I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
I527-290 ESRIF Final Report (WEB).indd - European Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
92<br />
Border Checks<br />
The following classes of capabilities should be properly addressed:<br />
Capabilities to face rising volume of traffi c of people and goods<br />
Capabilities to detect illicit substances and concealed people<br />
Capabilities to identify people and assets<br />
Capabilities to process information, including issues of interoperability and situational awareness<br />
Capabilities to perform threat assessments and profi ling, including information sharing and learning systems<br />
The challenge of facing the rising volume of traffi c of people and goods requires capabilities for:<br />
Higher speeds of detection, identifi cation, information processing and threat assessment of border check processes<br />
Positive profi ling of low-risk frequent travellers<br />
Flexible, upgradeable (mobile) solutions<br />
User-friendly and aff ordable systems<br />
Automation of border control<br />
Incorporating a stand-off capability<br />
Harmonised standards in security and mobility chains (linked to customs control)<br />
Stakeholder management to create a secure supply chain (linked to customs control)<br />
Dealing with increased technical skills among groups that pose threats<br />
The challenge of detecting concealed people and illicit substances requires mainly technological capabilities for achieving:<br />
Higher resolution of images<br />
Better identifi cation of elemental, molecular, or biological composition (in order of increasing complexity) of the material<br />
Higher detection rates with a low false alarm rate and at higher speed (especially nuclear)<br />
Higher rates of detection, identifi cation and defusing of explosive devices<br />
There may be opportunities for improved processes e.g. at seaports (or) using transit time to increase scan time, but there<br />
are still a number of organisational and legal barriers to gain agreement on such processes with multiple seaports, countries,<br />
stakeholders etc.<br />
The challenge of identifying people and assets requires:<br />
Means to assess the validity of travel documents<br />
Means to identify overstayers<br />
Methods and technologies to detect spoofi ng of biometric features. This holds especially for fi ngerprints.<br />
Standardisation and certifi cation of equipment<br />
Mobile devices and high-speed wireless connections for ID checking (including biometrics) in buses, trains, etc.<br />
Surveillance of External Land Borders<br />
A permanent surveillance of all parts of the external land border is neither needed nor politically desirable. Border surveillance<br />
should thus be based on risk analysis and intelligence. This means that the focus for the surveillance of the external land<br />
borders is on border patrols using mobile equipment, while only selected parts of the land border should be surveyed by<br />
stationary systems.<br />
There is currently a multitude of technical solutions for land border surveillance. However, the practical use of these<br />
systems is hampered by cost, reliability and interoperability. One of the main challenges identified is that the systems<br />
currently available are far too expensive. Furthermore, affordability and interoperability will therefore be key issues when<br />
developing the requirements for the necessary equipment, systems, doctrines, processes and standards to enhance land<br />
border security systems.<br />
Such systems will have to work on a 24/7 basis and must be able, with a low false alarm rate, to send an early warning to<br />
command systems. Furthermore those systems will have to be easy to use for Border Guards with support & services adapted<br />
to the end-user requirements.<br />
<strong>ESRIF</strong> FINAL REPORT - PART 2 • Working Group: Border Security