23.11.2014 Views

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2.10. Taking agricultural and longer term protective action (A10 elements)<br />

Response objectives:<br />

(1) To take agricultural countermeasures and longer-term protective actions in compliance with international standards (4.85).<br />

(2) To manage radioactive waste and contamination appropriately (4.86).<br />

(3) To discontinue protective actions when assessments show that they are no longer justified (4.87).<br />

A10 - TAKING AGRICULTURAL COUNTERMEASURES, COUNTERMEASURES AGAINST<br />

INGESTION AND LONGER TERM PROTECTIVE ACTION<br />

Threat category<br />

Responsibility<br />

Elements I II III IV V O L N<br />

81<br />

A10.1 Establish national intervention levels and action levels for agricultural countermeasures,<br />

countermeasures against ingestion and long term protective actions that are in compliance with<br />

international standards, modified to take account of local and national conditions, such as:<br />

(1) the individual and collective dose to be averted by the intervention; and<br />

(2) the radiological and non-radiological health risks and the financial and social costs and benefits<br />

associated with the intervention (4.88).<br />

Scientifically based recommendations for implementing countermeasures should be accompanied by an<br />

explanation that enables the public and decision makers to understand them, reasonably consider them<br />

and explain them to the other stakeholders. The explanation must make it clear to people that it ensures<br />

their “safety” and that of all other family members, including unborn children. Therefore, along with the<br />

criteria there should be a common language statement defining “safe”. This explanation should be tested<br />

on r<strong>epr</strong>esentative members of the intended audience. This should include arrangements to respond, as<br />

outlined in Appendix 7, to radiological emergencies involving accidental or intentional contamination of<br />

the food, water or products.<br />

The international guidance (GILs and GALs) r<strong>epr</strong>oduced in Appendix 1 for relocation, resettlement and<br />

foodstuff restrictions is for a large release involving rural areas where alternative food supplies are<br />

available. Make provisions to adjust the criteria if alternative food is not available and to adopt higher<br />

relocation GILs for contamination of large metropolitan areas or other conditions where relocation may<br />

have a significant social or psychological impact.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!