OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4. THE CULTURAL FABRIC OF CITIES<br />
The spatial distribution of employment, by industry<br />
The first, <strong>and</strong> most widespread, approach is that taken by Scott in his work “The<br />
Cultural Economy of Cities” (Scott, 2000). Using employment statistics for different<br />
economic sectors, he attempts to demonstrate linkages between the degree of<br />
concentration of such employment <strong>and</strong> urban phenomena. He shows, for example,<br />
that in the United States the cultural industries are concentrated primarily in<br />
metropolitan areas (cities of over one million). These cities are home to 52% of the<br />
American working population, yet they account for 96.8% of jobs in moviemaking, 77%<br />
in architecture, <strong>and</strong> 66% in book publishing. Table 4.3. shows that the urban concentration<br />
of cultural industries is very high (with the exception of radio <strong>and</strong> television, which<br />
reflects the great number of local broadcasting stations), while other industries that<br />
we might class as creative industries are less highly concentrated: musical instrument<br />
making, decorative wooden objects, etc..<br />
Table 4.3. The urban concentration of cultural industries<br />
Activity Number of jobs Number of jobs % of sector jobs in<br />
in metropolitan in the USA (000). metropolitan<br />
areas (000) areas (%)<br />
Cinema 241 249 96.8<br />
Radio/TV 102 221 46<br />
Book publishing 53 79 66<br />
Newspapers 190 417 45<br />
Architecture 93 121 77<br />
Musical instruments 3 12 26<br />
Jewellery 29 46 63<br />
Leatherworking 4 11 42<br />
Woodworking 26 121 23<br />
Metalworking 9 25 35<br />
Source: US Department of Commerce (1992) <strong>and</strong> Scott, A.J. (2003): “Cultural Capital <strong>and</strong> the Theory of <strong>Development</strong>”, ILO, p. 7<br />
There is nothing surprising about this result. As indicated in the previous chapter,<br />
these project activities thrive best in close proximity to each other, which explains<br />
such groupings. But this analysis, while it identifies an important fact, does not always<br />
explain the local dynamics: for this, there are other possible methods.<br />
The cultural value chain<br />
In his study on the city of Manchester, O’Connor resorts to the “production chain<br />
model” 117 . He starts by defining the cultural production sector to cover various activities<br />
(Table 4.4.):<br />
152 CULTURE AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - ISBN 92-64-00990-6 - © <strong>OECD</strong> 2005