21.01.2014 Views

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

Solar Energy Perspectives - IEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Solar</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Perspectives</strong>: <strong>Solar</strong> electricity<br />

Morocco is not unique; other countries, mostly developing ones, such as India, show evening<br />

peaks. More often there is a relatively good match between the solar resource generation and<br />

peak demand, despite peak and mid-peak demand extending into the late afternoon and<br />

evening (Figure 3.9).<br />

Photo 3.1 The Gemasolar power tower near Sevilla (Spain)<br />

Source: Torresol <strong>Energy</strong>.<br />

Key point<br />

Molten-salts solar towers can generate electricity round the clock.<br />

Seen by many as competitors, PV and STE should thus be viewed rather as complementary.<br />

PV is variable, STE can be made firm through thermal storage and fossil-fuel back-up.<br />

STE technologies without storage may face tough competition from either concentrating PV<br />

(CPV) technologies or thin films, both of which are less sensitive than standard silicon<br />

modules to high ambient temperatures, in areas where the peak closely matches the sunshine.<br />

More often, STE with thermal storage should be compared with PV plus electricity storage.<br />

Such a comparison puts STE in a better competitive situation.<br />

Hybridisation of solar fields on existing fossil-fuelled plants offers options – but only to STE –<br />

for introducing solar in the electricity mix at a lower cost than “full-fledged” STE plants, as the<br />

cost of non-solar specific parts of the plants (turbines, balance of plants, interconnection)<br />

would be shared with another technology, or be already paid for in existing plants. In the latter<br />

case, only the cost of the solar field and possible thermal storage would have to be considered<br />

(see Chapter 8), roughly halving the investment costs required to generate STE electricity.<br />

Currently, STE is available only as concentrating solar power (CSP), which make economic<br />

sense only in areas with high DNI (see Chapters 2 and 8). The best examples of such areas<br />

are in Australia, Chile, Mexico, the Middle East, North Africa, South Africa, and the<br />

southwestern United States, but many other places are suitable, notably in China, India,<br />

Latin-America and south Europe.<br />

Consistent with the BLUE Hi-Ren Scenario of ETP 2010, the <strong>IEA</strong> Technology Roadmap:<br />

Concentrating <strong>Solar</strong> Power foresees, by 2050, CSP contributing up to 40% of electricity<br />

generation in regions with very favourable conditions (<strong>IEA</strong>, 2010d); 15% or 20% for large<br />

consuming areas close to very favourable regions, and lower levels for other areas (Table 3.1).<br />

56<br />

© OECD/<strong>IEA</strong>, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!