23.10.2013 Views

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The chosen system should be adaptable and could be composed of different types of remote surveillance equipment<br />

such as fixed unattended ground sensors, or sensors placed on unmanned platforms (ground or aerial). Certain<br />

components could operate, at least partially, autonomously. Furthermore, extreme weather conditions would have<br />

to be taken into account.<br />

Secure communication systems should be able to exchange all types of information (voice, data and video) at a rate that is<br />

compatible with the urgency of the diff erent situations faced. Furthermore, tools for decision support should be available to<br />

Border Guards, integrating criminal intelligence (lessons learned) gathered by all stakeholders.<br />

Surveillance of Maritime External Borders<br />

The main overall challenges to ensuring interoperability and information sharing in the maritime domain are:<br />

Coordination and integration of diff erent national authorities involved in maritime (border) surveillance at national and EU level<br />

Cooperation with neighbouring third countries<br />

These two overarching challenges require capabilities and standards to be developed on a technical level as well as on tactical,<br />

operational and strategic levels.<br />

More specifi cally, interoperability for maritime border surveillance requires specifi c capabilities for each of the following (in<br />

order of importance):<br />

Communications<br />

Common situational picture<br />

Information management (protocols)<br />

Operational processes<br />

Currently, there are a series of shortfalls with regard to the security in the maritime domain:<br />

Open sea: partial coverage, no continuous and persistent surveillance<br />

Coastal waters: gaps in small targets detection<br />

Member State costal surveillance systems: adjacent, non integrated, limited coordination and information sharing<br />

Legal frameworks: limitation on interventions<br />

Fragmentation of involved organisations<br />

Limited interoperability between sectoral stakeholders and systems<br />

No common situational picture<br />

Lack of early warning and documented alarms<br />

Lack of cooperation with neighbouring third countries<br />

Delays in search and rescue operations (SAR)<br />

These shortcomings result in:<br />

Loss of human life related to traffi cking in human beings and illegal migration activities by sea<br />

Unlawful and criminal activities, organised crime at sea<br />

Limited global cost-eff ectiveness<br />

The current capabilities concerning maritime interoperability and information-sharing present the following gaps:<br />

Communications<br />

• Limited interoperability inside and between countries, not because of lack of communication channels, but mainly<br />

because (1) no data exchange practices are performed between actors and (2) concerns about information ownership<br />

• In many Member States, the absence of a single “National Coordination Centre for Border Control/Surveillance” hampers<br />

interconnecting the diff erent national authorities<br />

Common situational pictures and dissemination tools<br />

• Operational situational pictures fusing all available and relevant information are not produced in real time<br />

• Multi-sensor fusion is limited though various sensor solutions are implemented (including space-based sensors)<br />

• Multi information sources fusion (data bases, intelligence etc.) within the already existing situational picture is limited<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!