Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA
Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA
Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Solar</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Perspectives</strong>: <strong>Solar</strong> electricity<br />
Morocco is not unique; other countries, mostly developing ones, such as India, show evening<br />
peaks. More often there is a relatively good match between the solar resource generation and<br />
peak demand, despite peak and mid-peak demand extending into the late afternoon and<br />
evening (Figure 3.9).<br />
Photo 3.1 The Gemasolar power tower near Sevilla (Spain)<br />
Source: Torresol <strong>Energy</strong>.<br />
Key point<br />
Molten-salts solar towers can generate electricity round the clock.<br />
Seen by many as competitors, PV and STE should thus be viewed rather as complementary.<br />
PV is variable, STE can be made firm through thermal storage and fossil-fuel back-up.<br />
STE technologies without storage may face tough competition from either concentrating PV<br />
(CPV) technologies or thin films, both of which are less sensitive than standard silicon<br />
modules to high ambient temperatures, in areas where the peak closely matches the sunshine.<br />
More often, STE with thermal storage should be compared with PV plus electricity storage.<br />
Such a comparison puts STE in a better competitive situation.<br />
Hybridisation of solar fields on existing fossil-fuelled plants offers options – but only to STE –<br />
for introducing solar in the electricity mix at a lower cost than “full-fledged” STE plants, as the<br />
cost of non-solar specific parts of the plants (turbines, balance of plants, interconnection)<br />
would be shared with another technology, or be already paid for in existing plants. In the latter<br />
case, only the cost of the solar field and possible thermal storage would have to be considered<br />
(see Chapter 8), roughly halving the investment costs required to generate STE electricity.<br />
Currently, STE is available only as concentrating solar power (CSP), which make economic<br />
sense only in areas with high DNI (see Chapters 2 and 8). The best examples of such areas<br />
are in Australia, Chile, Mexico, the Middle East, North Africa, South Africa, and the<br />
southwestern United States, but many other places are suitable, notably in China, India,<br />
Latin-America and south Europe.<br />
Consistent with the BLUE Hi-Ren Scenario of ETP 2010, the <strong>IEA</strong> Technology Roadmap:<br />
Concentrating <strong>Solar</strong> Power foresees, by 2050, CSP contributing up to 40% of electricity<br />
generation in regions with very favourable conditions (<strong>IEA</strong>, 2010d); 15% or 20% for large<br />
consuming areas close to very favourable regions, and lower levels for other areas (Table 3.1).<br />
56<br />
© OECD/<strong>IEA</strong>, 2011