23.10.2013 Views

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54<br />

WARNING SYSTEMS AND<br />

NEW INTERVENTIONS<br />

CONCERNING TERRORIST<br />

ACTS BY ORGANISED<br />

GROUPS AND<br />

NETWORKS<br />

PREVENTION AND<br />

SUPPRESSION OF<br />

ORGANISED CRIMINAL<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

PREVENTION OF<br />

RADICALISATION BY<br />

CAPACITY BUILDING<br />

CREATION OF CROSS-<br />

CULTURAL, CROSS-<br />

GENERATIONAL, CROSS-<br />

SOCIETAL LINKS<br />

SYSTEMIC NEEDS<br />

Development and verifi cation of models for social dynamics of groups with high levels of<br />

dissatisfaction. Stabilizing and destabilizing triggers have to be traced. Special attention<br />

to the direct and indirect signals of unsatisfi ed groups to the society in several stages<br />

of a radicalisation process could create the basis for new early warning systems and<br />

interventions.<br />

Development of models for the social processes contributing to the originating of personal<br />

criminal intentions and alignment with other persons with criminal intentions. Special<br />

attention to the direct and indirect signals of growing criminal intentions could create the<br />

basis for new early warning options and proper interventions.<br />

To acknowledge the divisions of society and the discrimination which some groups face<br />

on a daily basis – and to develop, or eff ectively apply existing, anti-discriminatory laws and<br />

measures.<br />

To develop, implement and support positive education, employment, careers, housing,<br />

family measures towards fi rst-, second-, third-generation, etc. immigrants without provoking<br />

extremism in the rest of society (See Working Group 11 report on radicalisation)<br />

Analysis of mechanisms with respect to solidarities between citizens from various parts<br />

of town and of society, and making social and societal barriers more porous. This analysis<br />

should result in a methodology for the development of practical measures, e.g. concerning<br />

the integration of newcomers by presentation of the local cultural values and activities<br />

allowing all members of society to participate.<br />

LEGISLATION Thorough assessments for development of <strong>European</strong> law enforcement strategies.<br />

A COMMON EUROPEAN<br />

STRUCTURE FOR<br />

COOPERATION BETWEEN<br />

ACTORS INVOLVED IN<br />

URBAN SECURITY<br />

A common, adaptive, general, legal, conceptual, practical <strong>European</strong> framework should<br />

be developed to insure eff ective, cost-effi cient, integrated, coordinated and synergetic<br />

horizontal (across public agencies, private services and civil organizations) and vertical<br />

(between various levels of government, from local to regional, through national and<br />

<strong>European</strong>) cooperation of all actors in Urban Security, including the inhabitants and<br />

those that are part of the “problems” – fostering dialogue, mutual understanding, close<br />

cooperation and recognition.<br />

The following elements of this framework should be developed:<br />

A cartography of national and <strong>European</strong> Urban Security Risk zones and a <strong>European</strong><br />

network of Local Urban Security Observatories<br />

Methods for monitoring of the subjective feelings of citizens in residential areas<br />

Models describing the dependency of urban security from a spectrum of parameters<br />

(e.g. population characteristics, local distribution of welfare, concentration of unoccupied<br />

houses, presence of shops, levels of illumination, intensity of surveillance by authorities,<br />

organized public panels for surveillance, special instructions and education for citizens<br />

concerning security)<br />

An architecture for supporting the development of security policy by specifi c authorities<br />

with optimal involvement of societal stakeholders (including citizens). This architecture<br />

should make available information systems, models, simulation features and approaches<br />

applied elsewhere<br />

Facilities for Concept Development and Experimentation for supporting the participation<br />

of stakeholders in the design of solutions for specifi c challenges<br />

<strong>ESRIF</strong> FINAL REPORT - PART 2 • Working Group: Security of Citizens

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!