06.04.2014 Views

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANNEX 1<br />

This distinction between short-term <strong>and</strong> long-term multipliers is important, for<br />

it leads to divergent values. For the following scale of values: F = 0,5, c = 0,9, m = 0,7,<br />

t i = 0,16, t d = 0, 20 <strong>and</strong> b = 0,2, the short-term multiplier will be 1.25, while the longterm<br />

multiplier will be 0.40.<br />

These multipliers are generally estimated at the national level. There are many<br />

illustrations for the area of tourism receipts, although not for “cultural tourism”. Table<br />

1 provides a few examples. It shows that this multiplier varies inversely with the<br />

degree of territorial integration. Thus it is much higher for the United Kingdom than<br />

it is for Egypt or Mauritius, where tourism goods are typically imported.<br />

Table 1. Value of tourism multipliers at the national level<br />

United Kingdom 1.73<br />

Republic of Irel<strong>and</strong> 1.71<br />

Egypt 1.23<br />

Cyprus 1.14<br />

Mauritius 0.97<br />

Source: Cooper, CH. & al. (1998), Tourism: Principles <strong>and</strong> Practice, Longman, pp. 142-143<br />

At the local level, estimating these multipliers is a complicated affair, subject to<br />

several difficulties. The current benchmark study is still the one done some time ago<br />

by John Myerscough 122 . Analysing several local territories in the United Kingdom, he<br />

cross-referenced three sources: reports from artistic activity surveys, reports from tourism<br />

surveys, <strong>and</strong> consumption studies. He established an average value for the multiplier<br />

of around 1.4, a value that has since been used as the benchmark for most studies.<br />

But this value changed with:<br />

• The territory’s population density: the higher the density, the higher the<br />

multiplier, explained by the fact that the dem<strong>and</strong> for services can be more readily<br />

satisfied by local supply.<br />

• Territorial size: the larger the territory, the higher the multiplier, because leaks<br />

become relatively less important.<br />

Table 2. Value of tourism multipliers at the local level<br />

MUSEUM<br />

THEATRE<br />

High population density 1.42 1.40<br />

Medium population density 1.28 1.26<br />

Low population density 1.26 1.23<br />

Source: Based on Myerscough, J. (1988), The Economic Importance of Arts in Britain, London: Policies Study Institute,<br />

p. 88 ff.<br />

178 CULTURE AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - ISBN 92-64-00990-6 - © <strong>OECD</strong> 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!