epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...
epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...
epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Practice<br />
Type C packages<br />
UN 3323<br />
Special<br />
arrangements<br />
UN 2919<br />
Package containing<br />
fissile material<br />
UN 2977<br />
UN 3324<br />
UN 3325<br />
UN 3326<br />
UN 3327<br />
UN 3328<br />
UN 3329<br />
UN 3330<br />
UN 3331<br />
Packages containing<br />
UF 6<br />
UN 2978<br />
Other<br />
Nuclear weapon<br />
accident (Pu<br />
dispersal)<br />
Threat summary<br />
Type C packages will normally contain large amounts of<br />
radioactive material. Therefore, Type C packages have been<br />
designed to withstand all credible land, sea and air transport<br />
accidents. Doses in excess of the urgent GILs are not considered<br />
credible. However, in the event of an emergency, this should be<br />
confirmed by monitoring.<br />
Shipments of non-fissile or fissile excepted radioactive material<br />
transported under special arrangement require seven days prior<br />
notification to the competent authorities of each State involved. In<br />
an accident, urgent GILs may be exceeded. Ground contamination<br />
resulting from the accident may require decontamination.<br />
Industrial, Type A, Type B and Type C packages may all contain<br />
fissile materials. Such packages containing fissile material are<br />
designed with the contents limited, so as to maintain subcriticality<br />
during both normal and accident conditions of transport. The risk<br />
summary is therefore the same as that for the relevant Industrial,<br />
Type A, Type B or Type C package. Type IF, Type AF, Type<br />
B(U)F or Type B(M)F packages that are involved in an air<br />
accident and contain only fissile UF 6 , may release UF 6 with the<br />
associated chemical hazard. However packages containing only<br />
UF 6 have no risk of any radiological consequences requiring<br />
special protective actions. Ground contamination resulting from<br />
the emergency may require decontamination.<br />
Packages containing non-fissile or fissile excepted quantities of<br />
UF 6 that are involved in an air accident may release UF 6 with the<br />
associated chemical hazard. There is no risk of any radiological<br />
consequences requiring special protective actions. Ground<br />
contamination resulting from the emergency may require<br />
decontamination.<br />
If there is a fire or explosion resulting in dispersal of Pu from a<br />
weapon, deterministic health effects are possible from inhalation<br />
of the plume or resuspension of deposited material within about 1<br />
km. The area of significant contamination could be on the order<br />
of a square kilometre. It may not be possible to detect dangerous<br />
levels of airborne contamination with common radiation survey<br />
instruments.<br />
Typical threat<br />
category<br />
None or IV 59<br />
None or IV 59<br />
None or IV 59<br />
None 57<br />
IV<br />
59 These are not considered dangerous sources provided they are properly controlled and not removed from the packaging<br />
except in supervised conditions. However, if they are lost, stolen or inadvertently removed from their packaging, the<br />
information in Appendix 7 for a “Lost dangerous source” or ‘Theft of a dangerous source” should be followed.<br />
124