06.04.2014 Views

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NOTES<br />

58. Economic spin-offs are estimated at 625 francs per spectator in 1995. Taking the known average visitor<br />

stay of 2.5 days, <strong>and</strong> the 85,000 tickets sold, we assume a visitor will attend two shows a day, which<br />

yields a total of 17,000 (85,000/5) spectators, <strong>and</strong> total spending of some 10.6 million francs (including<br />

ticket sales).<br />

59. The Berlin Festival, the Berlinade, is another of the most important international film festivals, drawing<br />

400,000 spectators. Monetary spin-offs for the city are estimated at some €30 million, including €9<br />

million in tax revenues. The spin-offs from this Festival are spread more widely than those from<br />

Cannes, in the sense that Berlin is a huge city <strong>and</strong> is much more of a mass tourism centre than Cannes.<br />

60. For example, in 1997 the Basel Fair was emptied after its first day as visitors flocked to the Venice<br />

Biennial, which opened the next day.<br />

61. 20% of visitors to Documenta are foreign, <strong>and</strong> they generate 98,000 bed-nights.<br />

62. Origet du Cluzeau, Cl. (1998), Le tourisme culturel, Paris: PUF, pp.4-6.<br />

63. Viel A. & A. Nivart (2004), “Qu<strong>and</strong> les parcs se font culture”, Conférence à l’École Nationale du<br />

Patrimoine, Paris: 3 Mars, p.7<br />

64. A good example is the debate over “pollution rights”.<br />

65 . Colbert (F) – Boisvert (JM) : Etude de certaines dimensions économiques des activités à caractère culturel : le cas de<br />

l’orchestre symphonique de Montréal, du musée des beaux-arts de Montréal et du festival international de jazz de Montréal,<br />

City of Montréal (CIDEM-Tourism) <strong>and</strong> Quebec Ministry of Cultural Affairs, May, 1985.<br />

66. Another concept could come into play here as a constraint: that of non-cultural dem<strong>and</strong> for cultural<br />

services. Non-heritage businesses may insist that cultural services be offered, because they benefit<br />

from the spin-offs. They do not consume these services, but they derive benefits from others’<br />

consumption. The entire tourism industry relies on this principle. This dem<strong>and</strong> by businesses has a<br />

very original aspect. The prices they are willing to pay will have to rise as cultural consumption rises,<br />

producing thereby a positive “quantity-price” relationship that translates into a causality that is the<br />

reverse of traditional dem<strong>and</strong> behaviour. A second characteristic is that this dem<strong>and</strong> will only appear<br />

beyond a certain threshold of cultural consumption, i.e. at the point where a change in the number of<br />

consumers unleashes a positive change in their activity. The problem, of course, is that these businesses<br />

will not necessarily make the required investments, <strong>and</strong> will merely act as stakeholders or pressure<br />

groups. As taxpayers, these firms will expect the government or the municipality to find ways to meet<br />

cultural needs. <strong>Local</strong> or national policymakers indeed have a tendency to meet such needs, even if<br />

they will recuperate a portion of the investment through taxes. In some cases, these firms will state<br />

their dem<strong>and</strong>s to the private owners of cultural goods, <strong>and</strong> may even enter into a partnership with these<br />

owners, by pooling services for example. But the most frequent response is to organize pressure<br />

groups to lobby government. Seeing themselves as taxpayers, cultural businesses consider they have<br />

already paied their dues for such facilities. Moreover, some members of the group may behave as “free<br />

riders”: they will not reveal any particular preference, since this might increase their expected<br />

contribution, but they will hope that others will reveal their preferences <strong>and</strong> be willing to pay for them.<br />

67. Greffe (2000), La gestion du patrimoine culturel, op. cit., pp. 104 <strong>and</strong> ff.<br />

68. Supporters of this reasoning will invoke heritage sites <strong>and</strong> museums for two reasons: they are generally<br />

permanent in nature, which avoids the problem of temporary consumption; there may be some doubt<br />

about the consumption motive, whereas this will be less true in other situations such as attendance<br />

at a concert.<br />

CULTURE AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - ISBN 92-64-00990-6 - © <strong>OECD</strong> 2005 193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!