23.11.2014 Views

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. PLANNING BASIS<br />

2.1 Types of threats<br />

Give a brief description of the radiation threats that were considered in developing the plan.<br />

This should be a summary of the results of the threat assessment discussed in Section 2.2.5<br />

and should include findings on uncontrolled source emergencies (see Element B4.2) and<br />

other appropriate threats discussed in Section 4.1. In appendices or other referenced<br />

documents list and show on a map any threat category I, II and III facilities and local<br />

jurisdictions which fall within emergency zones (see Task 2, Section 2.2.5) or food restriction<br />

planning radius.<br />

2.2 Terms<br />

Refer to an appendix for standard definitions of terms that should be used consistently in<br />

other plans and procedures in order to promote co-ordination. Where possible, the terms<br />

used by the organizations involved in the response to conventional emergencies should be<br />

adopted.<br />

2.3 Response roles and responsibilities (see Element B1.2)<br />

Describe the roles and responsibilities of national and local response organizations (see<br />

Section 2.2.4). This could be accomplished by a table showing the organizations: 1)<br />

responsible for authorizing/activating the national response, 2) directing the total national<br />

response, and 3) responsible for the different functional areas listed in Sections 3 and 4. This<br />

table should show how responsibilities could differ (see Element B1.1) under different<br />

conditions such as: the source of the radiation hazards (e.g. licensed practice/material,<br />

natural material, international, military, unknown); or simultaneous involvement of other<br />

emergency plans or hazards (e.g. major natural disaster or criminal activity: see Element<br />

B4.4). This could be based on the result of the allocation of responsibilities described in<br />

Section 2.2.7. Describe how responsibilities are delegated or transferred (see Element B1.4)<br />

and the responsibilities of local response organizations and the operators and conditions<br />

when these may change (see Elements B1.2, B4.2).<br />

2.4 Response organization<br />

Provide a block diagram of the national level response organization components (sections,<br />

groups and teams) with a brief description of responsibilities of each “block” and where the<br />

organizational element will probably perform (see Appendix 14 and Element B1.3). The<br />

emergency response organization structure discussed in Appendix 13 should be used for the<br />

national and local response organizations to foster integration. It should show how the<br />

national level response interfaces with the response of other organizations (see Element<br />

B2.1).<br />

2.5 Response facilities (see Element B5.1)<br />

Describe the response facilities that may be functional during a response. This should<br />

include, as appropriate, those described in Appendix 14 (see Elements B5.4, B5.5).<br />

192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!