I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

276
Weight / Cost
Estimate (small2-
5€; med 10-25€;
large 30-40€)
Cluster Timeline
(short-midlong-term)
From WG What? Why? How? Key link
elements
running
No.
small
short to mid
term
4
§ 3.1, 3.10, 4.1.1,
4.2.4 & reco. 5
part 1 ; § 3.3.3 &
4.2.1.part 2
(WG8) final
report
• Need of a single system governing all the international
movements of assets.
• Development of Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PET)
solutions.
• Biometric solutions to effectively improve the privacy of
individuals.
• Mechanisms allowing revocation of biometric
information.
Security solutions that are put in place must
provide an efficient protection of the privacy of
the individuals. The Data Protection Directive
provides a common framework for the EU-27.
MS have to take proper actions
correspondingly. Specific technological
75 8 Harmonised privacy
protection for identity
management
solutions, such as PET, have to be developed.
med to large
short to mid
term
4
§ 2.3, 2.4, 3.9,
4.1.3 & 4.2.3 part
1 ; § 4.2.5. part2
(WG8) final
report
• Automated border control to leverage the increasing
number of electronic travel documents and to manage
the associated technical and legal complexity.
Harmonised global border
control
76 8
ESRIF FINAL REPORT - ANNEX II
• Move the border controls from reactive to proactive
through a connection to a secure information system
(through companies operating flights or through a
special secure connection); passengers checked by
authorities during the flight; only those who need a more
detailed control at the border will be actually and
physically checked
• Need to manage the threat posed by the regulated
workers and populations such as the police, the x-ray
screeners in airports.
• Develop standards required to ensure true
interoperability of secure documents and systems.
Lack of Change Management and planning.
Failure to plan and build efficiency into
systems such that individuals can be fast
tracked will result in major user satisfaction
and management issues.
Lack of business models to manage costs of
new security systems.
Lack of system interoperability. Hence new
systems are limited and will ultimately not be
fit for the sophisticated purposes for which
they are required.
Standards – failure to agree and put in place all
required standards continues to hold up our
ability to exploit and maximise our use of
available and new technologies. Also it hinders
innovation and R&D as developers still do not
have roadmaps for all requirements as yet.
• Architecture - Require architectural support and clear
interface specification including data formatting and
security for the new systems and use central
infrastructures for multiple applications –removing
redundant and/or isolated “stovepipe” systems
• Support best of breed technologies,
• Efficiency versus accuracy trade-off