cheenc03a.pdf
cheenc03a.pdf
cheenc03a.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
~~~ ~~~~~~~<br />
SHESHBAZZAR<br />
indeed, ' Jarhu' war supposed to be etymologically akin<br />
to Jerahrneel (as a hypocollrcicon) is a matter fur conjecture.<br />
s. A. C.<br />
SHEWBREAD<br />
'The Mi~riter or Curhirer were among Israel's chief foes.<br />
Most, however, with Dillmann, interpret jnx#?) in<br />
the sense of ' tum~~lt' (so RV).<br />
2. 1 Ch. 1 I, Rv SETH (u.v.). T. K. C.<br />
SHETEAR (lQW), in Esth. 1x4, MT, one of the<br />
, .<br />
'seven Lrinces' at the court of Ahasuerus. eFs<br />
Sama3-bil(or -bni?)-uyur-i.e.. ,O Sun-god<br />
1 CA~CA~AIOC [BuL@I, capfcecoc [A1 seems to re-<br />
~rotect the son' : CD Zaw8auviuor iree I present both SHGTHAR and TAKSHISH. Aceordine to<br />
1 'Marquart (Fund. 69). Shethar comes from -n.,w, h.ith<br />
which, however, compare the 0. Pers. iiyoti~ 'joy.'<br />
This presupposes the nccepted view that the scene of<br />
the first ele&nt in the name. The only dkculty in the Esther-story was always laid in Persia, and that<br />
this view is the w for Ass. r ; but this is hardly insuperconsequently<br />
the names may be exp-trd to have a<br />
able. Acceotine . .. 6's - form Sanabasrar for Sheshbazzar<br />
Persian appearance. For another explanation see<br />
we are enabled to accept the very plausible identification<br />
PL.RIM, 5 3. and cp TAXBHISH.<br />
afSan(a)basiar withshenazzar (I Ch. 3.8). first proposed<br />
by lmbert (1888.89). and accepted by Sir H. Howorth, SFLETEAR-BOPrAI. RV SHETHA~-BOZEN~<br />
Renm, and Ed. Meyer(Bnt. dnl Jud. 7,fl). Upon this +)lia, caeapBoyzawa. -AN [B]. -NAI. -NE [A]. ~APhypotherir<br />
San(a)barrar was not identical with Zerub- Boyza~aloc [L]). The name of a Persian (?) official.<br />
babel iso van Hoonaeker. Wellhaurenl. ,, hut his uncle mentioned with Tattenai. Ezra536 66x3 r Erd.63<br />
~~~~<br />
and predecessor That SANRAL.L*T (q-v.) and the firrt (anOpogou(m~~~ [B.4], -Po(. [L]) 7 (-PoupC [B], -pou(.<br />
governor of the Jews should have had names com- [.4], -flu( [Ll) 627 71 (-@out. [BA]. -puC. [LI). AV<br />
pounded with Sin would be a striking coincidence. But SArxaaSazANEs. Four explanations may be menthough<br />
this may have been the Learned redactor's mean- tioned : the fourth assumes that underlying the present<br />
ing, it is doubtful whether the original narrator intended narrative there is an earlier story of the relations between<br />
it. The chief captivity may have been in N. Arabia. the Jews and the N Arndian governors.<br />
In this case the firrt part of the name Sherhbazzar would (I) Shethar-boznai may be a corruption of r>nlulc=<br />
represent (Curh in N. Arabia) ; the second part MtOpopou[dvnr,Old Perr. 'Mithrobauzana'-i,r., ' having<br />
might possibly come from mw (Zarephath). Cp redemption through the Mithra." (2) Marquart takrs a<br />
SmNazzan, ZenuseneEL.<br />
different view (Fs'und. 53 f ). He equates mYi with Old<br />
In Ezra18 Sheshbazzar is called loosely 'prince of<br />
Judah' (a?rn,j x.3); in 514 he is called 'governor'<br />
Per9.p ('see," brilliance')<br />
pun ed with thlr word.2<br />
and quotes names com~<br />
(3) Wincklrr (Xohut Semitic<br />
a, (a$ the same title which is given to Studier, 34 f ), however, considers that 713 mu may tx<br />
the title of an official (eg, chief clerk of the chancery),<br />
Zerubbabel in Haggai (11 zr 22 =I). He<br />
:<br />
is raid to have received from Cyrus'r official the sacred<br />
and compares the inscription on a weight from Abydos,<br />
vessels which Nebuchadrerrar had taken away with a<br />
where wnc, wmn is attested as such a title. In this care,<br />
charge to deposit them in the temple at Jerusalem when<br />
