I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
New capability driven, standardisation concepts must be developed, focusing on the performance of security-related solutions<br />
rather than on the level of technical equipment specifi cations. This security-by-design approach will enrich the market and<br />
allow a broad range of industries to come up with compatible, interoperable and fl exible solutions to meet customer needs.<br />
Incorporating security in new systems, together with safety and environmental integrity, at the earliest stages of the design<br />
process has an ongoing and positive impact. Critical infrastructures and services will need innovative technical solutions and<br />
capabilities, and intense preparation of the operators to minimise the impact of incidents and ensure fast recovery. At nuclear<br />
and airport facilities, for example, high standards of security require that design takes full account of security requirements for<br />
both operational and crisis scenarios right from the start. Security-by-design aff ects other life-cyle aspects too. Legacy systems<br />
may need updating to new security levels. Maintenance and repairs must guarantee safe and secure systems for the public.<br />
Periodic testing is imperative, as is the continuous training of operators.<br />
The security-by-design also directly concerns quality of emergency management, where personnel at all levels must be able<br />
to communicate effi ciently with fi rst responders and society at large. Raising public awareness about security and the nature<br />
of threats, and how to interact with emergency forces during crises are important goals.<br />
The fi rst analytical phase of a security lifecycle is greatly enhanced if detailed standards and guidelines regarding the product’s<br />
applications are immediately available. It is common practice today to conclude the realisation phase (covering detailed design<br />
to manufacture) via verifi cation of performance and design, so that a product can be certifi ed early on. In this regard, some<br />
type of <strong>European</strong> security label could be a useful instrument for promoting a common “seal of quality” for security equipment,<br />
capabilities and solutions.<br />
2.9 Awareness raising through education<br />
and training<br />
Education and scenario-based training contribute signifi cantly to the overall acknowledgement and recognition that<br />
security is a common responsibility of all stakeholders, especially, policymakers, regulators and citizens.<br />
Education and training in the security sector is a common responsibility of all stakeholders: security offi cers, policy makers, law<br />
enforcement agencies, civic society, industry, research organisations, academia and the media.<br />
To achieve resilience, specifi c programmes are needed to reach out to the wider public to raise awareness of threats, risks<br />
and vulnerabilities and to improve its understanding of policies and the technological solutions required for security. Priority<br />
should go to initiatives involving the media and the special role they play in communicating about security crises.<br />
Security training across Europe is diversifi ed and often under the direct control of local authorities or a specifi c public service.<br />
For eff ective interoperability, transnational initiatives in training and education for security functions and tasks should greatly<br />
increase experience and the exchange of best practices. Tying these initiatives to existing networks for professional training<br />
such as CEPOL – the <strong>European</strong> Police Academy – would ensure rapid progress in this important fi eld.<br />
The use of virtual reality, “gaming” and other simulation environments off ers considerable training opportunities in the security<br />
fi eld. Their use would increase informal learning, foster communities of practice and facilitate the translation of operational<br />
lessons learnt into learning environments (and vice versa). Similarly, scenarios would provide realistic contexts and environments<br />
for complex crisis management operations and off er an important means for delivering training solutions in the future.<br />
17