I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
202<br />
9.3.1.6 Fostering a culture which celebrates innovation<br />
Partnerships between research, industry and end-users are seen as an important enabler to stimulate innovation in the<br />
security domain. For such partnerships to work effi ciently, it is important to build on a well-organised knowledge base and<br />
to establish market conditions, mechanisms and incentives that foster innovation. One example in this context could be<br />
fi eld laboratories.<br />
Independent testing for technology validation<br />
Technological developments are moving fast and the security relevant product portfolio is very wide. In this<br />
labyrinth of technologies, first responders, fire brigades, customs officers and other operators in the field are not<br />
always sufficiently aware of the technology potential and technology readiness to support their operations and can<br />
therefore not access those potential products and services. Therefore, there is a need for independent validation<br />
of technologies. The result must influence the R&D prioritisation in order to enhance the fast implementation of<br />
innovative solutions.<br />
Field labs for validation<br />
The result of the complete innovation chain, starting from R&D will be systems and solutions which should<br />
enhance safety and security, e. g. first responders. However, before implanting such new solutions, Field labs are<br />
needed for the validation (verifying whether it is fit for purpose), i.e. realistic environments for the demonstration,<br />
validation and optimisation of innovative systems for security tasks or meeting points where end-users, security<br />
authorities, industry and the research community can have access to the technological solutions relevant for their<br />
daily work.<br />
Encourage SMEs<br />
SMEs account for 67% of Europe’s private sector employment and represent 99.8% of all <strong>European</strong> enterprises 6 .<br />
They suffer more than large companies from administrative and regulatory burden, lack of access to finance,<br />
taxation, insufficient access to public procurements and research funding, unfair or too strong competition, etc.<br />
This is not specific for the security domain, but <strong>ESRIF</strong> WG 9 does believe that future EU research and innovation<br />
initiatives should be designed so as to alleviate SME problems and to grow SME participation in EU RTD. Specifically<br />
for security research how to stimulate and optimise SME involvement in projects, targeting 25% by 2011, could be<br />
explored.<br />
In addition, security is an extremely broad domain requiring input from most industrial sectors and expert disciplines.<br />
Many SMEs that would normally not operate in the security arena have relevant skills for security applications. This is an<br />
‘untapped potential’. Dedicated initiatives should be undertaken that would encourage more SMEs to enter exploitable<br />
high-tech niche security markets. As such, Europe will drive investment in knowledge and innovation and thereby enhance<br />
its competitiveness. A further benefi t is that this action will improve the competitiveness of large <strong>European</strong> enterprises<br />
by broadening and deepening the pool of potential partner SMEs. <strong>ESRIF</strong> recommends to launch a structured initiative to<br />
identify exploitable demand by public and private security end-users and to entice non-security SMEs into these niche<br />
markets and, to a lesser degree, to encourage existing security SMEs to diversify. It is noted that for SMEs the large enterprises<br />
are legitimate end-users.<br />
9.3.2 Capitalisation of Europe’s knowledge base<br />
In order to strengthen and dynamically integrate R&D resources and competences to make optimal use of its knowledge base,<br />
Europe would need:<br />
Mapping of technological and industrial competences,<br />
Innovation ecosystem,<br />
Exploiting the value of instruments such as technology platforms or joint initiatives for security,<br />
Education and scenario-based training.<br />
6 http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/entrepreneurship/docs/sme_pack_en_2008_full.pdf<br />
<strong>ESRIF</strong> FINAL REPORT - PART 2 • Working Group: Innovation Issues