23.11.2014 Views

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2.4. Taking urgent protective action (A4 elements)<br />

Response objectives:<br />

(1) To take all appropriate measures to save lives (4.41).<br />

(2) To take urgent protective actions, in compliance with international standards, to avoid severe deterministic health effects and avert doses<br />

(4.42).<br />

(3) To modify urgent protective actions, as appropriate, in the light of any new information relating to the emergency that becomes available<br />

(4.43).<br />

(4) To discontinue a protective action when it is no longer justified (4.44).<br />

A4 – TAKING URGENT PROTECTIVE ACTION Threat category Responsibility<br />

Elements I II III IV V O L N<br />

A4.1 Establish optimized national intervention levels to take urgent protective actions in compliance with<br />

international standards, taking into account local and national conditions, such as:<br />

1) the individual and collective doses to be averted by the intervention; and<br />

2) the radiological and non-radiological health risks and the financial and social costs and benefits<br />

associated with the intervention (4.45).<br />

Scientifically based recommendations for implementing countermeasures should be accompanied by an<br />

explanation that enables the public and decision makers to understand them, reasonably consider them<br />

and explain them to the other stakeholders. The explanation must make it clear to people that it ensures<br />

their “safety” and that of all other family members, including unborn children. Therefore, along with the<br />

criteria there should be a common language statement defining “safe”. This explanation should be tested<br />

on r<strong>epr</strong>esentative members of the intended audience.<br />

The intervention levels should be consistent with the international standards contained in Refs. [2,3]<br />

r<strong>epr</strong>oduced here in Appendix 1. The existing generic intervention levels (GILs) for evacuation in the<br />

international standards [2,3] are for good travel conditions; however, evacuation or substantial shelter<br />

should always be implemented if the acute dose to an organ approaches or exceeds the dose levels in<br />

Appendix 2. The use of the inhalation committed effective dose factors from Refs. [2,3], which are for a<br />

lifetime (50–70 years), is inappropriate in calculating the acute dose.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!