21.01.2014 Views

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Solar</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Perspectives</strong>: <strong>Solar</strong> photovoltaics<br />

Figure 6.1 The photovoltaic effect<br />

Junction<br />

Current<br />

Load<br />

Photons<br />

Electron flow<br />

N-type silicon<br />

P-type silicon<br />

“Hole” flow<br />

Source: EPIA, 2011.<br />

Key point<br />

Photovoltaic systems directly convert light into electricity.<br />

PV cells, modules and systems have an excellent track record of progressive cost reductions,<br />

with a learning rate of about 20% for modules, and about 12.5% for systems. This means that<br />

each doubling of the cumulative installed capacity has led to a cost reduction for modules of<br />

about 20%. 1 The historical learning rate for PV modules was actually 22.8% per year on<br />

average over 1976-2003.<br />

Three major factors driving cost reductions from 1980 to 2001 have been identified: manufacturing<br />

plant size, module efficiency and purified silicon cost. The driving role of scaling-up in cost<br />

reduction is also demonstrated by the success of some new entrants, which were able to raise<br />

capital and take on the risk of large investments but offered no technical superiority. Ten out of<br />

the 16 major advances in module efficiency can be traced back to government and university<br />

research and development programmes, while the other six were accomplished in companies<br />

manufacturing PV cells. Finally, reductions in the cost of purified silicon were a spill-over benefit<br />

from manufacturing improvements in the microprocessor industry (Nemet, 2006).<br />

From 2004 to 2007, however, a bottleneck in the production of purified silicon led to a steep<br />

increase in its cost (Figure 6.2), resulting in a slight increase in PV costs, seemingly a violation<br />

of the learning curve concept.<br />

1. Progress ratio is another way of expressing the same reality and is calculated at 1 minus the learning rate, or about 80% in this<br />

case (the lower the progress ratio, the faster the progress).<br />

112<br />

© OECD/<strong>IEA</strong>, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!