cheenc03a.pdf
cheenc03a.pdf
cheenc03a.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
~~~ ~~~ ~ ~<br />
SINAI AND HOREB<br />
however, so also in the present instance,.a comparison<br />
of the different sources shows that relative objects of<br />
worshio. .. or the earthlv , conies . of heavenlv ,. olacer. . are<br />
located by the various source. or traditions in very<br />
diverse situations. This holds good of the mountain<br />
uoon which Yahwe dwells, exactlv as it holds eood - of<br />
any other sent of deity. Every nation, or every tribe,<br />
must necessarily point to it within its own domain ;<br />
but, as in every nation and state various strata of<br />
culture and . population . are reprerellted, and in the<br />
course of time also various doctrines arise, so, in like<br />
manner, different localisations can be handed down in<br />
the various strata of the tradition. A clasricnl exam~le<br />
of thi. is presented by Mtr. Ebal and Gerizim (ice<br />
above. 5 3). The tradition (J) which places them<br />
beside Shechem has held its ground victoriously. In<br />
their cosmic meaning, however, aa the two summits of<br />
the Mountain of the World, they nn be shown to have<br />
been held in reverence aim in other seats of worrhip,<br />
in the territory of other gods as well as at Shechem<br />
(Ephraim). So, for example, in the domain of worship<br />
of the once more extensive tribe (Winckler, GI 2) of<br />
Benjamin, in the region of Bethel. This is the meaning<br />
of the gloss in Dt. 1130 (cp GEnrzlM, 3 2): they are<br />
situated near the Gilzal. ". the oolitieal . centre of Beniamin<br />
which stands in connection with the sanctuary of Bethel.<br />
Ebal and Gerizim are other names for jachin and<br />
Boar in so far as there stand for definite cormolosical<br />
ideas (N. and S., or E, and W. point) precisely as<br />
Sinai and Horeb do. Thur no dificulty ought to .be<br />
felt if the mountain of Yahwe also ir placed in various<br />
localities. The view which brings it into<br />
yL2- connection with the Kenite tribe and which<br />
we must regard as the oldest, doubtleu has<br />
in mind not the Sinaitic peninsula, but the region to the<br />
S. of Judah, that ir to say Edom. This still finds clear<br />
expresrion in thesong of Deborah (Judg. 5,): 'Yahwe,<br />
when thou eoest forth from Se'ir and comest down from<br />
the mounturn (a,u=Ass. iadd; FIELD, 1)ofEdom' ;<br />
similarly airo in Dl. 332' (see Pnnax, and cp We.<br />
Prvl.t31 359, and Di. ad loc.). In like manner I K. 198<br />
originally placed Horeb (thus belongmg to E, the<br />
oldrrf source on which Dt. rests) in the region of<br />
Edom, that is. of Km. fur Eliiah cannot hare undertaken<br />
any remote desert journey when he ir already<br />
a1 the point of fainting at the ciore of a single day."<br />
The fortv davs were first introduced in order to establish<br />
a p&ail~lism with the Mores-lege~d.~ The words<br />
of the song of ~eborah (~udg. 5 ~ indicate ) that even the<br />
tradition which usedthe name Sinai war influenced by the<br />
Same view with regard to its situation. This would go<br />
to show that the Yahwirric tmdition also-for~t. follo\rs<br />
E (cp, 5 I)-looked at matter, in the samelight. J and<br />
E, however, comprise the whole tradition which comes<br />
from the times of Juduh's national existence. This<br />
would be in entire agreement with nll that we have to<br />
presuppose for a period, the conceptionr of which<br />
must have confined themselves within the limits of the<br />
Post- 'LC~UBI and possible. The free play of fancy,<br />
... as well us the enlareement of the claims of<br />
exurn. Judah to ierritory-outiide of its proprr<br />
limits. could 6rst come to their rights only after the<br />
nation had been torn awav from its native soil, when<br />
Judah had corne to be no longer i3 nation but only a<br />
religious community, the sphere of whose activity was<br />
1 I C nt.3316, ~ where ~cnan, wellhausen, and Sreuernagel<br />
read ' ~ (?)Y, p 'he who dw~llr in Sinai.']<br />
Z wi. GI i 23 : smend A 71i& R I L - ~ ~ 35. ~ c[See L ~ 21s ~<br />
PROPHET S$ 7 9. ~it;el (HA7 Em. 150) still suppowr the<br />
Horeb dthe nnrratiue to be in'the sinnitic peninsula; ro too<br />
v ~ call, ? ani~,=l. K%ltsmtrm, ,5 (CP ~itt*~, Er+un&,lZ1<br />
nu. z Abrchn. 1, p. 576). A ~~rn~wh~t keener cntlclirn ai<br />
text, however, advcr.. thll ~rit. ~ib. on<br />
1 K.198). Cp rhe remark on col. 1~72, liner X~$-T. 5. c.1<br />
1 Ex. 24.8 [PI. The forty diiyr of abiencc in the wtldernerr<br />
(cp the temptntiun oijeru.). on the significance ofthe number<br />
see Wi. G* 2 zsp & (cp NUMBER, 181.<br />
SINAI AND HOREB<br />
limited only by the bounds of the civilisation of Hither<br />
Aria.<br />
The writing which arose out of such ideas ar there is<br />
what is now known as P; we could, almort, therefore.<br />
have guessed beforehand that the transference uf the<br />
cosmic idea of Sinai as the seat of Yahwe to the<br />
Sinaitic peninsula proceeds from this source or from<br />
the view- up011 \\.h