I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

46 “Missions” and thematic areas : 1. Security of the citizens 2. Security of critical infrastructures 3. Border security 4. Crisis management 5. Foresight and scenarios 6. CBRN 7. Situation awareness and the role of space 8. Identifi cation of people and assets Horizontal (cross-cutting) issues : 9. Innovation issues 10. Governance and coordination 11. Human and societal dynamics of security Co-ordinating with each other, the WGs’ work was simultaneous. Each group had a leader and a rapporteur to guide the process. Methodology ESRIF’s work approach and roadmap can be summarised as follows: The fi rst year was dedicated to assessing existing security policy decisions, strategies and plans at European and national level, as well as recent studies and projects such as those of PASR, FP6 and FP7. Exploiting its experts’ knowledge base, ESRIF identifi ed the mid-term threats and risks for Europe’s security and the resulting challenges. During the second year the required capabilities and capability gaps in European security policy needed to counter the above threats were identifi ed. Finally, a set of comprehensive recommendations for research and policy measures in the innovation domain were drawn up indicating priority areas. Not only did ESRIF draw on the work of the GoP and ESRAB, but also on contributions from other fora to avoid duplication of eff orts and to maximise consistency with the results of previous and ongoing research programmes. In order to explicitly account for long term developments ESRIF engaged in a scenario planning exercise where a set of alternative future worlds were developed to contextualise the midterm fi ndings on threats, risks and challenges identifi ed by ESRIF Working Groups. This “robustness check” demonstrated a tendency for societal risk to grow over time, which underscores the need for security innovation to avoid excessive costs. The ESRIA road map In Part I of the fi nal report the ESRIA roadmap was visualised. The foundation of ESRIA is based on the table described below (and attached in annex II). A common framework guided the construction of the roadmap, based on the answers to the critical «why-what-how-when» questions that defi ne and explain the research plan, including in some cases the investment indication. The following information is inserted into the Road Map table on each item: 1. Running number 2. WG number 1. WHAT? Research capability 2. WHY? Reasoning 3. HOW? Plot of the future development in scientifi c or technical fi eld 4. Key link elements (Reference to Part I Paragraph where the research need is mentioned) 5. WHEN? Timeline (short -20019/13; mid- 2013/2020; long-term beyond 2020) 6. Weight/Cost estimation (only on a voluntary basis) 7. Cluster number The working groups aligned themselves with the fi ve clusters (decribed in chapter 3 of Part I), according to a structure based ESRIF FINAL REPORT - PART 2 • Introduction
on research capabilities and technological needs. The WHY defi nes the domain of the roadmap, which is based on the ESRIF vision and key messages, the end users needs and Europe’s competitive positions. The roadmap connects and balances the drivers of research capabilities (WHAT - end-users pull) and technology innovation (HOW - technology push). Due to the huge number of research capabilities (WHAT) generated by the WGs (95) and the extent to which they varied in terms of granularity, a virtual reference for grouping the capabilities was established, called function. This is an artificial expedient to help the readability of the roadmap in the visualisation that does not form part of the Roadmap table. The function arranges capabilities that are associated to similar technological or scientifi c solutions. There are approximately 350 scientifi c and technological lines (HOW). Moreover in the visualisation (Part I) a technology readiness level (TRL) was associated to all of them to assess the maturity of each specifi c technology and the evolution of technologies that will achieve the objectives over time is also shown. The time-based (WHEN) Roadmap shows the urgency of the research capability. ESRIA roadmaps and table also