OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ANNEX 1<br />
This distinction between short-term <strong>and</strong> long-term multipliers is important, for<br />
it leads to divergent values. For the following scale of values: F = 0,5, c = 0,9, m = 0,7,<br />
t i = 0,16, t d = 0, 20 <strong>and</strong> b = 0,2, the short-term multiplier will be 1.25, while the longterm<br />
multiplier will be 0.40.<br />
These multipliers are generally estimated at the national level. There are many<br />
illustrations for the area of tourism receipts, although not for “cultural tourism”. Table<br />
1 provides a few examples. It shows that this multiplier varies inversely with the<br />
degree of territorial integration. Thus it is much higher for the United Kingdom than<br />
it is for Egypt or Mauritius, where tourism goods are typically imported.<br />
Table 1. Value of tourism multipliers at the national level<br />
United Kingdom 1.73<br />
Republic of Irel<strong>and</strong> 1.71<br />
Egypt 1.23<br />
Cyprus 1.14<br />
Mauritius 0.97<br />
Source: Cooper, CH. & al. (1998), Tourism: Principles <strong>and</strong> Practice, Longman, pp. 142-143<br />
At the local level, estimating these multipliers is a complicated affair, subject to<br />
several difficulties. The current benchmark study is still the one done some time ago<br />
by John Myerscough 122 . Analysing several local territories in the United Kingdom, he<br />
cross-referenced three sources: reports from artistic activity surveys, reports from tourism<br />
surveys, <strong>and</strong> consumption studies. He established an average value for the multiplier<br />
of around 1.4, a value that has since been used as the benchmark for most studies.<br />
But this value changed with:<br />
• The territory’s population density: the higher the density, the higher the<br />
multiplier, explained by the fact that the dem<strong>and</strong> for services can be more readily<br />
satisfied by local supply.<br />
• Territorial size: the larger the territory, the higher the multiplier, because leaks<br />
become relatively less important.<br />
Table 2. Value of tourism multipliers at the local level<br />
MUSEUM<br />
THEATRE<br />
High population density 1.42 1.40<br />
Medium population density 1.28 1.26<br />
Low population density 1.26 1.23<br />
Source: Based on Myerscough, J. (1988), The Economic Importance of Arts in Britain, London: Policies Study Institute,<br />
p. 88 ff.<br />
178 CULTURE AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - ISBN 92-64-00990-6 - © <strong>OECD</strong> 2005