23.10.2013 Views

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138<br />

The approach adopted by the working group is described below:<br />

Identifi cation of mid-term threats and challenges taking into account existing security policy decisions, strategies, and<br />

plans on the <strong>European</strong> and national level<br />

Current and foreseeable primary security challenges, including means and motives of actors (individuals, non-state, and states)<br />

Identifi cation of long-term threats and challenges mainly building on foresight and scenario techniques as well as linking<br />

predictions and expectations about future developments with the focal areas of the <strong>ESRIF</strong> working groups<br />

Identifi cation of required capabilities to enhance security within the scope of <strong>ESRIF</strong>’s considerations<br />

Identifi cation of related research requirements taking into account ongoing and planned programs and work and<br />

prioritization of the research needs<br />

Presentation and communication of the fi ndings<br />

The following reports have been delivered:<br />

WP1: Present to mid-term CBRN security challenges and capability gaps<br />

Identifying current and foreseeable primary security challenges, including means and motives of actors (individuals, nonstate,<br />

and states), in accordance with the CBRN cycle<br />

Capability gaps, structured according to threat assessment, prevention, response, mitigation, and recovery in relation to CBRN<br />

WP2: Key Technological Developments enabling CBRN Development and Deployment in the mid- to long-term Perspectives<br />

(20 y), as a forecast of dual-use potential<br />

WP3: CBRN Long-term Security Challenges and Capability Gaps, identifying<br />

Long-term primary security challenges, including means and motives of actors<br />

Long-term capability gaps, structured according to threat assessment, prevention, response, mitigation, and recovery<br />

WP4: Outlining R&D achievements to fi ll mid- and long-term capability gaps: report with R&D recommendations on how to<br />

address long-term security challenges<br />

WP5: this chapter of the <strong>ESRIF</strong> end-report: Agenda on R&D achievements: strategy to keep R&D eff orts up-to-date with<br />

developing security requirements<br />

WG6 consisted of some fi fty participants coming from thirteen member states plus representatives from EU and the <strong>European</strong><br />

Defence Agency. The following stakeholders were represented: governments (14), industry (13), research institutes (17), and<br />

end users (6). The actual intensity of the contribution of WG6 participants varied widely. Roughly one-third was very active in<br />

attending meetings, participating in discussions, and in writing and reviewing draft reports. Another third of the participants<br />

occasionally contributed in some way, whereas the remainder contributed only in a passive way.<br />

Executive Summary<br />

This chapter on chemical, biological, and radiological incidents and accidents, together with the <strong>European</strong> Security Research &<br />

Innovation Agenda (ESRIA), outlines a timely security research and innovation strategy to provide <strong>European</strong> society with tools<br />

to counter the CBRN threat including tools that will limit the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The scope of WG6<br />

<strong>ESRIF</strong> FINAL REPORT - PART 2 • Working Group: CBRN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!