23.11.2014 Views

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

involving this amount of radioactive material. However, a limited area, probably no more<br />

than a small fraction of a square kilometre (i.e. a few soccer pitches), may be contaminated<br />

to non-dangerous levels that may warrant long term control 147 or clean up 146 . The size of the<br />

area to be cleaned up would depend on many factors (including the size and type of source,<br />

whether and how it had been dispersed, and the weather). It would be virtually impossible<br />

for this amount of radioactive material to contaminate a public water supply to dangerous<br />

levels, even if the radioactive material were highly soluble in water.<br />

A/D >10.0 -1000<br />

A/D >1000<br />

INDIVIDUAL SOURCES<br />

Very dangerous to the person: This amount of radioactive material, if not managed safely<br />

and kept securely, could cause the permanent injury of a person who handles it or is<br />

otherwise in contact with it for a short time (minutes to hours). It could possibly be fatal to<br />

be close to unshielded material for a period of hours to days.<br />

DISPERSIBLE RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL<br />

Very dangerous in the locality: Handling this amount of radioactive material could be<br />

fatal. There would be little or no risk of permanent injuries beyond a hundred metres<br />

downwind of a fire or explosion involving this amount of radioactive material. However, a<br />

limited area, probably no more than one square kilometre, could be contaminated to nondangerous<br />

levels that may warrant long term controls or clean up 146 . The size of the area to<br />

be cleaned up would depend on many factors (including the size and type of the source,<br />

whether and how it had been dispersed, and the weather).<br />

It would be virtually impossible for this amount of radioactive material to contaminate a<br />

public water supply to dangerous levels, even if the radioactive material were highly soluble<br />

in water.<br />

INDIVIDUAL SOURCES<br />

Extremely dangerous to the person: This amount of radioactive material, if not managed<br />

safely and kept securely, could cause the permanent injury of a person who handles it or is<br />

otherwise in contact with it. It would probably be fatal to be close to unshielded material for<br />

a period of minutes to an hour.<br />

DISPERSIBLE RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL<br />

Very dangerous in the locality: Handling this amount of radioactive material would likely<br />

be fatal. There would be little or no risk of permanent injuries beyond a few hundred metres<br />

downwind of a fire or explosion involving this amount of radioactive material. However, a<br />

limited area, probably no more than a few square kilometres, could be contaminated to nondangerous<br />

levels that may warrant long term controls or clean up. The size of the area to be<br />

147 This only applies to radionuclides that have long half-lives and refers to levels of contamination that could result in doses<br />

in excess of those warranting permanent resettlement in accordance with international guidance (1000 mSv over a lifetime)<br />

[2, 3].<br />

248

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!