21.01.2014 Views

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Solar</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Perspectives</strong>: <strong>Solar</strong> electricity<br />

Another <strong>IEA</strong> study (Inage, 2009) confirms that in this range (10% to 12%) of penetration, PV<br />

does not significantly increase the need for electricity storage. The BLUE Map Scenario for<br />

Western Europe of ETP 2008 put the contribution of wind power at 27%. The assumed net<br />

wind power variability would require electricity storage capacities of 39.8 GW by 2020.<br />

Adding 12% PV in Western Europe by 2020, as originally suggested by the <strong>Solar</strong> Europe<br />

Industry Initiative (SEII) and considered in the High Ren Scenario of ETP 2010 would raise<br />

the requirement for storage only slightly to 42.8 GW.<br />

Harnessing variable renewables<br />

In Harnessing Variable Renewables: A guide to the balancing challenge, the <strong>IEA</strong><br />

(2011c ) studied a range of quite different power systems and showed how different<br />

the potential flexibility might be from one system to another, which is greater than<br />

usually thought. Similarly, the existing technical potential for flexibility is often much<br />

greater than the available potential – due to various barriers, which can be partially<br />

or totally removed (Figure 3.6).<br />

Drivers to make best use of existing flexible resources include strong and smart grids<br />

and flexible markets, but optimisation strategies would vary from place to place.<br />

Contrary to common belief, the introduction of variable renewable generating<br />

capacities does not require a “megawatt for megawatt” back-up, but rather holistic<br />

planning of flexible resources to cover net system variability. The addition of more<br />

flexible generating capacities as back-up might still be needed, but it is important to<br />

realise that such capacities will be run only rarely, and this is what makes building<br />

them fully compatible with low GHG emission scenarios.<br />

In addition, significant current capacities, especially of flexible gas, will remain<br />

online in the coming decades, notably in industrialised countries (e.g. Italy, Japan,<br />

Spain, and the United States). Their capacity factor will decrease, either from now on<br />

or later (including after an increase as older coal plants are closed). To be kept alive,<br />

and ready as spinning reserves, flexible capacity might require some specific<br />

incentives, but in many cases there will be no or little need to build greenfield fossilfuelled<br />

plants for backup.<br />

This study shows that the variability of PV, which matches demand peaks better than<br />

wind power and is relatively predictable, is unlikely to raise substantive issues for<br />

managing grids. This is assuming PV generation achieves the levels considered in<br />

several scenarios of about 10% to 12% – although at different dates for different<br />

scenarios.<br />

52<br />

There will be, for sure, balancing costs for grid operators. In some areas, the total<br />

of distributed small-scale capacities can be greater than local demand could<br />

absorb at peak times. This means that the distribution and transport grids would<br />

have to work both ways. Most existing transformers allow only one-way<br />

conversions of high voltage (for transport) to lower voltage (for distribution).<br />

However, these costs will remain limited and not likely to prevent PV’s 10% to<br />

12% share.<br />

© OECD/<strong>IEA</strong>, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!