.<br />

<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>an</strong>d sustainable development<br />

the millennium Declaration still provides a<br />

good consensual starting point <strong>for</strong> the post-<strong>2015</strong><br />

debate. the Declaration outlines a broad vision<br />

of development that includes poverty eradication<br />

as well as environmental sustainability, hum<strong>an</strong><br />

security, vulnerability, rights <strong>an</strong>d good govern<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

(see Sections III-vI). this vision c<strong>an</strong> best be<br />

described as inclusive <strong>an</strong>d sustainable development,<br />

a term used in this report to encapsulate what a<br />

potential new global framework ought to set<br />

out to achieve. although the Declaration does<br />

not explicitly refer to inclusive <strong>an</strong>d sustainable<br />

development, the term is now widely used. the<br />

World b<strong>an</strong>k used the term in its 2007 long-term<br />

strategic pl<strong>an</strong>ning exercise, <strong>an</strong>d unctaD adopted<br />

it in a 2011 report. 3 more immediately, the 2010<br />

Europe<strong>an</strong> report on Development was entitled<br />

‘Social Protection <strong>for</strong> <strong>Inclusive</strong> Development’ <strong>an</strong>d<br />

the 2012 report focused on how to attain inclusive<br />

<strong>an</strong>d sustainable growth in a context of growing<br />

scarcity of natural resources. the Europe<strong>an</strong><br />

commission in its Agenda <strong>for</strong> Ch<strong>an</strong>ge (com, 2011)<br />

also uses the term.<br />

the term c<strong>an</strong> perhaps best be understood through<br />

<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>alysis of its three main components:<br />

• <strong>Inclusive</strong>: although several countries have<br />

achieved signific<strong>an</strong>t economic <strong>an</strong>d social<br />

progress <strong>an</strong>d reduced poverty levels, the<br />

benefits have not always been equitably shared.<br />

Economic, social <strong>an</strong>d political exclusion<br />

undermine hum<strong>an</strong> development <strong>an</strong>d threaten<br />

the consolidation of recent gains in poverty<br />

reduction. a focus on inclusiveness requires<br />

poSt-<strong>2015</strong>: <strong>Global</strong> actIon For <strong>an</strong> IncluSIvE <strong>an</strong>D SuStaInablE FuturE<br />

The Declaration<br />

outlines a broad<br />

vision of<br />

development.<br />

This vision c<strong>an</strong><br />

best be described<br />

as inclusive <strong>an</strong>d<br />

sustainable<br />

development.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!