I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Weight / Cost<br />
Estimate (small2-<br />
5€; med 10-25€;<br />
large 30-40€)<br />
Cluster Timeline<br />
(short-midlong-term)<br />
From WG What? Why? How? Key link<br />
elements<br />
running<br />
No.<br />
short term<br />
and ongoing<br />
3.2; 3.3; 3.7.2;<br />
3.7.3; 3.11; 3.12; N/A<br />
Before implementing an R&T plan it is necessary to<br />
develop an R&T strategy based on:1) needs defined by<br />
the public and private end users in that case of “policy<br />
driven” research 2) a shared global vision 3) capabilities<br />
priorities.This can be done by a work to define and<br />
prioritize “capabilities” in a capability development plan.<br />
The aims of such a work are :A) to make the global vision<br />
more specific and thus more useful;B) to identify<br />
priorities for capability development; C) to bring out<br />
opportunities to pool and cooperate.The CDP can (and<br />
should) be used as an important tool to guide R&T<br />
investments, but the CDP is not a work addressing only<br />
R&T: I) the CDP focuses on needs for capability<br />
improvement in security task terms, and not in<br />
technologies or R&T tasks II)the CDP does not focus<br />
exclusively on equipments or R&T: the outputs can be<br />
global technological needs for a better efficiency but also<br />
a better organization, a better use of existing resources<br />
etc.Not everything that is proposed by the CDP<br />
necessarily has an R&T component.<br />
Members States employ different approaches<br />
for the management of the Security Research<br />
Plans ranging from the establishment of<br />
dedicated National Authorities to the<br />
extension of the role of existing structures.<br />
The variety of implementation approaches<br />
represents an issue for <strong>ESRIF</strong>,<br />
84 10 Compatibility of security<br />
capabilities among MS<br />
At the end the capability development plan must be get<br />
a political approval at the right level. For us the<br />
designated lisbon treaty High Rep / EC Vice Pdt is the<br />
good person for an approval. The capability development<br />
plan must be a continuous task to implement each year,<br />
due to the evolution of threats, of technologies etc. After<br />
a starting work, for one or 2 years, creating an initial CDP,<br />
an annual upgrading has to be done. We have to define a<br />
permanent network / structure with 2 geometries: one<br />
for the initial work, another to annually upgrade the<br />
CDP…Due to its importance (in particular the definition<br />
of R&T priorities), this capability development plan can be<br />
prepared by an “Independent adequate Structure”<br />
populated by experts from MS, Agencies/Institutions<br />
dealing with operational issues, through a constructive<br />
dialog between that structure and the “research world”<br />
(public laboratories and industry)<br />
279