21.01.2014 Views

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 7: <strong>Solar</strong> heat<br />

Figure 7.10 Blocking, shading and cosine losses in heliostat fields<br />

Incident<br />

solar flux<br />

Blocking loss<br />

Heliostat<br />

Cosine loss<br />

Shadowing loss<br />

Source: Stine and Geyer, 2011.<br />

Key point<br />

Heliostats must be distanced from each other to minimise blocking and shading.<br />

Field design optimisation also depends on the desired power. Typical heliostat fields in low<br />

latitudes tend to be circular and surround the central receiver, while in higher latitudes they<br />

tend to be semi-circular, to reduce cosine losses. Small fields will be more concentrated to<br />

the polar side of the tower, larger ones more circular, as atmospheric attenuation reduces the<br />

efficiency of far-field heliostats.<br />

While linear systems require flat land areas, central receiver systems may accommodate<br />

some slope, or even benefit from it as it could reduce blocking and shadowing, and allow<br />

increasing heliostat density.<br />

There are two basic receiver designs: external and cavity. External receivers offer vertical pipes<br />

to the concentrated solar flux from the heliostats, in which a heat transfer or working fluid<br />

circulates. In case of direct steam generation, different heliostats might be pointed to two or<br />

three different stages where the water is pre-heated, then vaporised, and if required the steam<br />

superheated. In the cavity design, the solar flux enters the cavity, possibly closed by a window.<br />

“Beam-down” designs use a secondary reflector on top of the tower, of hyperboloid shape,<br />

which redirects the concentrated solar flux to ground level, where it might be refocused by<br />

a secondary compound parabolic concentrator before it falls on the receiver (Photo 7.8). This<br />

design, conceived and first assembled at the Weizmann Institute in Israel, reduces optical<br />

efficiency but conveniently allows keeping the receiver at ground level.<br />

Heat transfer or working fluids, or reactants, are specific to the applications and are described<br />

in Chapters 5, 8 and 9.<br />

Recently, scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have suggested a simpler<br />

concept called CSPond – provided hilly landscape. Light from a hillside of mirrors goes<br />

through a small open window in a small insulated building and is volumetrically absorbed<br />

137<br />

© OECD/<strong>IEA</strong>, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!