06.04.2014 Views

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. THE CULTURAL FABRIC OF CITIES<br />

The spatial distribution of employment, by industry<br />

The first, <strong>and</strong> most widespread, approach is that taken by Scott in his work “The<br />

Cultural Economy of Cities” (Scott, 2000). Using employment statistics for different<br />

economic sectors, he attempts to demonstrate linkages between the degree of<br />

concentration of such employment <strong>and</strong> urban phenomena. He shows, for example,<br />

that in the United States the cultural industries are concentrated primarily in<br />

metropolitan areas (cities of over one million). These cities are home to 52% of the<br />

American working population, yet they account for 96.8% of jobs in moviemaking, 77%<br />

in architecture, <strong>and</strong> 66% in book publishing. Table 4.3. shows that the urban concentration<br />

of cultural industries is very high (with the exception of radio <strong>and</strong> television, which<br />

reflects the great number of local broadcasting stations), while other industries that<br />

we might class as creative industries are less highly concentrated: musical instrument<br />

making, decorative wooden objects, etc..<br />

Table 4.3. The urban concentration of cultural industries<br />

Activity Number of jobs Number of jobs % of sector jobs in<br />

in metropolitan in the USA (000). metropolitan<br />

areas (000) areas (%)<br />

Cinema 241 249 96.8<br />

Radio/TV 102 221 46<br />

Book publishing 53 79 66<br />

Newspapers 190 417 45<br />

Architecture 93 121 77<br />

Musical instruments 3 12 26<br />

Jewellery 29 46 63<br />

Leatherworking 4 11 42<br />

Woodworking 26 121 23<br />

Metalworking 9 25 35<br />

Source: US Department of Commerce (1992) <strong>and</strong> Scott, A.J. (2003): “Cultural Capital <strong>and</strong> the Theory of <strong>Development</strong>”, ILO, p. 7<br />

There is nothing surprising about this result. As indicated in the previous chapter,<br />

these project activities thrive best in close proximity to each other, which explains<br />

such groupings. But this analysis, while it identifies an important fact, does not always<br />

explain the local dynamics: for this, there are other possible methods.<br />

The cultural value chain<br />

In his study on the city of Manchester, O’Connor resorts to the “production chain<br />

model” 117 . He starts by defining the cultural production sector to cover various activities<br />

(Table 4.4.):<br />

152 CULTURE AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - ISBN 92-64-00990-6 - © <strong>OECD</strong> 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!