cheenc03a.pdf
cheenc03a.pdf
cheenc03a.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ROMANS (EPISTLE)<br />
and benediction (1,-1). an introduction (18-xi), and a<br />
statement of what he regards ar the essential matter as<br />
regards the preaching of the gospel-a thing not to be<br />
ashamed of but to k everywhere preached as a power<br />
of God for the salvation of every believer whether Jew<br />
or Grrek (1r6J)-come two great doctrinal sections<br />
followed by an ethical section. The first doctrinal<br />
section, 11e-839, is devoted to the elucidation of the truth<br />
that the gospel in the means for the salvation of Jews<br />
and Greeks, because in it is revealed the righteousness<br />
of God from faith to faith ; the other. 9-11. to an earnest<br />
di~clls~ion of what seems to be a comolete reiection of<br />
the Jews by God: the third, the ethical section (121-<br />
15~~). to a setting forth of the conduct that befits the<br />
Christian both towards God and towards man in - eenera1.<br />
and towards the weak and their claims in uartlcular<br />
In substance the doctrine is aa follows. Sin has<br />
alienated all men. Jews and Gentiles alike, from God,<br />
50 that neither our natural knowledze of God nor the<br />
law is able to help us (118.3~0). An& way of salvation<br />
is opened up, a God's rightmurnerr has been manifested'<br />
(6r~atoolvq ReoD rr@avipwrar) for all men without distinction,<br />
by faith in relation to Jerus Christ (311-31). It<br />
is accordingly of no importance to be descended from<br />
Abraham according to the flesh : Abraham in the higher<br />
sense is the father of thore who believe (4). Justified by<br />
faith. we have peace with God and the best hopes for<br />
the future (5). Let no one, however, suppose that the<br />
doctrine of grace, the persuasion that we are under<br />
grace, not under the law, will conduce to sin or bring<br />
the law into contempt. Such conclusions can and<br />
must be peremptorily set aside (6-7). The emancipated<br />
life of the Christian, free from the law of sin and death,<br />
in a gloiiou one (8). Israel. the ancient people of the<br />
promises with its great privileges, appears indeed to be<br />
rejected, yet will finally be gathered in (9.11). The life<br />
of Christians, in relation to God and man, must in every<br />
respect give evidence of complete renewal and absolute<br />
consecration (12r~15~3). Finally, a closing word as to<br />
the aportle'r vocation which he hopes to fulfil in Rome<br />
also : a commendation of Phebe, greetings, exhortations,<br />
benedictions, and an ascription of praise to God<br />
(151s16zr).<br />
If, at a first inspection, the work presents itself to us<br />
as an epistle written by Paul to the Christians at Rome.<br />
B, D&CUlties: on cl"ser examination it becomes diffinot<br />
a letter; cult to adhere to such a view. Dimopen<br />
and cuities arise on every side. To begin<br />
w~th-as regards the form that is<br />
c,oae,<br />
assumed. We are acauainted with no<br />
letters of antiquity with any ruch exordium as this :<br />
' Paul, bond-slave of Jesus Christ, "ailed an apostle,<br />
reparated unto the gospel of God . . . to all thore<br />
who are in Rome . . . grace to you and peace from<br />
God our father and the Lord Jesus Chrirt' (IloDhor<br />
6oCAor 'IqooD Xp~oroS, xhni6r drbnohor d+opc#&vor 66rh@bv eou, 1410). 'For if because of meat thy brother<br />
elr skyyihlov BroG . . . r8aw ?air oOmu iu 'Phpg is grieved, etc.' (el yrtp Lb j3pirpo b dBrh@br ~ o hvrrira' v<br />
. . . xdpcr BpG xnal rlprjvq dr6 BroG --orpar +pOv x.1 n.r.A., 14 x ~), etc. Often the argument proceeds uninxupio"<br />
'IqroO Xp~aroQ) ; nor with any conclusion so terruptedly for a long time withottt any indication of the<br />
high-sounding as the doxology of 10os-z7, or the prayer existence of a defrnite circle of persons to whom it is<br />
for the grace of our Lord Jesus Chrirt which is heard in addressed. Yet, on the other hand also, the abstract<br />
16- (or 16~~). In every other case the epistles of argumentation gives place to direct address, the word<br />
antiquity invariably begin plainly and simply.<br />
of admonition or exhortation spoken to the brethren<br />
Thus, for example in the collection of Oxyrhynchus papri (darA@l), whether named or unnamed-the mention of<br />
(118,) we hrve ~i?$v; Tao"v'+pt' rdr mibur rj$",?d" . . . and<br />
at the clorc .f =pa .; or (1 zs3 Xalp#oc<br />
