epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...
epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...
epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2. PLANNING BASIS<br />
2.1 Types of threats<br />
Give a brief description of the radiation threats that were considered in developing the plan.<br />
This should be a summary of the results of the threat assessment discussed in Section 2.2.5<br />
and should include findings on uncontrolled source emergencies (see Element B4.2) and<br />
other appropriate threats discussed in Section 4.1. In appendices or other referenced<br />
documents list and show on a map any threat category I, II and III facilities and local<br />
jurisdictions which fall within emergency zones (see Task 2, Section 2.2.5) or food restriction<br />
planning radius.<br />
2.2 Terms<br />
Refer to an appendix for standard definitions of terms that should be used consistently in<br />
other plans and procedures in order to promote co-ordination. Where possible, the terms<br />
used by the organizations involved in the response to conventional emergencies should be<br />
adopted.<br />
2.3 Response roles and responsibilities (see Element B1.2)<br />
Describe the roles and responsibilities of national and local response organizations (see<br />
Section 2.2.4). This could be accomplished by a table showing the organizations: 1)<br />
responsible for authorizing/activating the national response, 2) directing the total national<br />
response, and 3) responsible for the different functional areas listed in Sections 3 and 4. This<br />
table should show how responsibilities could differ (see Element B1.1) under different<br />
conditions such as: the source of the radiation hazards (e.g. licensed practice/material,<br />
natural material, international, military, unknown); or simultaneous involvement of other<br />
emergency plans or hazards (e.g. major natural disaster or criminal activity: see Element<br />
B4.4). This could be based on the result of the allocation of responsibilities described in<br />
Section 2.2.7. Describe how responsibilities are delegated or transferred (see Element B1.4)<br />
and the responsibilities of local response organizations and the operators and conditions<br />
when these may change (see Elements B1.2, B4.2).<br />
2.4 Response organization<br />
Provide a block diagram of the national level response organization components (sections,<br />
groups and teams) with a brief description of responsibilities of each “block” and where the<br />
organizational element will probably perform (see Appendix 14 and Element B1.3). The<br />
emergency response organization structure discussed in Appendix 13 should be used for the<br />
national and local response organizations to foster integration. It should show how the<br />
national level response interfaces with the response of other organizations (see Element<br />
B2.1).<br />
2.5 Response facilities (see Element B5.1)<br />
Describe the response facilities that may be functional during a response. This should<br />
include, as appropriate, those described in Appendix 14 (see Elements B5.4, B5.5).<br />
192