21.01.2014 Views

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 11: Testing the limits<br />

transitions of energy systems that rely to a large extent on low-carbon, noncombustible<br />

energy sources.<br />

Using the direct equivalent method in a scenario with high-level penetration of<br />

renewables other than combustible biomass allows comparing the high-level solar<br />

“big picture” of this publication with the recent IPCC Special Report on Renewable<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> (IPCC 2011).<br />

Primary energy needs (direct equivalent method) would by 2060 – 2065 be of<br />

about 165 000 TWh, under the assumptions of conversion efficiencies of 40% in<br />

electricity generation from combustibles, 85% in heat from combustibles, and<br />

60% in manufacturing biofuels, and accounting for losses in electricity storage and<br />

in CCS. The contribution of solar energy to these primary energy needs would be<br />

about 60 000 TWh 4 or 216 exajoules (Ej). With 36% of primary energy needs<br />

(approximately the same share of final energy demand), the solar contribution<br />

shown here is significantly higher than the estimates for direct solar energy by<br />

2050 in the scenarios published before 2009 and analysed by the IPCC (2011),<br />

though more recent analyses have stretched the possible contribution from solar<br />

even higher.<br />

Note that with ambient heat, derived mostly from solar energy (and some geothermal<br />

heat), about 30 000 TWh of useful energy is neither taken into account in primary<br />

energy needs nor in final energy demand. Taking ambient heat into account, primary<br />

energy needs would have to be counted at 195 000 TWh for an overall final energy<br />

use of 170 000 TWh. On both accounts, the contribution of solar energy would come<br />

close to 50%.<br />

The numbers in this chapter are enough to make one’s head spin and may seem unrealistic<br />

to many. However, it is the sheer size of the energy system in 50 years from now that is<br />

vertiginous. Without a very large application of renewables, the scale of the environmental<br />

issues (not just climate change) associated with considerable use of fossil fuels during this<br />

century raises the greatest concerns.<br />

The economic burden of making the required energy resources available on such immense<br />

scale is hardly less problematic. As the likely convergence of costs of various energy sources<br />

around 2030 suggests, the size of the necessary investments, in solar plants, grids, storage<br />

facilities, nuclear power plants, oil and gas wells, refineries, coal mines, and power plants,<br />

would be roughly similar whatever path is followed.<br />

The energy system of 2065 is almost entirely for us to build. In doing so, we face many<br />

uncertainties, but some things are already clear. The future energy system will face many<br />

constraints and challenges. In order to cope successfully, the system will need to be widely<br />

diverse; no one technology can or should dominate. As it must, such a system will give<br />

4. 20 000 TWh from PV (including storage losses), 25 000 TWh STE, 5 000 TWh th solar heat, 6 000 TWh th solar fuels, and 10% of<br />

a total primary energy in biomass of 40 000 TWh.<br />

213<br />

© OECD/<strong>IEA</strong>, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!