23.10.2013 Views

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

New capability driven, standardisation concepts must be developed, focusing on the performance of security-related solutions<br />

rather than on the level of technical equipment specifi cations. This security-by-design approach will enrich the market and<br />

allow a broad range of industries to come up with compatible, interoperable and fl exible solutions to meet customer needs.<br />

Incorporating security in new systems, together with safety and environmental integrity, at the earliest stages of the design<br />

process has an ongoing and positive impact. Critical infrastructures and services will need innovative technical solutions and<br />

capabilities, and intense preparation of the operators to minimise the impact of incidents and ensure fast recovery. At nuclear<br />

and airport facilities, for example, high standards of security require that design takes full account of security requirements for<br />

both operational and crisis scenarios right from the start. Security-by-design aff ects other life-cyle aspects too. Legacy systems<br />

may need updating to new security levels. Maintenance and repairs must guarantee safe and secure systems for the public.<br />

Periodic testing is imperative, as is the continuous training of operators.<br />

The security-by-design also directly concerns quality of emergency management, where personnel at all levels must be able<br />

to communicate effi ciently with fi rst responders and society at large. Raising public awareness about security and the nature<br />

of threats, and how to interact with emergency forces during crises are important goals.<br />

The fi rst analytical phase of a security lifecycle is greatly enhanced if detailed standards and guidelines regarding the product’s<br />

applications are immediately available. It is common practice today to conclude the realisation phase (covering detailed design<br />

to manufacture) via verifi cation of performance and design, so that a product can be certifi ed early on. In this regard, some<br />

type of <strong>European</strong> security label could be a useful instrument for promoting a common “seal of quality” for security equipment,<br />

capabilities and solutions.<br />

2.9 Awareness raising through education<br />

and training<br />

Education and scenario-based training contribute signifi cantly to the overall acknowledgement and recognition that<br />

security is a common responsibility of all stakeholders, especially, policymakers, regulators and citizens.<br />

Education and training in the security sector is a common responsibility of all stakeholders: security offi cers, policy makers, law<br />

enforcement agencies, civic society, industry, research organisations, academia and the media.<br />

To achieve resilience, specifi c programmes are needed to reach out to the wider public to raise awareness of threats, risks<br />

and vulnerabilities and to improve its understanding of policies and the technological solutions required for security. Priority<br />

should go to initiatives involving the media and the special role they play in communicating about security crises.<br />

Security training across Europe is diversifi ed and often under the direct control of local authorities or a specifi c public service.<br />

For eff ective interoperability, transnational initiatives in training and education for security functions and tasks should greatly<br />

increase experience and the exchange of best practices. Tying these initiatives to existing networks for professional training<br />

such as CEPOL – the <strong>European</strong> Police Academy – would ensure rapid progress in this important fi eld.<br />

The use of virtual reality, “gaming” and other simulation environments off ers considerable training opportunities in the security<br />

fi eld. Their use would increase informal learning, foster communities of practice and facilitate the translation of operational<br />

lessons learnt into learning environments (and vice versa). Similarly, scenarios would provide realistic contexts and environments<br />

for complex crisis management operations and off er an important means for delivering training solutions in the future.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!