include linkages to show how the elements of the roadmap are driven by systemic or innovation needs. Contributions by the eleven Working Groups In the following 11 chapters, each Working Group explains in more details its work and fi ndings. While using the earlier described methodology, the working groups have - in as far as possible - divided their respective chapters into the following sections: Introduction Threats, risks and challenges (or “Challenges” for non-mission groups) Capabilities and gaps (or “Needs” for non-mission groups) Priorities (for research and innovation) Conclusion List of references and annexes to the chapters are found in Annex 3. Relevant reference and background materials are included in the attached CD-ROM. 47
Page 1 and 2: ESRIF FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2009
Page 3: Foreword Dragutin Mate, Chairman of
Page 6: 6 5. Working Group: Foresight and S
Page 11 and 12: 1. Introduction 1.1 ESRIF’s tasks
Page 13 and 14: 2. ESRIF’S Vision: Key Messages T
Page 15 and 16: Indeed, certain problems such as ne
Page 17: New capability driven, standardisat
Page 20 and 21: 20 SECURITY CYCLE; PREVENTING, PROT
Page 22 and 23: 22 Understanding the situation is a
Page 24 and 25: 24 3.5 Explosives Explosives are un
Page 26 and 27: 26 CAPABILITIES FUNCTION MISSION FU
Page 28 and 29: 28 ESRIF is acutely aware that as a
Page 30 and 31: 30 SECURING IDENTITY, ACCESS AND MO
Page 32 and 33: 32 SYSTEMIC NEEDS RESEARCH NEEDS CR
Page 34 and 35: 34 3.14 Evidence and forensics Due
Page 36 and 37: 36 Ultimately, EU-wide governance i
Page 38 and 39: 38 discordant legislation aff ects
Page 40: 40 Preparations to meet foreseeabl
Page 45: Introduction Introduction Part II o
Page 49 and 50: 1. Working Group: Security of the C
Page 51 and 52: • Security service providers. In
Page 53 and 54: 1.2.1.4 Research needs Research is
Page 55 and 56: CIVIL RIGHTS To enhance privacy, sp
Page 57 and 58: co-operation on a national and inte
Page 59 and 60: SYSTEMIC NEEDS LEGAL BASIS FOR THE
Page 61 and 62: During the post-disaster phase, aft
Page 63 and 64: 2. Investigation with respect to cr
Page 65 and 66: COUNTERACTING EXPLOSIVES SYSTEMIC N
Page 67 and 68: • Law enforcement and intelligenc
Page 69 and 70: 2. Working Group: Security of Criti
Page 71 and 72: Weaknesses inherent to existing sys
Page 73 and 74: data - will need to be secured, req
Page 75 and 76: embarkation points will be importan
Page 77 and 78: the rapid on-lining of powered-down
Page 79 and 80: Research Needs: Information and Com
Page 81 and 82: STOCKTAKING Research into security
Page 83 and 84: 2.5 Point of Focus: New Critical In
Page 85 and 86: enhanced research eff orts need to
Page 87 and 88: 2.6.6 Intervention The evolution o
Page 89 and 90: 3. Working Group: Border Security 3
Page 91 and 92: The above mentioned tools could be
Page 93 and 94: The chosen system should be adaptab
Page 95 and 96: In general, interoperability will r
Page 97 and 98:
• Guaranteed data networks with a
Page 99 and 100:
• Combination of assets (coastal,
Page 101 and 102:
4. Working Group: Crisis Management
Page 103 and 104:
4.1.2 Work organisation In order to
Page 105 and 106:
CROWD MANAGEMENT AND EVACUATION SEA
Page 107 and 108:
SITUATIONAL AWARENESS They are coup
Page 109 and 110:
ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION AND DEC
Page 111 and 112:
might be low due to the overall opt
Page 113 and 114:
4 STRATEGY AND TACTICAL SIMULATION
Page 115 and 116:
11 RECOVERY LOGISTICS Complex crise
Page 117 and 118:
ESRIF KEY MESSAGES CONTRIBUTION OF
Page 119 and 120:
5. Working Group: Foresight and Sce
Page 121 and 122:
foresight can enhance fl exibility
Page 123 and 124:
the like. The underlying diff erenc
Page 125 and 126:
Demography Science and Technology M
Page 127 and 128:
5.4.3 Identifi cation and prioritis
Page 129 and 130:
Global economy (including eff ects
Page 131 and 132:
adapting security to the spectrum o
Page 133 and 134:
Enhancing creative capabilities in
Page 135 and 136:
Handling high-quality societal fore
Page 137 and 138:
6. Working Group: CBRN 6.1 Introduc
Page 139 and 140:
includes threat assessment, prevent
Page 141 and 142:
medical counter-measures, decontami
Page 143 and 144:
