23.11.2014 Views

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fuel cycle<br />

Practice<br />

Uranium milling and<br />

mining<br />

Yellow cake<br />

processing<br />

UF 6 conversion<br />

plants<br />

Enrichment plants<br />

Fuel fabrication<br />

using uranium<br />

Fuel fabrication<br />

using plutonium<br />

Threat summary<br />

On site: If uncontrolled, potential for severe tissue damage or fatal<br />

exposure. The threat is dependant on the inventory of the source<br />

(See appendices 8 and 18)<br />

Off site: No potential for releases in excess of urgent GILs.<br />

Contamination warranting intervention (e.g. water contamination)<br />

could result from tailing pond failures.<br />

On site: No potential for exceeding urgent GILs.<br />

Same as uranium milling and mining.<br />

Off site: Potential for deaths from a UF 6 release due to chemical<br />

toxicity from HF (product of UF 6 release). The potential is a<br />

function of UF 6 inventory. Greatest risk appears to be ruptures of<br />

heated tanks of many tons.<br />

On site: Same as off site.<br />

Off site: Same as UF 6 conversion plants.<br />

On site: Same as UF 6 conversion plants.<br />

Off site: Risk for UF 6 same as for UF 6 conversion plants. Potential<br />

for doses in excess of urgent GILs from criticality accidents 21 if<br />

the fissile material is processed in an unshielded location within<br />

200-500 m of the site boundary.<br />

On site: Risk for UF 6 same as for UF 6 conversion plants. Potential<br />

for deterministic health effects and doses in excess of urgent GILs<br />

on-site from criticality accidents.<br />

Off site: Potential for doses in excess of urgent GILs from<br />

criticality accidents 21 if the fissile material is processed in an<br />

unshielded location within 200-500 m of the site boundary. Large<br />

fires or explosions could result in doses off site in excess of<br />

urgent GILs near the facility. This will be a function of inventory.<br />

On site: Potential for deterministic health effects and doses in<br />

excess of urgent GILs from criticality accidents. Fires and<br />

explosions could result in doses in excess of urgent GILs from<br />

inhalation.<br />

Typical threat<br />

category<br />

None 54<br />

None 54<br />

54, 57,<br />

None<br />

None 54,57<br />

II or III 55<br />

II or III 55<br />

New fuel (notirradiated)<br />

Off site: No potential for doses in excess of urgent GILs. None 54<br />

57 Chemical toxicity due to a UF 6 release is far more important than radiation dose even for highly enriched uranium. Lethal<br />

(due to chemical toxicity) concentration of HF may be possible off site (See Ref. [19]).<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!