02.07.2013 Views

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

Post 2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHApTER SEvEn<br />

The broad<br />

consensus on<br />

the need to look<br />

beyond ODA to<br />

fin<strong>an</strong>ce climatech<strong>an</strong>ge<br />

adaptation<br />

<strong>an</strong>d mitigation<br />

creates<br />

opportunities<br />

<strong>for</strong> cooperation<br />

beyond aid.<br />

134<br />

Economic <strong>an</strong>d Social Survey 2011, <strong>for</strong> inst<strong>an</strong>ce,<br />

estimates incremental green investment needs in<br />

order to achieve sustainable development objectives<br />

in a context of climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>an</strong>d global carbon<br />

constraints at about 3% of the gross world product<br />

(un DESa, 2011). assuming that some 60% of such<br />

investment will be needed in developing countries,<br />

this implies a little over $1 trillion per year in<br />

additional investment, far above the current <strong>an</strong>nual<br />

$130 billion in oDa. at the same time, diverting a<br />

subst<strong>an</strong>tial amount of oDa towards climate-related<br />

initiatives rather th<strong>an</strong> to other poverty-reducing<br />

interventions might create a misalignment between<br />

global <strong>an</strong>d domestic priorities in developing<br />

countries (un DESa, 2012). to meet the need <strong>for</strong><br />

climate fin<strong>an</strong>cing while avoiding the risk of such<br />

misalignments political leaders agreed in the 2009<br />

unFccc copenhagen accord to cooperate to<br />

mobilise ‘new <strong>an</strong>d additional’ climate funds from<br />

public, private <strong>an</strong>d innovative sources – although<br />

it has yet to agree how to define these resources. 90<br />

Given budget constraints in m<strong>an</strong>y oEcD countries<br />

<strong>an</strong>d the limited commercial viability of m<strong>an</strong>y<br />

climate-related investments, ef<strong>for</strong>ts have focused<br />

on proposals <strong>for</strong> innovative climate fin<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />

the lack of <strong>an</strong> international agreement on<br />

implementing some of the climate fin<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

proposals with the greatest revenue potential<br />

poses a broader challenge <strong>for</strong> cooperation beyond<br />

aid. For inst<strong>an</strong>ce, there is still a lack of support<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong> international, uni<strong>for</strong>m carbon tax, partly<br />

because it would depress some countries’ external<br />

competitiveness (Ward <strong>an</strong>d cao, 2012). Similarly,<br />

there is no international agreement on a global<br />

carbon-trading system, in which developed <strong>an</strong>d<br />

eventually emerging economies could sign up<br />

<strong>for</strong> binding emission-reduction targets. Given<br />

the lack of political support <strong>for</strong> mech<strong>an</strong>isms with<br />

large revenue potential, <strong>an</strong>d tighter budgets in<br />

EuropE<strong>an</strong> rEport on DEvElopmEnt 2013<br />

donor countries, it is likely that in the short term,<br />

a subst<strong>an</strong>tial proportion of publicly subsidised<br />

contributions to climate fin<strong>an</strong>ce will come from<br />

oDa budgets (Kharas <strong>an</strong>d rogerson, 2012).<br />

Despite the political challenges there are several<br />

ways to enh<strong>an</strong>ce cooperation <strong>an</strong>d coordination to<br />

ensure that <strong>an</strong>y new climate fin<strong>an</strong>ce mech<strong>an</strong>isms<br />

support inclusive <strong>an</strong>d sustainable development.<br />

thus development policy-makers should:<br />

1. Enh<strong>an</strong>ce cooperation <strong>an</strong>d coordination to<br />

ensure that developing countries are adequately<br />

represented in govern<strong>an</strong>ce mech<strong>an</strong>isms <strong>for</strong><br />

climate fin<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />

2. Share knowledge about aid effectiveness. In<br />

recent years the proliferation of funds <strong>for</strong> climate<br />

fin<strong>an</strong>ce has resulted in a highly fragmented <strong>an</strong>d<br />

inefficient architecture. Sharing experiences in<br />

aid coordination could help to make climate<br />

fin<strong>an</strong>cing more effective.<br />

3. collaborate to help developing countries to<br />

increase the benefits of climate fin<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>for</strong><br />

inclusive <strong>an</strong>d sustainable development. climate<br />

fin<strong>an</strong>ce is likely to become a major source<br />

of external flows. Strong administrative <strong>an</strong>d<br />

institutional capacities will be needed to access<br />

funds, align them with national priorities <strong>an</strong>d<br />

absorb them, along with a capacity to resist<br />

intrusive conditionalities. as with other large<br />

external flows, their m<strong>an</strong>agement will also<br />

require political capacity <strong>an</strong>d strong govern<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

(arell<strong>an</strong>o-Y<strong>an</strong>guas, 2011).<br />

a post-<strong>2015</strong> global framework that seeks to guide<br />

the provision of GpGs could help to ensure that the<br />

emerging architecture on climate fin<strong>an</strong>ce supports<br />

inclusive <strong>an</strong>d sustainable development. In defining<br />

90 brown et al. (2010) identify the following four definitions of ‘additional’ international public fin<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>for</strong> climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge in the current debate: 1.<br />

climate fin<strong>an</strong>ce classified as oDa additional to the ‘0.7%’ target. 2. Increase 2009 oDa levels spent on climate actions (i.e. 2009 oDa disbursements<br />

on climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge should set the benchmark, above which <strong>an</strong>y new oDa fin<strong>an</strong>ce on climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge measures c<strong>an</strong> be considered additional).<br />

3. rising oDa levels that include climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge fin<strong>an</strong>ce up to a specified percentage. 4. Increase in climate fin<strong>an</strong>ce not connected to oDa (oDa<br />

should continue to be used <strong>for</strong> traditional development activities, <strong>an</strong>d fin<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>for</strong> climate ch<strong>an</strong>ge should come from non-oDa sources).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!