simplify the dissolution of radioac
Page 145 and 146:
Identifi ed capability gaps are the
Page 147 and 148:
having clear Standard Operating Pro
Page 149 and 150:
Even the people themselves are key
Page 151 and 152:
Extended strain collections with a
Page 153 and 154:
of chemical, mechanical, civil, env
Page 155 and 156:
7. Working Group: Situation Awarene
Page 157 and 158:
Nonetheless, to protect information
Page 159 and 160:
7.2.1.2 Communications A key aspect
Page 161 and 162:
7.2.2 Required capabilities Securit
Page 163 and 164:
Legal frameworks have to be created
Page 165 and 166:
OPTIMIZED COMMUNICATION CAPABILITIE
Page 167 and 168:
all around the globe near real-time
Page 169 and 170:
A variety of diff erent platforms a
Page 171 and 172:
8. Working Group: Identifi cation o
Page 173 and 174:
In 1997, the very fi rst secure ele
Page 175 and 176:
Tuning of biometric systems The dec
Page 177 and 178:
At border of destination country: t
Page 179 and 180:
2. Supply chain risks: The terroris
Page 181 and 182:
Being more fi t for purpose - some
Page 183 and 184:
A Certifi cate Policy (CP) is put i
Page 185 and 186:
8.3.1.3 New practices and technolog
Page 187 and 188:
The Electronic System for Travel Au
Page 189 and 190:
8.3.3.3 Privacy protection Need to
Page 191 and 192:
Mobile ID devices may be used for a
Page 193 and 194:
The key points we would like to rei
Page 195 and 196:
9. Working Group: Innovation Issues
Page 197 and 198:
ESRIF WG 9 set the objective to eng
Page 199 and 200:
Not only this interaction between d
Page 201 and 202:
Role of Public Procurement The Euro
Page 203 and 204:
9.3.2.1 European Security Technolog
Page 205 and 206:
for training and education for secu
Page 207 and 208:
10. Working Group: Governance and C
Page 209 and 210:
10.2.1.4 Research Governance and Ma
Page 211 and 212:
locus of governance is the first-re
Page 213 and 214:
10.3 Findings & Gaps This section p
Page 215 and 216:
which members of a society orient t
Page 217 and 218:
The second noticeable result theref
Page 219 and 220:
in thematic thrust (such as society
Page 221 and 222:
For the moment, improving synergies
Page 223 and 224:
Concepts Concepts are drawn in CSCP
Page 225 and 226:
Annual workshops, ideas boxes can b
Page 227 and 228:
In the above fi gure it can be seen
Page 229 and 230:
11. Working Group: Human and Societ
Page 231 and 232:
Good governance is refl ected throu
Page 233 and 234:
together - into enduring working le
Page 235 and 236:
6. Another research area focuses on
Page 237 and 238:
4. Best Practices in Community-Base
Page 239 and 240:
3. Terrorism and counter-terrorist
Page 241 and 242:
11.2.5.2 Themes for future research
Page 243 and 244:
excellence alone. Such systems are
Page 245 and 246:
ESRIF FINAL REPORT ANNEXES
Page 247 and 248:
ANNEX I Terms of Reference (ToR) fo
Page 249 and 250:
6. Confidentiality ESRIF members, r
Page 251 and 252:
251
Page 253 and 254:
ANNEX II Roadmap table Weight / Cos
Page 255 and 256:
Weight / Cost Estimate (small2- 5
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
ANNEX III List of ESRIF Members (No
Page 285 and 286:
PRANJÍC Stipan (Croatia) Ministry
Page 287 and 288:
Leader: UNGER Christoph Rapporteur:
Page 289 and 290:
FERNANDEZ VASQUEZ Diego FERRARI Mar
Page 291 and 292:
STAICU Marcel STELTE Norbert STENER
Page 293 and 294:
ANNEX IV Working Group References a
Page 295 and 296:
United States, Department of Homela
Page 297 and 298:
DORIZZI Bernadette, GARCIA-MATEO Ca
Page 299 and 300:
MORDINI Emilio, OTTOLINI Corinna, B
Page 301 and 302:
Working Group 9: Innovation Issues
Page 303 and 304:
Culture as a factor in the percepti
Page 305 and 306:
DE - security culture as such has b
Page 307 and 308:
AT AT AT AT + Domestic security (re
Page 309 and 310:
- Security is seen as a national sy
Page 311 and 312:
AT AT AT AT FR FR - Ministry of Tra
Page 313 and 314:
Matrix 2: Overall assessment of evi
Page 315 and 316:
Matrix 4: Cultural factor summarize
Page 317 and 318:
Austria France Germany Italy Nether
Page 319 and 320:
UAVs UAVs UAVs UAVs Links space - U
Page 321 and 322:
IT Initial Tranche JLS Justice, Lib
Page 323:
European Integration: The Dynamics
show all

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?