OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. USING A TERRITORY’S CULTURE TO PROMOTE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT<br />
recommend the intensive use of cultural practices as a kind of balm. In 1997, a Council<br />
of Europe report painted a particularly rosy picture of such efforts:<br />
In terms of direct effects, “the arts <strong>and</strong> culture provide ‘socially valuable’ leisure<br />
activities, ‘elevate’ people’s thinking <strong>and</strong> contribute positively to their psychological<br />
<strong>and</strong> social well-being <strong>and</strong> enhance their sensitivity.”<br />
In terms of indirect effects, “the arts enrich the social environment with stimulating<br />
or pleasing public amenities. They are a source of ‘civilising’ impacts <strong>and</strong> of social<br />
organisation. Artistic activity, by stimulating creativity, …enhances innovation. Works<br />
of art <strong>and</strong> cultural products are a collective ‘memory’ for a community <strong>and</strong> serve<br />
as a reservoir of creative <strong>and</strong> intellectual ideas for future generations. Arts <strong>and</strong><br />
cultural institutions improve the quality of life <strong>and</strong> so in urban areas enhance<br />
personal security <strong>and</strong> reduce the incidence of street crime <strong>and</strong> hooliganism.” 29 .<br />
This view is shared by the British think tank Comedia, which published several<br />
case studies on the social impact of culture, especially in urban settings, where it was<br />
found to bring a number of benefits, such as enhancing social cohesion, improving<br />
local image, reducing offending behaviour, developing self-confidence, <strong>and</strong> building<br />
public <strong>and</strong> private sector partnerships (Reeves, 2002).<br />
Taken literally, this euphoric view of culture <strong>and</strong> social problems is ambiguous.<br />
There is nothing to guarantee that exposure to the same values will lead to their<br />
acceptance. Things are not that automatic. Individuals react more instinctively <strong>and</strong><br />
with less discipline than we might think. They rely on a host of environmental signals,<br />
they are more sensitive to certain symbols or signs than to others, <strong>and</strong> they often seek<br />
to differentiate themselves from others (Molotch, 2003) 30 .<br />
This systematic belief in the positive social effects of culture seems to assume<br />
that there is a kind of implicit agreement on shared values, as if cultural counter currents<br />
did not exist in societies, communities <strong>and</strong> territories 31 . Moreover, it is difficult to imagine<br />
how cultural integration could exist in the absence of economic integration, as these<br />
interpretations imply.<br />
Experience with local development, particularly with problem neighbourhoods,<br />
shows that successful integration depends as much on the workings of the labour market<br />
as on cultural activities. Social integration without cultural integration is a feature of<br />
situations where there is no unemployment but where at the same time inequalities<br />
persist, particularly in cultural terms. On the contrary, there may be cases where lack<br />
of social integration <strong>and</strong> strong cultural integration go h<strong>and</strong>-in-h<strong>and</strong>, for example<br />
when unemployment <strong>and</strong> low living st<strong>and</strong>ards co-exist with the homogenisation of<br />
cultural practices <strong>and</strong> aspirations. Cultural infrastructure in a sense works counter to<br />
the market, <strong>and</strong> this creates severe difficulties: aspirations for equality, which are stronger<br />
38 CULTURE AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - ISBN 92-64-00990-6 - © <strong>OECD</strong> 2005