whom, however, when it occurs, is a purely oratorical<br />
Arouurcur 72. rupivr<br />
&n+; X.;p. md, at the close, ipp~d~i<br />
nr ~ x ~ ~ ~ c form . and no natural expression of the existence of any<br />
Greetings are indeed conveyed both from and to ruecia1 relation between the writer and his assumed<br />
various persons : but never are w many introduced as readers. Of the passages coming within the %ope of<br />
in Rom. 163.16. where in fact at the end oN the churches thisremark (some of them, already noticed in 8 q), none<br />
salute. A letter-writer may, at the outre:, reek to bring uresents any peculiarity in this respect. On the conhimself<br />
into closerrelationship h.ith his reader or to make ;ray, of thcm producer "niformly the same<br />
himself known more exactly; but in the many ex- impression : in this manner no real letter is ever written.<br />
amples of real letters that have come down to ur from<br />
ancient times we nowhere find anything even approach-<br />
The last chapter has nothing of the character of a<br />
portscript to a letter already completed, although the<br />
ing the amplitude of Rom. 1~-6. Nor yet does any real letter appears to end with 153-33. Stmnge, in the<br />
letter, whether intended for few or for many, 30 far as srnse of being not natural but artificial, is the appearance<br />
4131<br />
ROMANS (EPISTLE)<br />
we are in a position to judge, ever give us cause, because<br />
by its length or its elaborate method it resembles a<br />
treatise arraneed in orderly sections, to reeard it ar a<br />
,,<br />
. .<br />
parison between our epistle and any real letters from<br />
style of ancient times, so imporrible is it toregard<br />
It a" "actual epistle, to whatever date.<br />
address,<br />
locality, or author we may assian it.<br />
How could any one it the very beginning of a Let&, in<br />
which. . too. . the first desire he writes to rxoress is that<br />
of writing solemnly, earnestly, directly, allow himself<br />
10 expatiate, as this writer does, in ruch a parenthesis?<br />
He speaks as a didactic expounder who, for the most<br />
part, directly and as concisely as possible, deals with a<br />
number of disputed points, with regard to which the<br />
reader may be supposed to be in doubt or uncertainty<br />
h u e in point of fact they have gained acceptance<br />
within certain circles. These expositions relate to<br />
nothing more or less than ruch points as the relation<br />
of the Pauline Goswl to the OT lu. 21, the descent of<br />
the Son of God f;om the house'of bavid (v. ,), the<br />
evidence of the Messiahship of Jesus derived from his<br />
resurrection (0.*), the origin and the legitimacy of the<br />
Pauline preaching (v. s). At the same time the readers<br />
(who have not yet been named and are first addressed in<br />
w. v\ ., are assured that the" belonr - to the Gentiles 188vnl. , .,.<br />
with reference to whom Paul has received hk apostleship.<br />
although, according to 1 rvr3, he has never as yet met<br />
them and consequently has not been the means of their<br />
conversion. All this within a sinale -. ~aienthesir. In<br />
such wire no letter was ever heyn.<br />
Thewtiter addresses himself to 'all' the members of a<br />
wide circle-let us ray in Rome : even if the words 'in<br />
Rome' (#v 'Phpg) a& ,those who are in Rome' (72s<br />
6v'Phpg. 171~). according to some MS authorities. do<br />
not belong to the original text, their meaning is assured<br />
by the superscription 'to Romans' (rp6r'Pwpaiour : cp<br />
151%-r9) and by the unvarying tradition as to the dertination<br />
of the 'eoistle.' The Paul whom we meet here<br />
addresser his discouse toa wide public, and utters in lofty<br />
toner such words as these: '0, man, whoever thou be<br />
who judgert, etc.' (3 duBp-r r8r 6 rplvwv x.r.h., 21).<br />
(0, man, who judgest, etc.' (3&vBpwrr 6 npivwv n.r.h..<br />
Zs). 'If thou bearest the name of a Jew, etc.' (el 61 o0<br />
'Ioubaior (ravopdh x.r.h., 21~). 'Nay hut, 0 man,<br />
who art thou that repliest against God?' (3 Bu8pwrr.<br />
psvoDvyc #B 71s ei d dvr.roxp'"bpe"or r$ BE$, 9 ~ ~ 'But ) .<br />
I speak to you that are Gentiles' (Bp% Jdi hiyw roir<br />
€Rue~rv, llr3), ' I say . . to every man that is among<br />
you, etc.' (hiyw . . . rovrl 74 6ui~ #v Bpii r.7.h..<br />
'Whoart thou that judgest thescrvant of another?'<br />
(ob rir rT 6 xpivwv dhXdrpcov ainirnu, 14,). 'But thou,<br />
why dost thou judge thy brother?' (ob 61 rl rpive'r ibv