cheenc03a.pdf

SIMON PETER
111. ACCORDING TO THE FOURTH GOSPEL.
If we turn now to the utterances of the FourthGospel
less regarding Peter, we shall find that some of
them rest upon those of the synoptists and
divergent have merely received a Johannine colouring :
bmt that others. where they contain new
matter, cannot lay clvihn to historicity.
,.I, Lhc nr~n.l .{pr I 11 I li... .)I., :I#: ...t$nt
(hlk 1 I>"-;, .,..I 15 il.,lr .I). 1 a J .I..L:IIIII. Ill dc,:r,I,-
. .
. a. 1 . * I,.? dl < $ L "* s,,?,"AI ,,,~.$,,,~,,;
d 3 I I " r 8 . . '\\'"l,lcr I ;o. ),. ..nllol ro,n.
wielded the sword whilst the syndptistr merely say: 'A
certain oneof them that stood bv' ihlk. 14~~1.
orwords
SIMON PETER
believed and know' (cp 11~71131Jn. 4 16). Finally, wc note
the absence of any word of recognltlon on the prrt oiJeru* such
a we find in at Icat hlt. 16 17.
(d) According to Jn. I*, Uethsaida ir the city of Peter
(and Andrew) : according to Mk. Izi sg= Lk. 431 38, an
dso according to Mt. 8s I+, it is Caprrz~aun~.
1n of the dircrepa~~cy it is susgcrrad that Peter
(and Andrew) belonged to liethralds; or rrrvurrc is
evzn had to the wholly ,nadmtu~ble xegcr~rth~l~~~~~di~~to
ihe
change of
in Jn. 144 Philip wL3m virtue oi h1r then
domicile 'oi' Bethsnlda(irbBnB~at6n) but by birth he was '0°C
?r' Capernaum the city of Andrew ?r~d Perer (2s nir rdhrwc
ndpsu x,; nirpou) In rerll!y II 13 even uncsrrain ~ h~th:~
fhc mmine of Bethrahda has clalrn or onlv maker claim to hlrto.ic2.1
acG..cy. cp PxIL,", co1. p7ra, r;. 2.
In the account of the denial of Peter (Jn. 18x5-27)-
(a) The most important differences a. compared with
the rynoptirts (Mk. 1454 a6-pand s ) are that Peter gains
19, Deni al,, access 10 the palace of the high priert
through the intervention of an 'other
I'der, lhks 21, xhe ih.ts,l - >.> f 1s ...- LC, ~tl.~r g.-t rhrv. Upon both these points see
. . . l,O,,!, w1.y .a"!. ,
5 zz, begin. Legendary
I i"I1 w ,I.