28.12.2013 Views

cheenc03a.pdf

cheenc03a.pdf

cheenc03a.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SHAMGAR<br />

;l~slgned to Samson.' When >re consider that the legend<br />

(zS. 23,,/) uf Shnnunsh ben Agee, one of D,xrid's<br />

heroes, has also been influenced bv the Samson-story,<br />

such license would nut be surprising. Note aiso that<br />

ail these names hegin with =v (ih-rrr). The chief object<br />

of the insertion of Judg. 331 would be to explain the<br />

obscure phrwe 'in the days of Shamcar ben Anath' in<br />

But who was the true ' Shamger' (Judg. 56)? Moore<br />

(Judger, 106) and Marquart (F>'nd. 3) have soggerted<br />

that he may have been a Hittite king.<br />

,, Ju dg.S<br />

Sangarn was the name of a (Hittite) king<br />

of Cachemiih in the time of Aiur-nasir-oal and Shalmhneser<br />

11. Moorealsoreferr, in i1lusf;at;on of ' Sisera:<br />

to the nurneraur Hittite names in -rim (et.. HtQrira,<br />

WMM As. u. Esr. 332), whilst >l.larquart compares the<br />

name Pi-~in(i), borne by the last king of Carchemish<br />

(cp Del. Par. $70)~ and Ball' refers (for ' ben Anath 'j<br />

to Bur-anati, the name of the king of Ywbuk whom<br />

Shalmanerei 11. mentions as an ally of Sangnra (KB<br />

1x5~; cp ISHBAK). The song, however, is so often<br />

corrupt thvt the question of the names Shamgar and<br />

Sirera needs to be re~examined in connection with a<br />

thorough critical revirion of the text of Judg. 5. The<br />

main historical result of such a revision appears to the<br />

present writer ro be that the foes by whom the Israelites<br />

were oppressed were N. Arabians, variously called leak<br />

meelitcs. Irhmaelites, Cnshiter, Asshurires, and Kenizzifer.<br />

and that v. 6 should run thus :<br />

In the days of Jerahmeel son of Anak,s<br />

In the days of Curhrm and Ishmael.<br />

,i~w. 'Shamgar' (?), ir in fact a scribe's mixture of<br />

iximv. and i~~rn.. and the scribe himself corrected his<br />

error.* while N , D ~ is a corruption of the ethnic name<br />

,I.!. ' Asrhur,' a collateral form of which was probably<br />

,rdi. 'Geihur' (see G~saun, 2). Now perhaps we can<br />

see how , Jabin' and ' Sirera' both appear in the story.<br />

' Jabin' (B*, twice Jamin) ir one of the corrup,ions of<br />

. Jerahmeel.' SO that the king of Kenaz (I)?, not iyl>),<br />

whore capital was K.idesh[~barnea], might equally well<br />

be called ' Jerahmeel ' and ' Asrhur.' That ' Sisera '<br />

rcpresentr a N. Arabian ethnic name may aiso be presunled<br />

from its occurrence in the list of the families of<br />

on 56.<br />

, .<br />

J There are quite ruffisient parallels for thereand the prscsdingemendatiunr.<br />

DU frcqurnrly springs out of hWw, =od<br />

now dirr<br />

4 Srnif!~?~~ (mrav IBI, irrrcar [A],<br />

[Ll).<br />

1 The fonres Ssntlr, rith which some have identified<br />

BETHYLIA [ v I, h been thovgbt of by Schwan far Shamir,<br />

but cao har&hnvc eome within Irrachar. Cp Moore, d ,~.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!