23.10.2013 Views

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Weight / Cost<br />

Estimate (small2-<br />

5€; med 10-25€;<br />

large 30-40€)<br />

Cluster Timeline<br />

(short-midlong-term)<br />

From WG What? Why? How? Key link<br />

elements<br />

running<br />

No.<br />

short term<br />

and ongoing<br />

3.2; 3.3; 3.7.2;<br />

3.7.3; 3.11; 3.12; N/A<br />

Before implementing an R&T plan it is necessary to<br />

develop an R&T strategy based on:1) needs defined by<br />

the public and private end users in that case of “policy<br />

driven” research 2) a shared global vision 3) capabilities<br />

priorities.This can be done by a work to define and<br />

prioritize “capabilities” in a capability development plan.<br />

The aims of such a work are :A) to make the global vision<br />

more specific and thus more useful;B) to identify<br />

priorities for capability development; C) to bring out<br />

opportunities to pool and cooperate.The CDP can (and<br />

should) be used as an important tool to guide R&T<br />

investments, but the CDP is not a work addressing only<br />

R&T: I) the CDP focuses on needs for capability<br />

improvement in security task terms, and not in<br />

technologies or R&T tasks II)the CDP does not focus<br />

exclusively on equipments or R&T: the outputs can be<br />

global technological needs for a better efficiency but also<br />

a better organization, a better use of existing resources<br />

etc.Not everything that is proposed by the CDP<br />

necessarily has an R&T component.<br />

Members States employ different approaches<br />

for the management of the Security Research<br />

Plans ranging from the establishment of<br />

dedicated National Authorities to the<br />

extension of the role of existing structures.<br />

The variety of implementation approaches<br />

represents an issue for <strong>ESRIF</strong>,<br />

84 10 Compatibility of security<br />

capabilities among MS<br />

At the end the capability development plan must be get<br />

a political approval at the right level. For us the<br />

designated lisbon treaty High Rep / EC Vice Pdt is the<br />

good person for an approval. The capability development<br />

plan must be a continuous task to implement each year,<br />

due to the evolution of threats, of technologies etc. After<br />

a starting work, for one or 2 years, creating an initial CDP,<br />

an annual upgrading has to be done. We have to define a<br />

permanent network / structure with 2 geometries: one<br />

for the initial work, another to annually upgrade the<br />

CDP…Due to its importance (in particular the definition<br />

of R&T priorities), this capability development plan can be<br />

prepared by an “Independent adequate Structure”<br />

populated by experts from MS, Agencies/Institutions<br />

dealing with operational issues, through a constructive<br />

dialog between that structure and the “research world”<br />

(public laboratories and industry)<br />

279

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!