I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
54<br />
WARNING SYSTEMS AND<br />
NEW INTERVENTIONS<br />
CONCERNING TERRORIST<br />
ACTS BY ORGANISED<br />
GROUPS AND<br />
NETWORKS<br />
PREVENTION AND<br />
SUPPRESSION OF<br />
ORGANISED CRIMINAL<br />
ACTIVITIES<br />
PREVENTION OF<br />
RADICALISATION BY<br />
CAPACITY BUILDING<br />
CREATION OF CROSS-<br />
CULTURAL, CROSS-<br />
GENERATIONAL, CROSS-<br />
SOCIETAL LINKS<br />
SYSTEMIC NEEDS<br />
Development and verifi cation of models for social dynamics of groups with high levels of<br />
dissatisfaction. Stabilizing and destabilizing triggers have to be traced. Special attention<br />
to the direct and indirect signals of unsatisfi ed groups to the society in several stages<br />
of a radicalisation process could create the basis for new early warning systems and<br />
interventions.<br />
Development of models for the social processes contributing to the originating of personal<br />
criminal intentions and alignment with other persons with criminal intentions. Special<br />
attention to the direct and indirect signals of growing criminal intentions could create the<br />
basis for new early warning options and proper interventions.<br />
To acknowledge the divisions of society and the discrimination which some groups face<br />
on a daily basis – and to develop, or eff ectively apply existing, anti-discriminatory laws and<br />
measures.<br />
To develop, implement and support positive education, employment, careers, housing,<br />
family measures towards fi rst-, second-, third-generation, etc. immigrants without provoking<br />
extremism in the rest of society (See Working Group 11 report on radicalisation)<br />
Analysis of mechanisms with respect to solidarities between citizens from various parts<br />
of town and of society, and making social and societal barriers more porous. This analysis<br />
should result in a methodology for the development of practical measures, e.g. concerning<br />
the integration of newcomers by presentation of the local cultural values and activities<br />
allowing all members of society to participate.<br />
LEGISLATION Thorough assessments for development of <strong>European</strong> law enforcement strategies.<br />
A COMMON EUROPEAN<br />
STRUCTURE FOR<br />
COOPERATION BETWEEN<br />
ACTORS INVOLVED IN<br />
URBAN SECURITY<br />
A common, adaptive, general, legal, conceptual, practical <strong>European</strong> framework should<br />
be developed to insure eff ective, cost-effi cient, integrated, coordinated and synergetic<br />
horizontal (across public agencies, private services and civil organizations) and vertical<br />
(between various levels of government, from local to regional, through national and<br />
<strong>European</strong>) cooperation of all actors in Urban Security, including the inhabitants and<br />
those that are part of the “problems” – fostering dialogue, mutual understanding, close<br />
cooperation and recognition.<br />
The following elements of this framework should be developed:<br />
A cartography of national and <strong>European</strong> Urban Security Risk zones and a <strong>European</strong><br />
network of Local Urban Security Observatories<br />
Methods for monitoring of the subjective feelings of citizens in residential areas<br />
Models describing the dependency of urban security from a spectrum of parameters<br />
(e.g. population characteristics, local distribution of welfare, concentration of unoccupied<br />
houses, presence of shops, levels of illumination, intensity of surveillance by authorities,<br />
organized public panels for surveillance, special instructions and education for citizens<br />
concerning security)<br />
An architecture for supporting the development of security policy by specifi c authorities<br />
with optimal involvement of societal stakeholders (including citizens). This architecture<br />
should make available information systems, models, simulation features and approaches<br />
applied elsewhere<br />
Facilities for Concept Development and Experimentation for supporting the participation<br />
of stakeholders in the design of solutions for specifi c challenges<br />
<strong>ESRIF</strong> FINAL REPORT - PART 2 • Working Group: Security of Citizens