OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. LOCAL DEVELOPMENT BASED ON ATTRACTING VISITORS AND TOURISTS<br />
to address in order to provide a feeling of security for tourists <strong>and</strong> for investors, who<br />
have been few to date.<br />
The Museum District of Paris<br />
The spin-offs from these museums are important, then, <strong>and</strong> they are even more<br />
so in the big cities, such as Paris.<br />
In 1998, nearly 12 million tourists came to Paris, for various reasons: cultural,<br />
business, recreation, etc. “Museum tourists” were defined within this group as those<br />
visiting at least three museums or similar institutions. Given the difficulty of identifying<br />
these visits, when admission is sometimes free, two hypotheses were constructed: a<br />
low hypothesis, according to which 2.98 million tourists had visited the Louvre,<br />
Versailles, <strong>and</strong> La Villette or Orsay; <strong>and</strong> a high hypothesis, according to which 4.2 million<br />
tourists had visited the Eiffel Tower, the Louvre <strong>and</strong> Versailles (Greffe, 1999).<br />
These tourists behave differently depending on whether they are French or<br />
foreign. They do not spend the same number of nights in Paris 48 . Their daily spending<br />
patterns are not the same: a French tourist is assumed to spend on average 121 euros<br />
a day for accommodation, transportation <strong>and</strong> entrance fees, while a foreign tourist<br />
would spend around 151 euros, with substantial differences from one person to the<br />
next 49 . From this we derive overall spending of €1.17 billion under the low hypothesis,<br />
<strong>and</strong> €1.62 billion under the high hypothesis. We must then apply a multiplier<br />
coefficient to take account of the effect of this spending on the incomes of hotel, museum<br />
<strong>and</strong> transportation workers, since those incomes will be spent <strong>and</strong> passed on through<br />
other economic sectors successively. For this purpose, we selected Myerscough’s<br />
multiplier coefficient for London (1.4), as one of the most plausible. Total spending,<br />
then, is €1.64 billion under the low hypothesis <strong>and</strong> €2.26 billion for the high<br />
hypothesis. It remains to add in spending on souvenirs or luxury goods that, because<br />
they are not generally produced in Paris, will not have a multiplier effect on the<br />
immediate territory, but may contribute to creating jobs elsewhere in the country. Based<br />
on the same surveys, we assume average souvenir spending of €45.45 for a French<br />
tourist, <strong>and</strong> €75.75 for a foreign tourist.<br />
This gives total spending of €1.84 billion under the low hypothesis <strong>and</strong> €2.64<br />
billion under the high hypothesis. If the cost of creating one job in the services sector<br />
is around €40,000, this amount represents a total of 43,000 jobs created or maintained.<br />
If we take a lower figure (€30,000 ) as the cost for creating a service job, the figure for<br />
employment created or maintained is 86,000. The first figure seems considerably more<br />
plausible, since we must first deduct from this total spending the amount of spending<br />
on materials. The bottom line from this type of analysis, which relies on many<br />
hypotheses, each of which reduces the reliability of the final outcome, is that the amount<br />
of this spending <strong>and</strong> the number of jobs created are very significant 50 .<br />
70 CULTURE AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - ISBN 92-64-00990-6 - © <strong>OECD</strong> 2005