for uld we must read ,nw. But the second part of the<br />
it had been rebuilt. In 516 TATTENAI (p.~.) mentions<br />
I title . seems lncorrecfly transmitted. Winckler's reason<br />
that the foundations of the temple had been laid by that i 'e. is not followed, as we should have expected,<br />
Shesbbazrar. Korters fHer~tcl . ??I admits that he is<br />
a description of the office of the person so cnlled.<br />
probably a historical personage, and that he bear. a (4) Upon the theory mentioned above, it is at any rate<br />
Babylonian name, but thinks that he was a Persian.<br />
possible that ,nu comer from wwul (TARSWISH [p.v.]),<br />
and that the Chronicler introduces a Shenazzar into the ' the original of which may be *?de, and isa from ,?$r..<br />
genealogy of Zerubbabelfrom interested motives. That<br />
'Arshurite' and .Cushanite' are two N. Arabian<br />
Sherhbazzar brought back the sacred vessels, and laid 1 ethnics, used . perhaps . ar personal names. See Lrit.<br />
the foundations of the temo1e. Korters denies. On - the<br />
Bib. T. K. C.<br />
~<br />
of<br />
the land of the captivity and of the circumstances attend-<br />
%. s. (~tb. u:?); see S~RAT*H (T).<br />
two latter points see in&<br />
bearing in mind the possibility<br />
rr. pp. nxxv. 281 J. but<br />
that different views of<br />
SEEVA (N~w). I. b. Caleb b. Henon, the .father'<br />
MACRBENA (I Ch.Zr9; .rmv [Bl,-A [A], oour [L]).<br />
ing the gradual lightening of the burdens of the Jews<br />
mny have ken taken by the narrator and the redactor SHEWBRE~D (~$181 nn$. Menr hog-gtzim, lit.<br />
respectively. But cp Meyer, Emf. dri Jxd., pp. 7sfl ;<br />
Gulhe, CVI 245 ; Winckler. K.4Tl31 285, with refer.<br />
ences (Sherhbazznr a son of Jehoiachin) : and see EZRA<br />
AND NXHEM~AH [BOOKS], 5 7.<br />
Thp identification of Sherhbamrnnd Shena.rar(Shen'arrar) is<br />
questtoned by Lshr (ThroI. Rwnd$c&u, 1 x81$), hut justified<br />
With the sxceptlon of I K. (I z Ch. 4 '9). a"d ' S. only in P.<br />
Other expresrionr arc (a) Iiiir-r hof-tsmid, ~ mna mi, EV<br />
'the continual br-d'(Nu.4, [PI, oi dpror oi Std iiwrdc); (6)<br />
I. hcnr-,'Zrn&u, z Ch. 9 jz (AVmg. 'bread oi ardenng'),<br />
mnnr&kdh L 2 Ch. 13- (a. i npo6iorur, Vg. as above): (c)<br />
by Ed. ?I?yer (ZATW18313f.). who refzm to the d~eerent<br />
pronunslhflon of the sibilants in Assyrian and Babylonian, and<br />
explxini the differences in the reproduction of there nrmer by<br />
differences of pronunciation. T. K. C.<br />
SHETH (nzi. c~e). I. Nu. 2417t. regarded by<br />
AV. RVW, 6, Vg., Pesh.. z a proper name, on the<br />
asrumption that Seth the son of Adam is intended : this<br />
is in fact the old Jewish tradition-the 'sons of Sheth'<br />
are the (sons of men' (Onk.), the 'armies of Gog'<br />
(pz-Jon.). The assumption is untenable: but at any<br />
rate Sheth must be a proper name. The sceptre of<br />
Israel, we are told. 'shall smite the temples of Moab,<br />
and the crown of the head of all the sons of Sheth.'<br />
The name might come from the Suti, theSyrian Bedouins<br />
mentioned in the Amarna Tablets. But in the parallel<br />
parrage, Jei. 4841, we find [in$ for nd, and this suggests<br />
]$j, 'Cushan' (cp Crir Bib. on Am. 2 ~). For ~:c,<br />
' Moab.' read probably ,re, ' Mi~ur<br />
' (cp hloas, 5 14).<br />
'bread of the faee' or ' presence-bread' (RVmE). See<br />
SACRIFICE, % 14, 34a: RITUAI., 5 2; TEMPLE, 8<br />
16, and ALTAR, 5 lo (8).<br />
e Zp.0~ TOO npom&nou (I S. 217LaI), a. [erl npoamuc (Ex.<br />
402, [where cni occurr alons1, z Ch. 419), a 7. .~.+Qapa~<br />
(r K. 7,s). . i!w"tmr (Ex. 23 30): vg. fienrr ..3m"..30~i*ionir.<br />
I. &, I 5.21 5 ('hallowed [RV "holy "I bread' : a. Z cat).<br />
.timmem (Blitfogg rur fi.csn