06.04.2014 Views

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

OECD Culture and Local Development.pdf - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. LOCAL DEVELOPMENT BASED ON ATTRACTING VISITORS AND TOURISTS<br />

• If the visitor is a local resident, was he inspired by the monument to increase<br />

his spending, or has he simply diverted spending from another local use, in<br />

which case what is involved is not a multiplier but a transfer?<br />

These three questions can cast in the following sequence:<br />

• “Would you spend time in this territory if the monument were not there?” If<br />

the visitor says no, we must conclude that all of his spending can be attributed<br />

to the museum’s existence. If he responds yes, this means that he has come<br />

for several reasons, <strong>and</strong> the problem will be to determine which portion of his<br />

local spending can be attributed to the museum alone.<br />

• Then comes the second question: “Would you reduce your spending if the<br />

monument were not there?” If the visitor says no, this means that the monument<br />

has played no role in the volume of his spending, <strong>and</strong> cannot be used to<br />

explain any portion of it. If the visitor says yes, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, the monument<br />

has indeed served as an attraction, <strong>and</strong> should be credited with a portion x of<br />

the visitor’s spending in the territory.<br />

• Finally, if we are dealing with a local resident (a day trip), another question must<br />

be posed, as an alternative to the first: “would you have visited something else,<br />

or made some other expenditure, if the monument were not there?” If the<br />

response is negative, this means that all of his spending can be attributed to<br />

the monument. If the answer is negative, this means that the expenditure has<br />

displaced spending on other uses. We must then ab<strong>and</strong>on the multiplier, or at<br />

least prorate its application among competing uses.<br />

The degree of a territory’s integration <strong>and</strong> the effects of diversion<br />

A portion of the expected development impact may appear in other territories<br />

than the one where the cultural resource is located. This will happen if the<br />

anticipated visitor spending goes not to products of the territory, but to those of<br />

other territories from which they are imported. The development effect will then<br />

depend no longer on the nature or importance of the monument itself, but on the<br />

territory’s degree of economic integration. A well-integrated local economy can<br />

produce high multipliers, while one that is less well-integrated, <strong>and</strong> where visitor<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>s must be satisfied through external activities <strong>and</strong> employment, will show<br />

weak development effects.<br />

Let us consider the renovation of a monument where several types of services<br />

will now be offered. The jobs created at the monument <strong>and</strong> in the visitor <strong>and</strong> tourist<br />

facilities are set at 100. The expected employment multiplier is 1.4, which means that<br />

for every job created initially the territory will derive 1.4 jobs. We can identify three<br />

CULTURE AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - ISBN 92-64-00990-6 - © <strong>OECD</strong> 2005 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!