21.01.2014 Views

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6: <strong>Solar</strong> photovoltaics<br />

southern Europe, despite the high energy cost of semiconductor-grade silicon (1 GJ/kg).<br />

Automated recycling is already an industrial reality: 95% of the modules, but only about 72%<br />

of the silicon, can be recycled. Some manufacturers already provide Si-PV systems with no<br />

silver contacts, thereby avoiding possible cost issues should a rapidly-expanding PV industry<br />

become a price maker for silver.<br />

Figure 6.6 Utility-scale PV price forecast<br />

Other<br />

Engineering,<br />

procurement<br />

and construction<br />

Balance<br />

of plant<br />

Inverter<br />

Module<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

USD/W<br />

3.12<br />

0.18 USD/W<br />

0.41 2.74<br />

USD/W<br />

0.18 2.49 USD/W<br />

0.50 0.41 0.17 2.31 USD/W<br />

0.39 0.17 2.10 USD/W<br />

0.50<br />

0.38<br />

1.96 USD/W<br />

0.16<br />

1.82<br />

USD/W<br />

0.30<br />

0.47<br />

0.36 0.16<br />

1.70 USD/W<br />

1.59<br />

USD/W<br />

1.49<br />

USD/W<br />

1.72<br />

0.46<br />

0.35 0.15<br />

0.30<br />

0.44<br />

0.33<br />

0.15<br />

0.32 0.15<br />

1.39<br />

0.27<br />

0.31<br />

0.14<br />

0.14<br />

1.35<br />

0.25<br />

1.18<br />

0.42<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.39<br />

0.28<br />

0.23<br />

1.06<br />

0.37<br />

0.21<br />

0.36<br />

0.91<br />

0.19<br />

0.35<br />

0.82<br />

0.18<br />

0.74<br />

0.16<br />

0.67<br />

0.15<br />

0.60<br />

0.14<br />

0.54 0.49<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

2017<br />

2018<br />

2019<br />

2020<br />

Note: Module price derives from experience curve + margin; system price in markets with cost-based, rather than value-based pricing<br />

(such as Germany).<br />

Source: Bloomberg New <strong>Energy</strong> Finance.<br />

Figure 6.6<br />

Key point<br />

Module costs will soon represent only one-third of utility-scale PV systems.<br />

If silicon is unlimited, some elements of non-silicon thin films are not. CdTe thin films need<br />

cadmium, a by-product of zinc mining, and tellurium, a by-product of copper processing.<br />

The latter’s availability in the long term may depend on whether the copper industry can<br />

optimise extraction, refining and recycling yields. CIS and CIGS thin films need selenium,<br />

gallium and indium. The latter is found in tin and tungsten ores, but its extraction could drive<br />

the prices higher.<br />

Overall, the target costs up to 2030 noted above appear in line with both historical experience<br />

and detailed consideration of future improvements. Beyond 2030, the learning curve may<br />

either slowly flatten out and reach what has been termed a PV “floor price”, or experience<br />

new downward shifts as novel devices kick in. In both cases the USD 1/W p mark for full PV<br />

systems will likely be hit and overcome, while some experts see the USD 0.50/W p mark<br />

being ultimately achievable.<br />

Building-integrated PV offers the possibility that a thin layer of PV-active material will<br />

become almost a standard feature of building elements such as roof tiles, façade materials,<br />

glasses and windows, just as double-glazed windows have become standard in most<br />

countries. With very large-scale mass production, and support elements having a primary<br />

role in building support or closure, the cost of PV would almost vanish in the market segment<br />

where it currently costs the most. PV roof costs may never meet a floor price.<br />

121<br />

© OECD/<strong>IEA</strong>, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!